Figma Design BriefCAUTION

1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: figma-design-brief
description: "Write a structured design brief for a Figma design task from a product requirement or feature request. Use when asked to write a design brief, create a design spec for Figma, turn a PRD into design requirements, or brief a designer on what to build in Figma. Produces a brief with goals, scope, user flows, components needed, constraints, and success criteria."
---

# Figma Design Brief Skill

Converts a product requirement or feature request into a structured design brief — everything a designer needs to open Figma and start building confidently.

> **Not quite this?** Use `figma-design-qa` when the design already exists and you are checking it against the spec.

## Required Inputs

- **Feature or requirement** (paste PRD snippet, ticket, or describe the feature)
- **User goal** (what is the user trying to accomplish?)
- **Platform** (iOS / Android / Web / Responsive / All)
- **Existing components available** (optional)
- **Timeline** (when does design need to be ready?)


## Programmatic Helper

Contrast ratios cannot be eyeballed. The AA line sits at 4.5:1, and `#777777`
on white is 4.478 (fails) while `#767676` is 4.54 (passes) — no amount of
looking at a screenshot separates those. Compute them:

```bash
npx --yes notugly fix "#8ab4f8" "#ffffff"     # ratio, APCA, and the nearest passing colour
npx --yes notugly onepager <url> --out review.html   # every pairing, printable
npx --yes notugly vision                      # which colours merge for colour-blind viewers
```

`notugly fix` returns the ratio, the APCA lightness contrast, and the closest
colour to the one already chosen that passes — same hue, same chroma. Paste
those numbers into the tables below rather than estimating them.

Deterministic, zero dependencies, and **no model call** — so it costs nothing to
run and gives the same answer every time.

If the brief specifies colours, state the measured ratio for each intended
text/background pairing. A brief that specifies an unreachable pairing wastes a
design cycle before anybody notices.

## Output Structure

### 1. Brief Header
Feature, PM, Designer, Platform, Design due, Dev handoff dates.

### 2. What We Are Designing and Why
- **The goal:** [One sentence — user problem being solved]
- **Context:** [2-3 sentences. Why now? What triggers this?]
- **Success looks like:** [Specific observable outcome]

### 3. User Flows to Design

**Flow N: [Flow name]**
- Entry point: [Where user starts]
- Steps: [Numbered key steps]
- Exit point: [Where flow ends]
- Edge cases: [empty state, error state, loading state]

### 4. Screens Required

| Screen | New / Update | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| [Screen] | New | [Key requirement] |

### 5. Components Needed

| Component | In library? | Action |
|---|---|---|
| [Component] | Yes/No/Needs variant | Use/Create/Extend |

### 6. Constraints and Requirements
- Must haves: [Non-negotiable constraints]
- Must avoid: [Design patterns to not use]
- Accessibility: [WCAG level, touch target sizes]

### 7. Open Questions
- [ ] [Question — with owner]

## Quality Checks
- [ ] Goal is outcome-focused (not "design the feature")
- [ ] All flows include edge cases
- [ ] Components table identifies create vs reuse
- [ ] Constraints include accessibility requirements
- [ ] Open questions have owners

## Anti-Patterns

- [ ] Do not write a design brief that describes the solution — the brief must describe the problem and constraints, not the design answer
- [ ] Do not skip the success criteria — designers need to know what "done" looks like before starting
- [ ] Do not omit existing components to reuse — briefs that ignore the design system lead to inconsistent implementations
- [ ] Do not leave open questions unresolved — escalate them before design work starts, not during it
- [ ] Do not confuse requirements with design instructions — the brief defines what, not how

## Example Trigger Phrases
- "Write a design brief for [feature]"
- "Turn this PRD into a Figma design brief"
- "Brief the designer on what to build for [requirement]"
- "Create a design spec for [feature] for Figma"
- "What does the designer need to know to design [feature]?"

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (5)

templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md

templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/discovery-interview-guide/SKILL.md

templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/job-story-mapper/SKILL.md

templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/user-interview-synthesis/SKILL.md

templates/pm-launch-agent/skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.