Atlas / Skills / matlab / Matlab Review Code

Matlab Review CodeSAFE

skills/matlab/matlab-review-code

The MATLAB Agentic Toolkit brings proven MATLAB capabilities to AI agents, making engineering and scientific workflows agent-ready.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.1
Hosts
—
License
NOASSERTION
Stars
1,164
01

Overview

The MATLAB Agentic Toolkit brings proven MATLAB capabilities to AI agents, making engineering and scientific workflows agent-ready.

Read from source at commit 58967e6f32b5OBSERVED · 2026-10-14
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: matlab-review-code
description: Review MATLAB code for quality, performance, maintainability, and adherence to MathWorks coding standards. Uses check_matlab_code and matlab_coding_guidelines. Use when reviewing code, checking style, finding code smells, assessing quality, or preparing code for handoff or publication.
license: https://www.mathworks.com/content/dam/mathworks/license/pmrl/license.md
metadata:
  author: MathWorks
  version: "1.1"
---

# Code Review

Systematically review MATLAB code for quality, correctness, performance, and adherence to MathWorks coding conventions using static analysis and manual inspection patterns.

## When to Use

- User asks to review, audit, or improve code quality
- User wants to check adherence to MathWorks coding standards
- Preparing code for handoff, publication, or open-source release
- After a significant implementation — verify before committing
- User reports "code smells" or asks for cleanup suggestions

## When NOT to Use

- User wants to debug a runtime error — use `matlab-debug-code` instead
- User wants to optimize performance — use performance profiling skills
- User wants to generate tests — use `matlab-write-tests` instead

## Workflow

1. **Run static analysis** — Use `check_matlab_code` MCP tool on all target files
2. **Load coding standards** — Read the `matlab_coding_guidelines` MCP resource
3. **Check naming** — Verify functions, classes, variables, and files follow conventions
4. **Review function signatures** — Arguments blocks, input/output counts, name-value patterns
5. **Assess structure** — Function length, nesting depth, complexity
6. **Check patterns** — Vectorization, preallocation, modern API usage
7. **Summarize** — Report findings by severity: errors > warnings > suggestions

## Step 1: Static Analysis

Use the `check_matlab_code` MCP tool on each file. Then inspect results programmatically:

```matlab
info = checkcode("src/computeArea.m", "-struct");
for k = 1:numel(info)
    fprintf('Line %d (col %d-%d): %s\n', ...
        info(k).line, info(k).column(1), info(k).column(end), info(k).message);
end
```

For directory-wide analysis (R2022b+):

```matlab
issues = codeIssues("src");
disp(issues.Issues);
```

## Step 2: Load Coding Standards

Read the `matlab_coding_guidelines` MCP resource to get the authoritative MathWorks coding standards. Use these as the baseline for all naming, formatting, and structural checks.

## Review Checklist

### Naming

| Element | Convention | Example |
|---------|-----------|---------|
| Functions | lowerCamelCase, verb phrase | `computeArea`, `loadData` |
| Classes | PascalCase | `SensorReader`, `DataProcessor` |
| Variables | lowerCamelCase, descriptive | `sampleRate` not `sr` |
| Constants | UPPER_SNAKE or `Constant` property | `MAX_ITERATIONS` |
| Test files | `t` prefix | `tComputeArea.m` |
| App files | PascalCase | `DashboardApp.m` |
| File = function | File name matches primary function | `computeArea.m` → `function computeArea` |

### Function Quality

| Check | Standard | Severity |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Input count | Max 6 positional inputs | Warning |
| Output count | Max 4 outputs | Warning |
| Validation | `arguments` block present | Warning |
| Name-value args | `options.Name` pattern (not `varargin`) | Suggestion |
| Length | Flag if >50 lines | Suggestion |
| Nesting | Flag if >3 levels deep | Warning |
| `end` keyword | All functions terminated with `end` | Warning |
| Help text | H1 line present for public functions | Suggestion |

### Code Patterns

| Check | Modern | Legacy (flag it) |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Multi-panel figures | `tiledlayout`/`nexttile` | `subplot` |
| Date/time | `datetime` | `datenum`/`datestr` |
| Strings | `string` type | char arrays for text |
| Vectorization | `.*`, `./`, logical indexing | Loops over elements |
| Preallocation | `zeros(n,1)` before loop | Growing arrays in loops |
| Data containers | `table`/`timetable` | Raw matrices for named data |
| Dynamic eval | Direct function calls | `eval`, `evalin`, `assignin` |

### High-Severity Flags

These should always be reported as errors:

- Use of `eval`, `assignin`, or `evalin` — security and maintainability risk
- Growing arrays inside loops without preallocation — performance
- Shadowing built-in functions — `sum = 5` shadows `sum()`
- Missing `arguments` block in public-facing functions
- Hardcoded file paths with backslashes

### What checkcode Misses

`check_matlab_code` does NOT catch all issues. After running static analysis, **always scan the source code** for these common problems that require visual inspection:

- **`subplot` usage** — not flagged by checkcode, but should use `tiledlayout`/`nexttile`
- **Shadowed builtin variables** — `sum = 0` shadows `sum()`, checkcode may not flag it
- **Deep nesting** (>3 levels) — checkcode does not measure nesting depth
- **Hardcoded backslash paths** — checkcode flags unused variables but not path style
- **Magic numbers** — unlabeled constants in code (e.g., `if length(x) > 10`)
- **Missing H1 help text** — checkcode does not require help text

Do not skip Steps 3-6 of the workflow just because checkcode returns few results.

## Patterns

### Complexity Assessment

```matlab
function complexity = assessComplexity(filePath)
%assessComplexity Estimate cyclomatic complexity of a MATLAB function.

    arguments
        filePath (1,1) string {mustBeFile}
    end

    code = fileread(filePath);
    branchKeywords = ["if " "elseif " "case " "while " "for " "catch "];
    complexity = 1;
    for kw = branchKeywords
        complexity = complexity + numel(strfind(code, kw));
    end
end
```

### Check Toolbox Dependencies

```matlab
[files, products] = matlab.codetools.requiredFilesAndProducts('src/myFunction.m');
fprintf('Required products:\n');
for k = 1:numel(products)
    fprintf('  %s (ID: %d)\n', products(k).Name, products(k).ProductNumber);
end
```

### Review Report Format

Present findings in this f
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-14 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 58967e6f32b5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/matlab__matlab-review-code.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-1458967e6f32b5SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Matlab Review Code skill do?

The MATLAB Agentic Toolkit brings proven MATLAB capabilities to AI agents, making engineering and scientific workflows agent-ready.

Is Matlab Review Code safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Matlab Review Code access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (58967e6f32b5), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement