Matlab Review CodeSAFE
The MATLAB Agentic Toolkit brings proven MATLAB capabilities to AI agents, making engineering and scientific workflows agent-ready.
Overview
The MATLAB Agentic Toolkit brings proven MATLAB capabilities to AI agents, making engineering and scientific workflows agent-ready.
58967e6f32b5OBSERVED · 2026-10-14What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: matlab-review-code
description: Review MATLAB code for quality, performance, maintainability, and adherence to MathWorks coding standards. Uses check_matlab_code and matlab_coding_guidelines. Use when reviewing code, checking style, finding code smells, assessing quality, or preparing code for handoff or publication.
license: https://www.mathworks.com/content/dam/mathworks/license/pmrl/license.md
metadata:
author: MathWorks
version: "1.1"
---
# Code Review
Systematically review MATLAB code for quality, correctness, performance, and adherence to MathWorks coding conventions using static analysis and manual inspection patterns.
## When to Use
- User asks to review, audit, or improve code quality
- User wants to check adherence to MathWorks coding standards
- Preparing code for handoff, publication, or open-source release
- After a significant implementation — verify before committing
- User reports "code smells" or asks for cleanup suggestions
## When NOT to Use
- User wants to debug a runtime error — use `matlab-debug-code` instead
- User wants to optimize performance — use performance profiling skills
- User wants to generate tests — use `matlab-write-tests` instead
## Workflow
1. **Run static analysis** — Use `check_matlab_code` MCP tool on all target files
2. **Load coding standards** — Read the `matlab_coding_guidelines` MCP resource
3. **Check naming** — Verify functions, classes, variables, and files follow conventions
4. **Review function signatures** — Arguments blocks, input/output counts, name-value patterns
5. **Assess structure** — Function length, nesting depth, complexity
6. **Check patterns** — Vectorization, preallocation, modern API usage
7. **Summarize** — Report findings by severity: errors > warnings > suggestions
## Step 1: Static Analysis
Use the `check_matlab_code` MCP tool on each file. Then inspect results programmatically:
```matlab
info = checkcode("src/computeArea.m", "-struct");
for k = 1:numel(info)
fprintf('Line %d (col %d-%d): %s\n', ...
info(k).line, info(k).column(1), info(k).column(end), info(k).message);
end
```
For directory-wide analysis (R2022b+):
```matlab
issues = codeIssues("src");
disp(issues.Issues);
```
## Step 2: Load Coding Standards
Read the `matlab_coding_guidelines` MCP resource to get the authoritative MathWorks coding standards. Use these as the baseline for all naming, formatting, and structural checks.
## Review Checklist
### Naming
| Element | Convention | Example |
|---------|-----------|---------|
| Functions | lowerCamelCase, verb phrase | `computeArea`, `loadData` |
| Classes | PascalCase | `SensorReader`, `DataProcessor` |
| Variables | lowerCamelCase, descriptive | `sampleRate` not `sr` |
| Constants | UPPER_SNAKE or `Constant` property | `MAX_ITERATIONS` |
| Test files | `t` prefix | `tComputeArea.m` |
| App files | PascalCase | `DashboardApp.m` |
| File = function | File name matches primary function | `computeArea.m` → `function computeArea` |
### Function Quality
| Check | Standard | Severity |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Input count | Max 6 positional inputs | Warning |
| Output count | Max 4 outputs | Warning |
| Validation | `arguments` block present | Warning |
| Name-value args | `options.Name` pattern (not `varargin`) | Suggestion |
| Length | Flag if >50 lines | Suggestion |
| Nesting | Flag if >3 levels deep | Warning |
| `end` keyword | All functions terminated with `end` | Warning |
| Help text | H1 line present for public functions | Suggestion |
### Code Patterns
| Check | Modern | Legacy (flag it) |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Multi-panel figures | `tiledlayout`/`nexttile` | `subplot` |
| Date/time | `datetime` | `datenum`/`datestr` |
| Strings | `string` type | char arrays for text |
| Vectorization | `.*`, `./`, logical indexing | Loops over elements |
| Preallocation | `zeros(n,1)` before loop | Growing arrays in loops |
| Data containers | `table`/`timetable` | Raw matrices for named data |
| Dynamic eval | Direct function calls | `eval`, `evalin`, `assignin` |
### High-Severity Flags
These should always be reported as errors:
- Use of `eval`, `assignin`, or `evalin` — security and maintainability risk
- Growing arrays inside loops without preallocation — performance
- Shadowing built-in functions — `sum = 5` shadows `sum()`
- Missing `arguments` block in public-facing functions
- Hardcoded file paths with backslashes
### What checkcode Misses
`check_matlab_code` does NOT catch all issues. After running static analysis, **always scan the source code** for these common problems that require visual inspection:
- **`subplot` usage** — not flagged by checkcode, but should use `tiledlayout`/`nexttile`
- **Shadowed builtin variables** — `sum = 0` shadows `sum()`, checkcode may not flag it
- **Deep nesting** (>3 levels) — checkcode does not measure nesting depth
- **Hardcoded backslash paths** — checkcode flags unused variables but not path style
- **Magic numbers** — unlabeled constants in code (e.g., `if length(x) > 10`)
- **Missing H1 help text** — checkcode does not require help text
Do not skip Steps 3-6 of the workflow just because checkcode returns few results.
## Patterns
### Complexity Assessment
```matlab
function complexity = assessComplexity(filePath)
%assessComplexity Estimate cyclomatic complexity of a MATLAB function.
arguments
filePath (1,1) string {mustBeFile}
end
code = fileread(filePath);
branchKeywords = ["if " "elseif " "case " "while " "for " "catch "];
complexity = 1;
for kw = branchKeywords
complexity = complexity + numel(strfind(code, kw));
end
end
```
### Check Toolbox Dependencies
```matlab
[files, products] = matlab.codetools.requiredFilesAndProducts('src/myFunction.m');
fprintf('Required products:\n');
for k = 1:numel(products)
fprintf(' %s (ID: %d)\n', products(k).Name, products(k).ProductNumber);
end
```
### Review Report Format
Present findings in this fTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
58967e6f32b5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/matlab__matlab-review-code.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | 58967e6f32b5 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Matlab Review Code skill do?
The MATLAB Agentic Toolkit brings proven MATLAB capabilities to AI agents, making engineering and scientific workflows agent-ready.
Is Matlab Review Code safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Matlab Review Code access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (58967e6f32b5), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.