Agent skill · Audited from source
Tdd
skill · kdlbs/kandevAGPL-3.0 licenceAudited 18 Oct 2026 · source 786d4817799e
Is it safe? With care — CAUTION, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 786d4817799e and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. The audit raised 7 findings, 0 critical or high. What it does: Implement changes using Test-Driven Development (Red-Green-Refactor). Use for code changes that need coverage or requested test-value audits.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Tdd (kdlbs/kandev)”. Retrieved 18 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/kdlbs/tdd
4 skills are called “Tdd”. You are viewing kdlbs/kandev.
- kdlbs/kandev★ 972!CAUTION
- alirezarezvani/claude-skills★ 28k!CAUTION
- cursor/plugins★ 11k✓SAFE
- udecode/dotai★ 1.2k✓SAFE
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 18 Oct 2026
CAUTION means the audit found things worth knowing before you trust this skill. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | WARN | 6 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | PASS | 1 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (7)
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .claude/agents
.claude/agents
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .claude/skills
.claude/skills
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
LOWInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .github/CLAUDE.md
.github/CLAUDE.md
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
LOWInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · CLAUDE.md
CLAUDE.md
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
LOWInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · apps/backend/CLAUDE.md
apps/backend/CLAUDE.md
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
LOWFilesystem / pathfs.traversal · apps/web/e2e/tests/system/licenses-page.spec.ts:1
import { test, expect } from "../../fixtures/test-base";- Why
- No further detail recorded for this rule.
- Fix
- —
INFOInventory / provenanceinv.oversize · apps/web/generated/licenses.json
apps/web/generated/licenses.json
- Why
- 1506638 bytes not read
- Fix
- —
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 786d4817799e · 18 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publisherkdlbs GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderkdlbs/kandev/.agents/skills/tddThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceAGPL-3.0As the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict786d4817799eA new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedPushed today
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Implement changes using Test-Driven Development (Red-Green-Refactor). Use for code changes that need coverage or requested test-value audits.
--- name: tdd description: Implement changes using Test-Driven Development (Red-Green-Refactor). Use for code changes that need coverage or requested test-value audits. --- # TDD ## Execution Context Use this procedure directly in the primary conversation for every code change, regardless of size. The user may switch that conversation to the lower-cost implementation model before beginning the Red-Green-Refactor cycle. Implement code changes using strict Red-Green-Refactor. Iron law: **no production code without a failing test first.** Wrote code before a test? Delete it. Start over from a failing test. ## Related skills - **`/e2e`** — Follow this procedure when the current task needs Playwright E2E coverage. - **`/pr-fixup`** — After the task-defined checks pass and the PR opens, use it only for CI or actionable reviewer findings. ## When to use - Bug fixes — write a test that reproduces the bug before fixing - New functions, methods, or utilities - Refactoring existing logic that lacks tests **Skip** for: pure UI components (we don't test React components), config files, generated code. For UI rendering bugs, prefer extracting or using a pure helper and testing that helper. Add Playwright only when the behavior is truly visual or integration-level. Avoid adding React component tests just to assert DOM output; that does not match this project's testing convention. ## Test-value gate Before adding or changing a test, answer these questions: 1. What observable behavior, invariant, or independent contract does it protect? 2. What credible regression makes its assertion fail? 3. Why does existing coverage miss that regression? 4. Does it require a production export, flag, or injection hook that only tests use? Resolve a missing answer before writing the test. Prefer extending an existing case over repeating the same contract. Give each contract a primary test owner at the boundary that can expose its failure. Keep additional layers for distinct transport, lifecycle, platform, or input-handler risks. For test-only seams, first look for proof through an existing production boundary. Keep necessary performance instrumentation only with a named invariant and no simpler proof. For a requested test audit or consolidation, load [test-audit.md](references/test-audit.md). Do not start a broad cleanup as part of ordinary TDD. ## Determine test scope When implementing a UI work order, read its ASCII UI preview and linked plan before changing the surface. Use the structural requirements to guide the existing rendered checks; do not test ASCII whitespace or treat it as exact pixel geometry. Keep any design revisions synchronized through `docs/specs/guide/plans-and-work-orders.md#ascii-ui-previews`. - **Go unit** (`apps/backend/`): test file next to source as `*_test.go`. Run: ```bash cd apps/backend && go test -v -run TestName ./internal/path/to/package/... ``` - **TypeScript unit** (`apps/web/lib/`): test file next to source as `*.test.ts`. Run: ```bash cd apps && pnpm --filter @kandev/web test -- --run path/to/file.test.ts ``` - **Web E2E** (`apps/web/e2e/`): follow `/e2e` when the current task needs Playwright tests. For Go test fixtures, load [backend-tests.md](references/backend-tests.md). Choose the right level: - **Unit:** pure logic or isolated service behavior. - **Integration:** handler/service/repository boundaries, SQLite-backed flows, filesystem behavior, or process boundaries. - **E2E:** critical user-facing browser flows; keep these focused and use `/e2e`. Prefer state/output assertions over interaction assertions. Mock only slow, nondeterministic, or external boundaries; use real implementations or fakes when they keep the test deterministic. When one behavior has separate wheel, keyboard, touch, or pointer handlers, inventory and test every handler with distinct branching. For input at a hard boundary where the underlying position cannot change, dispatch the input event or gesture directly. Cover the eligible direction at the boundary, the wrong direction or off-boundary no-op, one physical gesture firing at most once, and listener cleanup when the change adds subscriptions. An E2E case for one input modality does not cover the other handler paths. When a work order names an `AC-*` acceptance criterion, keep the mapping visible in the test name or a nearby `@covers AC-...` comment. Do not copy the complete requirement into the test. For failure-path tests, inject the error at the boundary the production code claims to handle and exercise the real downstream call chain; do not short-circuit by mocking the handler under test. When production code has a defensive nil/fallback branch or sanitizes an internal error into a public error, inject that alternate return at the interface boundary and assert the public result plus absence of internal details or sensitive content. For a test asserting that a side effect does not occur, enable every prerequisite that would otherwise cause it and add a positive control with the same setup to prove the side effect is reachable. Observe the actual side effect, not a proxy that can remain unchanged. For parser, canonicalization, or sanitization tests, build fixtures from the producer's exact serialized shape. Include boundary cases such as optional whitespace, adjacent records, terminators without a newline, and malformed or unclosed input; assert that untrusted content is removed or fails closed while independent following content is preserved. A test-only normalized fixture can pass while the real wire framing still fails. ### Cross-layer contracts When adding or renaming a field that crosses backend, WebSocket, and frontend boundaries, use `rg` to trace every producer, DTO, store upsert or partial merge, reconnect/readiness handler, and consumer before editing. Add focused coverage at the affected boundaries, including refresh/reconnect and an update that omits the field, so a partial payload cannot silently d
Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 786d481
git clone https://github.com/kdlbs/kandev git -C kandev checkout 786d4817799e
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 786d4817799e only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- !CAUTION B 89 / 100
first audit · source
786d4817799e
Similar skills
All coding & review skills →kdlbs/kandev
Debug an ACP agent CLI by spawning it, speaking raw JSON-RPC, and capturing every frame to a JSONL file. Use when the user asks to probe an agent's capabilities, compare agents, test a prompt against an agent, inspect…
kdlbs/kandev
Add a new third-party integration (Jira/Linear-style) — per-workspace credentials, 90s auth-health poller, settings page, link/import buttons. Use when scaffolding a new external service integration.
kdlbs/kandev
Delete local branches whose remote has been deleted ([gone]), including their worktrees. Use for branch cleanup after merging PRs.
kdlbs/kandev
Review changed code for quality, security, and architecture compliance. Use only when the user explicitly requests local review or a PR finding requires it.
kdlbs/kandev
Stage and commit changes using Conventional Commits. Use when there are dirty/staged files to commit, the user says "commit", or before pushing a PR.
kdlbs/kandev
AI Kanban & Development Environment. Orchestrate multiple agents, review changes, open PRs. Multi-provider, self-hostable, no telemetry.
Questions about Tdd
What does the Tdd skill do?
Is Tdd safe to install?
What can Tdd access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/kdlbs/kandev/tree/main/.agents/skills/tdd — the audited source at commit 786d4817799e and every finding aboveObserved · 18 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Tdd skill do?
- Is Tdd safe to install?
- What can Tdd access on my machine?