Process DocumentationCAUTION
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Overview
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
8d32d25aa3f5OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: process-documentation description: "Document any business process in a clear, structured format. Use when asked to document a process, write a process guide, create a workflow document, or map out how something works. Produces a complete process document with steps, roles, inputs, outputs, and edge cases." --- # Process Documentation Skill Produces clear, structured process documentation that someone new to a role can follow without needing to ask questions. ## Required Inputs - **Process name** - **Process description** (rough notes are fine) - **Who does this process** (roles involved) - **How often it runs** (daily / weekly / monthly / event-triggered) - **Tools involved** - **Known edge cases** ## Output Structure --- # Process: [Process Name] **Owner:** [Role] | **Frequency:** [How often] | **Estimated time:** [Duration] --- ### Purpose [1-2 sentences. Why does this process exist? What breaks if it is not done?] ### Scope **In scope:** [What this covers] **Out of scope:** [What it does not cover] ### Prerequisites - [ ] [Required access or information] - [ ] [Any dependency that must be completed first] --- ### Roles and Responsibilities | Role | Responsibility | |---|---| | [Role 1] | [What they do] | --- ### Process Steps **Step 1: [Step name]** - **Who:** [Role] - **When:** [Trigger or timing] - **How:** [Substeps numbered] - **Output:** [What exists at end of this step] - **Tool:** [System used] [Continue for all steps] --- ### Edge Cases and Exceptions | Situation | What to do | Who to contact | |---|---|---| | [Edge case] | [Action] | [Name/role] | --- ### Common Mistakes [2-4 things people get wrong the first time] ### Escalation Path [Name/role] → [Next level] → [Final escalation] ### Review Next review due: [Date] ## Quality Checks - [ ] Every step has a named role (not "someone" or "the team") - [ ] Edge cases and exceptions table is complete - [ ] Prerequisites are listed so someone new can prepare before starting - [ ] Escalation path is named (specific people or roles, not just "your manager") - [ ] Review date is set ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not write steps without specifying who is responsible for each — ownership must be explicit throughout - [ ] Do not omit the escalation path — every process must say what happens when something goes wrong - [ ] Do not document the ideal process if the real process differs — document reality, then note improvements separately - [ ] Do not skip edge cases and exceptions — they are where most process failures actually occur - [ ] Do not produce documentation without a review date — undated process docs quickly become incorrect ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Document this process: [description]" - "Write a process guide for [workflow]" - "Map out how [process] works"
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/discovery-interview-guide/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/job-story-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/user-interview-synthesis/SKILL.md
templates/pm-launch-agent/skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
8d32d25aa3f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mohitagw15856__process-documentation.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 8d32d25aa3f5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Process Documentation skill do?
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Is Process Documentation safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Process Documentation access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (8d32d25aa3f5), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.