Pm Weekly ReviewCAUTION
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Overview
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
8d32d25aa3f5OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: pm-weekly-review description: "Structure a PM's weekly review and planning session. Use when doing a weekly PM review, writing a weekly update, preparing for Monday planning, or reviewing sprint health. Produces a shareable weekly update covering metrics movement, shipping progress, blockers, insights, and next week's top 3 priorities." --- # PM Weekly Review Skill Turn the chaotic end-of-week brain dump into a structured 20-minute ritual that keeps you, your team, and your stakeholders aligned — without a meeting. > **Not quite this?** Use `weekly-review-ritual` when you want a personal GTD-style weekly review rather than a product review. ## The Weekly Review Structure (20 minutes) **5 min — Metrics check:** What moved? What didn't? What's surprising? **5 min — Ship progress:** What shipped? What slipped? What's blocked? **5 min — Insights:** Any customer feedback, support tickets, or research findings? **5 min — Next week priorities:** What are the 3 things that matter most? --- ## Output Format ### PM Weekly Review — Week of [Date] **Product Area:** [What you own] **Written by:** [PM Name] **Time to read:** ~3 minutes --- ### 📊 Metrics This Week | Metric | This Week | Last Week | Target | Trend | |---|---|---|---|---| | [Primary metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [Target] | ↑ / ↓ / → | | [Secondary metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [Target] | ↑ / ↓ / → | | [Health metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [Target] | ↑ / ↓ / → | **Notable movement:** - [What changed and why — 1 sentence each] **Concern to watch:** - [Anything trending in the wrong direction] --- ### 🚢 This Week's Progress **Shipped:** - ✅ [What went live] — [1-line impact or observation] **In Progress:** - 🔄 [Feature/initiative] — [% complete or current status] **Slipped / Blocked:** - ⚠️ [What didn't happen] — Reason: [brief] — Action: [who's unblocking it] **Carry-forward to next week:** - [Item + why it's carrying over] --- ### 💡 Insights & Signals **Customer feedback:** - "[Quote or paraphrase]" — Source: [user/channel] — Theme: [tag] **Support signals:** - [Top ticket category this week + volume] - [Anything that signals a product gap] **Research / data:** - [Any discovery from user interviews, analytics, or experiments] --- ### 🎯 Next Week — Top 3 Priorities | # | Priority | Why This Week | Owner | Done = | |---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | [Most important thing] | [Reason it can't wait] | [Name] | [Clear definition of done] | | 2 | [Second priority] | [Why] | [Name] | [Done criteria] | | 3 | [Third priority] | [Why] | [Name] | [Done criteria] | **Decisions needed:** - [Any decision that's blocking progress — who needs to make it] **Asks / dependencies:** - [What you need from engineering / design / data / leadership] --- ### 🧠 Reflection (Optional but powerful) > What's one thing from this week I'd do differently? > [Your honest answer — 1–2 sentences] > What's the biggest unknown I'm carrying into next week? > [Name the uncertainty explicitly] --- ## Required Inputs Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked *(assumed, confirm)* and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about). - **Product area or team** you own - **Key metrics this week** (with values and prior week comparison) - **What shipped, slipped, or is blocked** - **Top 3 priorities for next week** - **Any customer insights or signals** (optional) ## Quality Checks - [ ] Metrics include period-over-period comparison (not just raw numbers) - [ ] Every blocked item has an owner and a specific unblocking action - [ ] Next week's priorities have a "why this week" rationale - [ ] Total length is under 400 words (skimmable in 3 minutes) - [ ] Reflection section is honest, not aspirational ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not report metrics without comparing to target or the prior week — absolute numbers without context are not useful - [ ] Do not list blockers without a named owner and proposed resolution — unowned blockers stay blocked - [ ] Do not write a weekly review that is longer than one page — it must be scannable in under 2 minutes - [ ] Do not include more than 3 priorities for next week — a list of 8 "top priorities" means nothing is prioritised - [ ] Do not skip the insights section — observations that inform future decisions are a PM's key value add ## Guidelines - Keep the whole document under 400 words — if stakeholders won't read it, it doesn't exist - The reflection section is for you, not your stakeholders — keep it honest - Always name a clear owner for every blocked item — "the team will figure it out" is a blocker in disguise - Recommend sending this by end of Friday — Monday morning is too late to course-correct - If three weeks of weekly reviews show the same blocked item, escalate immediately ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Doing a weekly PM review." - "Write a weekly update." - "Prepare for Monday planning." - "Review sprint health."
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/discovery-interview-guide/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/job-story-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/user-interview-synthesis/SKILL.md
templates/pm-launch-agent/skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
8d32d25aa3f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mohitagw15856__pm-weekly-review.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 8d32d25aa3f5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Pm Weekly Review skill do?
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Is Pm Weekly Review safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Pm Weekly Review access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (8d32d25aa3f5), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.