Remembering ConversationsSAFE
🧠 Curated collection of 1209+ best OpenClaw skills — weekly updated by MyClaw.ai
Overview
🧠 Curated collection of 1209+ best OpenClaw skills — weekly updated by MyClaw.ai
4f3b4a2a472eOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned | |
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: remembering-conversations description: Use when user asks 'how should I...' or 'what's the best approach...' after exploring code, OR when you've tried to solve something and are stuck, OR for unfamiliar workflows, OR when user references past work. Searches conversation history. --- # Remembering Conversations **Core principle:** Search before reinventing. Searching costs nothing; reinventing or repeating mistakes costs everything. ## Mandatory: Use the Search Agent **YOU MUST dispatch the search-conversations agent for any historical search.** Announce: "Dispatching search agent to find [topic]." Then use the Task tool with `subagent_type: "search-conversations"`: ``` Task tool: description: "Search past conversations for [topic]" prompt: "Search for [specific query or topic]. Focus on [what you're looking for - e.g., decisions, patterns, gotchas, code examples]." subagent_type: "search-conversations" ``` The agent will: 1. Search with the `search` tool 2. Read top 2-5 results with the `show` tool 3. Synthesize findings (200-1000 words) 4. Return actionable insights + sources **Saves 50-100x context vs. loading raw conversations.** ## When to Use You often get value out of consulting your episodic memory once you understand what you're being asked. Search memory in these situations: **After understanding the task:** - User asks "how should I..." or "what's the best approach..." - You've explored current codebase and need to make architectural decisions - User asks for implementation approach after describing what they want **When you're stuck:** - You've investigated a problem and can't find the solution - Facing a complex problem without obvious solution in current code - Need to follow an unfamiliar workflow or process **When historical signals are present:** - User says "last time", "before", "we discussed", "you implemented" - User asks "why did we...", "what was the reason..." - User says "do you remember...", "what do we know about..." **Don't search first:** - For current codebase structure (use Grep/Read to explore first) - For info in current conversation - Before understanding what you're being asked to do ## Direct Tool Access (Discouraged) You CAN use MCP tools directly, but DON'T: - `mcp__plugin_episodic-memory_episodic-memory__search` - `mcp__plugin_episodic-memory_episodic-memory__show` Using these directly wastes your context window. Always dispatch the agent instead. See MCP-TOOLS.md for complete API reference if needed for advanced usage.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | WARN |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
<key>k5Ey9KFlkqpj+SDkUw+5ED9lTA3En/qUi0zdrydUCH3kMWTE3Eh65NXnFCaxlY2omY2JHnlEoK7Li7oOEvM7eG5VPdcO/sFlMfoCRdnLYdepJ+uLzYwOWR8W4yQVve/clxVFTVRL4DFleKInGdpAxIbHZT2yi4ADAMENls1N1XSLojRuqXePXDeAT/4Mv4TTx0s
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f3b4a2a472efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/leoyeai__remembering-conversations.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f3b4a2a472e | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Remembering Conversations skill do?
🧠 Curated collection of 1209+ best OpenClaw skills — weekly updated by MyClaw.ai
Is Remembering Conversations safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Remembering Conversations access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Remembering Conversations work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code and openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f3b4a2a472e), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.