Legibility CheckSAFE
Intercept and inspect Coding Agent API traffic from Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Cursor CLI, OpenCode, Kimi/Kimi Code, Pi, and Hermes in a local trace viewer.
Overview
Intercept and inspect Coding Agent API traffic from Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Cursor CLI, OpenCode, Kimi/Kimi Code, Pi, and Hermes in a local trace viewer.
4c2d422a35f5OBSERVED · 2026-10-12Install
Commands as the repository documents them. They are shown, not run.
uv run python scripts/check_legibility.py
uv run python scripts/check_legibility.py && echo "All clear"
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: legibility-check description: Validate maintainer docs structure, standards freshness, manifest paths, and plan state. Run this after modifying any file under .agents/docs/standards/, .agents/docs/plans/, .agents/docs/architecture/, or AGENTS.md — it catches stale metadata, broken manifest paths, and plan state drift before CI does. user_invocable: true --- # Legibility Check Run deterministic checks for maintainer docs that mirror what CI enforces via `.github/workflows/legibility.yml`. Catching these locally saves a round-trip to CI. ## What it checks 1. **Standards freshness** — every `.agents/docs/standards/*.md` must have frontmatter with `owner`, `last_reviewed` (ISO date), and `source_of_truth`. Files reviewed more than 60 days ago produce a warning. 2. **Architecture manifest** — every path listed in `.agents/docs/architecture/manifest.yaml` under `expected_paths:` must exist in the repo. 3. **Plan state drift** — every `.agents/docs/plans/**/*.md` must have a `status` frontmatter field (`active`, `completed`, or `cancelled`). Completed plans must not contain unchecked `- [ ]` checkboxes (outside fenced code blocks). ## Run ```bash uv run python scripts/check_legibility.py ``` Options: - `--freshness-days N` — change the staleness threshold (default: 60) - `--strict-freshness` — promote stale warnings to failures - `--repo-root PATH` — override repo root (default: cwd) ## Fixing common failures | Failure | Fix | |---------|-----| | `missing frontmatter key 'X'` | Add the missing key to the YAML frontmatter block at the top of the file | | `last_reviewed must be ISO date` | Use `YYYY-MM-DD` format | | `last_reviewed ... is stale` | Update `last_reviewed` to today's date after reviewing the content | | `expected path missing: X` | Either create the file or remove the stale entry from `manifest.yaml` | | `status must be one of [...]` | Add `status: active` (or `completed`/`cancelled`) to plan frontmatter | | `completed plan still contains unchecked TODO` | Check off remaining items or change status back to `active` | ## After fixing Re-run the check to confirm all issues are resolved before committing: ```bash uv run python scripts/check_legibility.py && echo "All clear" ```
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
.claude/skills
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4c2d422a35f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/liaohch3__legibility-check.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 4c2d422a35f5 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Legibility Check skill do?
Intercept and inspect Coding Agent API traffic from Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Cursor CLI, OpenCode, Kimi/Kimi Code, Pi, and Hermes in a local trace viewer.
Is Legibility Check safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Legibility Check access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4c2d422a35f5), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.