Figma User Flow PlannerCAUTION
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Overview
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
8d32d25aa3f5OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: figma-user-flow-planner description: "Plan user flows and screen states for a Figma design before any designing starts. Use when asked to plan a user flow, map out screens for a feature, define screen states, plan a Figma file structure, or work out what needs to be designed before opening Figma. Produces a complete flow map with all screens, states, entry/exit points, and a suggested Figma page structure." --- # Figma User Flow Planner Skill Plans what needs to be designed before a pixel is touched — mapping all screens, states, entry points, and edge cases so designers do not discover missing states mid-build. ## Required Inputs - **Feature or task being designed** - **User type** (who performs this flow?) - **Platform** (iOS / Android / Web / Multi-platform) - **Starting point** (where does the user begin?) - **Known edge cases** (optional) ## Output Structure ### 1. Flow Overview Feature, user, goal, entry points, success exit, failure exits. ### 2. Screen Map | # | Screen name | Type | Triggered by | Notes | |---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | [Screen] | New/Modal/Drawer/Toast | [What triggers] | [Considerations] | Screen types to cover: entry, happy path, loading, success, error (network/validation/permission), empty, first-time/onboarding, edge cases. ### 3. State Matrix **[Screen name]** | State | Trigger | Visual change | Action available | |---|---|---|---| | Default | Page load | [Description] | [What user can do] | | Loading | User taps action | Skeleton/spinner | None | | Error | API failure | Error message | Retry/Go back | | Empty | No data | Empty state | [CTA] | ### 4. Decision Points **Decision: [Name]** - If yes: [Screen N] - If no: [Screen X] ### 5. Suggested Figma File Structure ``` Feature name/ - Cover - Flow Map - Happy Path - Error States - Empty States - Edge Cases - Handoff ``` ### 6. What Not to Design Yet [Explicit out-of-scope items — prevents scope creep] ## Quality Checks - [ ] All three state types covered: loading, error, empty - [ ] All decision points mapped with both branches - [ ] Entry points include all realistic user paths - [ ] Out-of-scope section is explicit - [ ] Figma file structure matches screen map ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not plan only the happy path — all error states, empty states, and edge cases must be mapped before designing starts - [ ] Do not produce a flow map that doesn't match the Figma file structure — the page structure must reflect the flow map - [ ] Do not define screens without specifying all required states — a screen without its variants is an incomplete design scope - [ ] Do not start designing before entry and exit points are fully documented — unclear boundaries cause scope creep - [ ] Do not plan user flows without tying each step back to a user goal — every screen must justify its existence ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Plan the user flow for [feature] in Figma" - "What screens do I need to design for [feature]?" - "Map out the states for [feature] before we start designing" - "Help me structure my Figma file for [feature]" - "What do we need to design before handing this to the developer?"
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/discovery-interview-guide/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/job-story-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/user-interview-synthesis/SKILL.md
templates/pm-launch-agent/skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
8d32d25aa3f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mohitagw15856__figma-user-flow-planner.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 8d32d25aa3f5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Figma User Flow Planner skill do?
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Is Figma User Flow Planner safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Figma User Flow Planner access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (8d32d25aa3f5), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.