Feature Flag GuideCAUTION

1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: feature-flag-guide
description: "Write a feature flag management guide and lifecycle playbook for a service or team — covering flag taxonomy, creation checklist, rollout strategy, monitoring requirements, cleanup policy, and governance. Use when asked to document feature flag practices, create a flag rollout plan, write a feature flag policy, or guide a team on flag lifecycle management. Produces a flag lifecycle playbook, taxonomy reference, per-flag creation template, rollout decision tree, and cleanup checklist."
---

# Feature Flag Guide Skill

Produce a complete feature flag management guide for a service or team — covering how flags are named and categorised, how to create and roll out a flag safely, what to monitor during rollout, when and how to clean up flags, and who is responsible for each stage. Feature flags without discipline become permanent technical debt. This guide gives the team a repeatable process so flags are created intentionally, rolled out safely, and removed when done.

## Required Inputs

Ask for these if not already provided:
- **Service or team name** — scope of the guide
- **Feature flag platform** — LaunchDarkly, Split, Unleash, Flagsmith, Flipt, or a custom/in-house solution
- **Flag being documented** (if writing a per-flag guide) or "general guide" (if writing team-wide policy)
- **Rollout constraints** — any compliance, data privacy, or contractual constraints on who can see a feature (e.g. HIPAA, EU-only, enterprise customers only)

## Output Format

---

# Feature Flag Management Guide: [Service / Team Name]

**Team:** [Team name] | **Platform:** [LaunchDarkly / Split / Unleash / Custom]
**Document owner:** [Name] | **Last updated:** [Date]
**Review cycle:** Quarterly, and whenever the flag platform changes

---

## 1. Flag Taxonomy

Every flag belongs to exactly one category. The category determines default behaviour, who can enable it in production, and when it must be cleaned up.

| Type | Purpose | Default state | Production gate | Max lifetime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Release flag** | Controls rollout of a new feature — decouples deploy from release | Off | Tech lead approval | 90 days from feature launch |
| **Experiment flag** | A/B or multivariate test — measures impact of a change | Off (control group) | Product + tech lead | Duration of experiment + 30 days |
| **Ops flag** | Operational control — circuit breaker, kill switch, throttle | On (normal behaviour) | On-call engineer can toggle | Indefinite (review annually) |
| **Permission flag** | Gates access by user segment, tier, or region | Off (restricted) | Product + Account owner | Indefinite (review annually) |

**When in doubt:** If the flag is temporary (tied to a specific feature launch), it is a Release flag. If it will exist forever as a control knob, it is an Ops flag.

---

## 2. Flag Naming Convention

All flags must follow this naming scheme:

```
[type]-[service]-[feature-description]
```

| Segment | Values | Example |
|---|---|---|
| type | `release`, `exp`, `ops`, `perm` | `release` |
| service | Short service identifier, lowercase, hyphenated | `payments` |
| feature-description | Kebab-case description, max 5 words | `new-checkout-flow` |

**Full examples:**
- `release-payments-new-checkout-flow` — release flag for a new checkout feature in the payments service
- `exp-search-personalized-ranking` — experiment on personalized search ranking
- `ops-api-rate-limit-override` — operational flag to override API rate limits
- `perm-dashboard-beta-users-only` — permission flag gating dashboard for beta users

**Do not:**
- Use ticket numbers in flag names (`release-JIRA-1234` → not searchable or self-describing)
- Use dates in flag names (`release-dark-mode-jan-2024` → flags outlive their dates)
- Use vague names (`release-new-thing` → not useful when you have 50 flags)

---

## 3. Flag Creation Checklist

Complete every item before creating a flag in the production environment.

**Before creating the flag:**
- [ ] Flag type determined from taxonomy (Section 1)
- [ ] Flag name follows naming convention (Section 2)
- [ ] Flag owner assigned — one named engineer responsible for cleanup
- [ ] Cleanup date set in the flag description field (for Release and Experiment flags)
- [ ] Rollout strategy defined — see Section 4
- [ ] Monitoring plan defined — see Section 5
- [ ] Code review approved with flag guard in place

**Flag description field (required):**
```
Type: [Release / Experiment / Ops / Permission]
Owner: [Name]
Linked ticket: [JIRA-XXXX or GitHub issue URL]
Purpose: [One sentence — what this flag controls]
Cleanup by: [Date — required for Release and Experiment flags; "Annual review" for Ops/Permission]
Rollout plan: [Link to this document or inline summary]
```

**Code requirements:**
```python
# Good — behaviour is clear when flag is off, and cleanup is obvious
if flag_client.is_enabled("release-[service]-[feature]", user_context):
    return new_feature_handler(request)
else:
    return existing_handler(request)

# Bad — nested flags, ternaries, and implicit defaults make cleanup error-prone
result = new_handler() if (f1 and not f2) or f3 else old_handler()
```

---

## 4. Rollout Strategy

### Decision Tree

Use this decision tree to pick the right rollout strategy for a Release or Experiment flag:

```
Is the change reversible without a deploy?
├── No → Use an Ops flag with manual enable, not a percentage rollout
└── Yes → Continue

Is there a user-level identifier available (user ID, session ID)?
├── No → Use server-side percentage (stateless, but inconsistent per user)
└── Yes → Use user-based percentage (consistent experience per user) ← preferred

Is the change risky (touches payments, auth, or data writes)?
├── Yes → Start at 1% → 5% → 25% → 50% → 100%, with 24-hour holds
└── No → Start at 10% → 50% → 100%, with 4-hour holds

Does the change affect specific customer tiers or geographies?
├── Yes → Use segment-based targeting, not percentage rollout
└──

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (5)

templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md

templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/discovery-interview-guide/SKILL.md

templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/job-story-mapper/SKILL.md

templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/user-interview-synthesis/SKILL.md

templates/pm-launch-agent/skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.