Cs Health ScorecardCAUTION
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Overview
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
8d32d25aa3f5OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: cs-health-scorecard description: "Build a customer health scorecard for a specific account. Use when asked to score account health, assess renewal risk, build a health dashboard, or evaluate an account's likelihood to renew or expand. Produces a structured health scorecard with a RAG status, dimension scores, key risks, and recommended actions." --- # Customer Health Scorecard Skill Produce a structured, data-driven health scorecard for a customer account — giving the CSM and leadership a clear view of renewal risk, expansion potential, and the actions needed to move the account in the right direction. ## Reads from / Writes to the Brain If a [`professional-brain`](../professional-brain/SKILL.md) (`brain/`) exists, ground in it instead of re-asking for what you already know: - **Read first:** the account's `entities/` file, its `stakeholders/` (champion, economic buyer, detractors), and `knowledge/`. Run `python3 ../professional-brain/scripts/brain_query.py ./brain "<account name>"` and carry each fact's provenance tag through. - **📥 Propose to the Brain:** after producing, propose recording the health verdict + key risks to the account `entities/` file, and a renewal-risk entry to `decisions/` if a call is made, each provenance-tagged. Show them, get a yes, then write with `../professional-brain/scripts/brain_write.py ... --commit` (append-only, dry-run by default). ## Required Inputs Ask for these if not already provided: - **Account name** and tier (enterprise / mid-market / SMB) - **Contract value** (ARR) and **renewal date** - **Product usage data** — logins, DAU/MAU ratio, key feature adoption - **Support data** — open tickets, CSAT or NPS score, recent escalations - **Engagement data** — last QBR date, executive sponsor status, champion name - **Commercial data** — payment history, expansion conversations, seats used vs. licensed - **Any known risks or recent changes** at the account ## Scoring Framework Score each dimension 1–5. Weight as shown. Calculate weighted total out of 100. | Dimension | Weight | What to Score | |---|---|---| | **Product Adoption** | 30% | DAU/MAU ratio, breadth of features used, power users identified | | **Engagement** | 20% | QBR cadence, executive sponsor active, champion strength | | **Outcomes** | 20% | Customer hitting their stated goals / success metrics | | **Support Health** | 15% | Ticket volume trend, unresolved escalations, CSAT | | **Commercial** | 15% | On-time payments, seats utilised, expansion signals | **Score → RAG conversion:** - 80–100: Green (healthy, renew likely) - 60–79: Amber (at risk, needs attention) - 0–59: Red (high churn risk, escalate) ## Programmatic Helper This skill ships with a stdlib-only Python script that applies the weights above and converts the weighted total to a RAG status — so the headline score is computed identically every time and weights always sum to 100%. ```bash # Five scores 1-5 in order: adoption engagement outcomes support commercial python3 scripts/health_score.py --scores 4 3 4 2 5 --account "Acme Corp" # Or from JSON (lets you override the default weights per account/segment) python3 scripts/health_score.py --input account.json ``` It returns the per-dimension weighted points, the **total out of 100**, and the **RAG band** (Green ≥80, Amber 60–79, Red <60) with a one-line next step. Run it to set the headline number, then write the dimension detail and actions below around it. Add `--json` for downstream tooling. ## Output Format --- # Customer Health Scorecard: [Account Name] **CSM:** [Name] | **Tier:** [Enterprise / Mid-Market / SMB] **ARR:** £/$/€[X] | **Renewal date:** [Date] | **Days to renewal:** [N] **Overall health:** [Green / Amber / Red] — [Score]/100 **Last updated:** [Date] --- ## Health Score Summary | Dimension | Score (1–5) | Weight | Weighted Score | Trend | |---|---|---|---|---| | Product Adoption | [1–5] | 30% | [X] | ↑ / → / ↓ | | Engagement | [1–5] | 20% | [X] | ↑ / → / ↓ | | Outcomes | [1–5] | 20% | [X] | ↑ / → / ↓ | | Support Health | [1–5] | 15% | [X] | ↑ / → / ↓ | | Commercial | [1–5] | 15% | [X] | ↑ / → / ↓ | | **Total** | — | 100% | **[X]/100** | | --- ## Dimension Detail ### Product Adoption — [Score]/5 - **DAU/MAU ratio:** [X]% (benchmark: >25% = healthy) - **Key features adopted:** [List features in use] - **Features not adopted:** [List unused high-value features] - **Power users identified:** [Yes / No — how many] - **Assessment:** [1–2 sentences on adoption health] ### Engagement — [Score]/5 - **Last QBR:** [Date] — [Outcome summary] - **Next QBR:** [Scheduled / Overdue] - **Executive sponsor:** [Active / Passive / Vacant] - **Champion:** [Name, role, strength: strong / moderate / weak] - **Assessment:** [1–2 sentences] ### Outcomes — [Score]/5 - **Customer's stated goals:** [List 2–3 goals from onboarding or last QBR] - **Progress against goals:** [On track / Partial / Off track] - **Evidence of value:** [Metric or quote that demonstrates ROI] - **Assessment:** [1–2 sentences] ### Support Health — [Score]/5 - **Open tickets:** [N] (priority breakdown: P1: X, P2: X, P3: X) - **CSAT / NPS:** [Score] (benchmark: >8 CSAT / >30 NPS = healthy) - **Unresolved escalations:** [Yes / No — details if yes] - **Ticket trend (last 90 days):** Increasing / Stable / Decreasing - **Assessment:** [1–2 sentences] ### Commercial — [Score]/5 - **Seats licensed:** [N] | **Seats active:** [N] ([X]% utilisation) - **Payment history:** [On time / Late — details] - **Expansion signals:** [Yes — describe / No] - **Downgrade or cancellation signals:** [Yes — describe / No] - **Assessment:** [1–2 sentences] --- ## Top Risks | Risk | Severity | Mitigation | |---|---|---| | [Risk description] | High / Medium / Low | [Specific action to mitigate] | --- ## Recommended Actions **Immediate (this week):** 1. [Action — owner — deadline] **This month:** 1. [Action — owner — deadline] **Before renewal:** 1. [Action — owner — deadline] --- ## Renewal Fore
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/assumption-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/discovery-interview-guide/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/job-story-mapper/SKILL.md
templates/pm-discovery-agent/skills/user-interview-synthesis/SKILL.md
templates/pm-launch-agent/skills/content-calendar/SKILL.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
8d32d25aa3f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mohitagw15856__cs-health-scorecard.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 8d32d25aa3f5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Cs Health Scorecard skill do?
1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in Anthropic's plugin directory. Plus a typed decision layer: which skill, is it safe, ship or slip. Free in-browser or npx pm-
Is Cs Health Scorecard safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Cs Health Scorecard access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (8d32d25aa3f5), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.