Pptx Slide AuditorCAUTION
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Overview
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
8d32d25aa3f5OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: pptx-slide-auditor description: "Audit a PowerPoint presentation for layout issues, text overflow, visual hierarchy problems, and consistency gaps. Use when asked to review a slide deck, check a presentation before a meeting, audit slides for layout problems, or QA a deck before sharing. Produces a slide-by-slide report with issues ranked by severity and specific fixes. Best used with Claude Opus 4.7 or newer for reliable slide-level vision analysis." --- # PPTX Slide Auditor Skill Runs a systematic visual and structural audit of a PowerPoint presentation — identifying layout issues, text overflow, inconsistent styling, weak visual hierarchy, and slides that will cause problems in a presentation setting. Built to leverage Opus 4.7 vision improvements for pixel-level layout analysis. ## Required Inputs Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked *(assumed, confirm)* and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about). - **The deck** (upload the .pptx file or individual slide screenshots) - **Audience** (internal team / executive / external client / conference / investor) - **Presentation mode** (presented live / sent to read / shared async on video) - **Areas of concern** (optional — e.g. "I think slide 12 is overcrowded") ## Output Structure ### 1. Deck Overview | Metric | Result | |---|---| | Total slides | N | | Overall status | Ready / Minor fixes needed / Major revisions required | | Readability score | /10 | | Visual consistency score | /10 | | Most common issue | [Pattern observed across multiple slides] | ### 2. Slide-by-Slide Audit For each slide with issues: **Slide N: [Slide title]** - Status: Ready / Fix before sending / Major revision - Issues found: - [Specific issue with exact location — e.g. "Body text extends beyond the text frame on the right side"] - [Issue 2] - Suggested fix: [Specific action — move element, reduce text, resize] Slides with no issues: just list the slide numbers. Do not write anything else about them. ### 3. Pattern Issues Across the Deck Issues that repeat across multiple slides: **[Pattern title — e.g. "Inconsistent body text size"]** - Slides affected: [list] - Root cause: [master slide issue / manual overrides / mixed templates] - Fix: [Single action to resolve across all affected slides] ### 4. Visual Hierarchy Check | Dimension | Status | Notes | |---|---|---| | Title consistency (size, font, colour) | Pass / Fail | | | Body text readability at presentation distance | Pass / Fail | | | Image placement alignment | Pass / Fail | | | Whitespace and breathing room | Pass / Fail | | | Data visualisation clarity | Pass / Fail / N/A | | ### 5. Audience-Specific Flags Based on the stated audience: - **Executive audience:** flag slides with too much text, complex tables, or unclear bottom-line messages - **External client:** flag slides with internal jargon, unfinished placeholder text, or confidentiality concerns - **Live presentation:** flag slides that will be hard to read from the back of a room - **Async/video:** flag slides that assume a presenter voiceover ### 6. Prioritised Fix List | # | Fix | Slide | Effort | Impact | |---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | [Specific fix] | Slide N | Low/Med/High | High | Order by: fixes before handoff (critical) > consistency fixes (high) > polish (medium). ## Quality Checks - [ ] Every issue references a specific slide number and location on the slide - [ ] Pattern issues are identified separately from slide-specific issues - [ ] Fix list is ordered by impact, not by slide order - [ ] Audience-appropriate concerns flagged explicitly - [ ] Slides without issues are listed briefly, not ignored ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not flag stylistic preferences as issues — only report genuine layout problems, overflow, and consistency errors - [ ] Do not produce a flat list of issues — group by severity (Critical / Major / Minor) so fixes can be prioritised - [ ] Do not skip slides without commenting — every slide must have an explicit pass or issue status - [ ] Do not suggest redesigning content — the audit scope is layout, consistency, and readability, not messaging - [ ] Do not report the same issue type repeatedly across slides without summarising the pattern — consolidate repeated issues ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Audit this slide deck before my board meeting" - "Review this PowerPoint for layout issues" - "Check this presentation for consistency problems" - "QA my deck before I send it to the client" - "What is wrong with slide 7 in this deck?" ## Why This Works Better on Opus 4.7 Earlier models struggled with precise spatial analysis of slide layouts — they would hallucinate issues or miss obvious overflow problems. Opus 4.7 vision improvements mean coordinates map 1:1 to pixels, making slide-level issue detection reliable without manual screenshot annotation.
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/discovery-interview-guide/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/job-story-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/user-interview-synthesis/SKILL.md
templates/pm-launch-agent/skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
8d32d25aa3f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mohitagw15856__pptx-slide-auditor.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 8d32d25aa3f5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Pptx Slide Auditor skill do?
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Is Pptx Slide Auditor safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Pptx Slide Auditor access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (8d32d25aa3f5), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.