Atlas / Skills / microsoft / Apm Strategy

Apm StrategySAFE

skills/microsoft/apm-strategy

Agent Package Manager

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
MIT
Stars
3,981
01

Overview

Agent Package Manager

Read from source at commit 2ea90c57fbfcOBSERVED · 2026-10-08
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: apm-strategy
description: >-
  Activate for changes to project positioning, release communication,
  community-facing artifacts, or breaking-change decisions in
  microsoft/apm. Triggers on README, MANIFESTO, PRD, CHANGELOG, release
  workflows, and issue templates.
---

# APM Strategy Skill

[APM CEO persona](../../../.apm/agents/apm-ceo.agent.md)

## When to activate

- Edits to `README.md`, `MANIFESTO.md`, `PRD.md`, `APPROACH.md`
- Edits to `CHANGELOG.md` (especially Unreleased and version sections)
- Changes to `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` or `pull_request_template.md`
- Release-pipeline workflow changes
  (`.github/workflows/build-release.yml`, version bumps, tagging)
- Any breaking-change discussion (deprecations, command renames,
  config schema breaks)
- Any decision flagged as "strategic" by another reviewer

## Key rules

- Ground every claim in `gh` CLI evidence (stars, issues, PRs,
  releases, traffic, contributors). No vibes-based assertions.
- Every breaking change ships with a `CHANGELOG.md` entry and a
  one-line migration note.
- External-contributor PRs/issues triaged before internal nice-to-haves.
- Position against incumbents; never name-drop them in shipped copy.
- Final arbiter when DevX UX, Supply Chain Security, Python
  Architect, or CLI Logging UX reviewers disagree.
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-08 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 2ea90c57fbfcfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/microsoft__apm-strategy.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-082ea90c57fbfcSAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Apm Strategy skill do?

Agent Package Manager

Is Apm Strategy safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Apm Strategy access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (2ea90c57fbfc), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement