Agent skill · Audited from source

Spec

skill · kdlbs/kandevAGPL-3.0 licenceAudited 18 Oct 2026 · source 786d4817799e

★ 972pushed today
!CAUTIONGrade B · 89/100 · 7 findings · 786d481
972repo stars · whole kdlbs/kandev

Is it safe? With care — CAUTION, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 786d4817799e and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. The audit raised 7 findings, 0 critical or high. What it does: Create or update Kandev product requirements and system-design documents before implementation. Use for new product behavior, changed contracts, or explicit specification work. Do not use for implementation plans, work…

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Spec (kdlbs/kandev)”. Retrieved 18 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/kdlbs/spec

2 skills are called “Spec”. You are viewing kdlbs/kandev.

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 18 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100!CAUTION B
0 critical0 high2 medium4 low1 info

CAUTION means the audit found things worth knowing before you trust this skill. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityWARN6
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codePASS1
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (7)

LOWFilesystem / pathfs.traversal · apps/web/e2e/tests/system/licenses-page.spec.ts:1
F-05 Filesystem / pathCWE-22 · CWE-59Layer L1
import { test, expect } from "../../fixtures/test-base";
Why
No further detail recorded for this rule.
Fix
—
INFOInventory / provenanceinv.oversize · apps/web/generated/licenses.json
F-13 Inventory / provenanceCWE-1104Layer L0
apps/web/generated/licenses.json
Why
1506638 bytes not read
Fix
—

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 786d4817799e · 18 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisherkdlbs GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderkdlbs/kandev/.agents/skills/specThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceAGPL-3.0As the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict786d4817799eA new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedPushed today
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Create or update Kandev product requirements and system-design documents before implementation. Use for new product behavior, changed contracts, or explicit specification work. Do not use for implementation plans, work…

---
name: spec
description: Create or update Kandev product requirements and system-design documents before implementation. Use for new product behavior, changed contracts, or explicit specification work. Do not use for implementation plans, work orders, incidents, or behavior-preserving refactors.
---

# Specification Authoring

Use this skill to create or update durable specifications. Requirements define
observable behavior. System designs define the technical path that satisfies
requirements.

The canonical rules are in `docs/specs/guide/`. Read these files before you
write an artifact:

- Always read `structure-and-ownership.md`.
- Read `requirements.md` for requirement work.
- Read `system-design.md` for system-design work.
- Read `traceability-and-lifecycle.md` for IDs, statuses, references, or
  migration work.

Use the templates in `docs/specs/templates/`.

## Artifact routing

Route the request before you write:

| Request | Artifact |
| --- | --- |
| Kandev-wide purpose, actors, principles, measures, or constraints | `docs/specs/product/` |
| Observable behavior for one owning system | `<system>/requirements/` |
| Technical contracts, models, boundaries, or control flow | `<system>/system-design/` |
| Durable choice with meaningful alternatives | `/record` and an ADR |
| Delivery sequence and implementation tasks | `/plan` |
| Incident or behavior-preserving refactor | No product requirement |
| Bug | `/fix`, which checks the existing requirement first |

Do not create a generic `spec.md` file.

When routing to `docs/specs/product/`, read `docs/specs/product/README.md`
before editing. Treat its **Product document index** as the local index: read
every linked product document and any co-located `INDEX.md`, `AGENTS.md`,
`CLAUDE.md`, or other instruction file when present. Product files provide
cross-system context, not feature requirements; preserve proposed and
open-question language instead of promoting it to an active contract without
confirmation.

## Workflow

### 1. Locate the owning system

Read `docs/specs/README.md` and the likely system `README.md`. If the system
has not migrated, run this command to locate the legacy source:

    python3 scripts/list-docs.py specs --kind legacy --format paths

Search the catalog, requirements, and designs for the capability name and its
main nouns:

    python3 scripts/list-docs.py specs --text <capability-term> --format paths

Update an existing capability when it owns the same actor, lifecycle, and
contract.

Choose the system that owns the source of truth and durable contract. Do not
choose an owner from the code directories that change. Record one sentence in
the working notes that states why the selected system owns the capability.

User visibility does not make a capability UI-owned. Keep provider state, task
state, permissions, persistence, and recovery with their owning systems. Put
desktop, mobile, accessibility, and visible failure outcomes in that owner's
requirement. Create a UI requirement only for an independent and reusable
presentation contract.

The same system owns the requirement and its design. Other systems link to that
source. They do not copy it or claim its requirement IDs in design frontmatter.

If no system owns the behavior, define the new system boundary before you write
requirements. A new system needs a `README.md` based on the system template.

### 2. Confirm intent

Run the `/interview-me` assumption check, reusing answers from earlier phases.
Resolve material choices before writing the affected contract. Preserve settled
terminology and decision rationale in the owning artifacts through that skill.
Do not hide an unresolved choice in a draft.

### 3. Write requirements

Create or update:

```text
docs/specs/<system>/requirements/<capability>.md
```

Each requirement document must contain:

- Valid frontmatter.
- One or more stable `REQ-*` IDs.
- At least one `AC-*` acceptance criterion for each requirement.
- Observable behavior and explicit exclusions.

Use user stories only when they clarify a natural actor and outcome. Do not put
files, functions, database queries, or implementation sequences in a
requirement.

Keep one cohesive vertical outcome together. Do not create separate backend and
UI requirements for the same feature. Split only when actors, lifecycles, or
contracts are independent.

### 4. Write system design

Create or update this file when the change needs a technical design:

```text
docs/specs/<system>/system-design/<capability>.md
```

The design must list the applicable `REQ-*` IDs in frontmatter. It can use an
explicit empty list for internal infrastructure with no independent product
requirement.

Describe stable components, models, contracts, flow, failure behavior,
persistence, security, and observability when they apply. Link to global ADRs.
Do not copy requirement or ADR text.

Cover all runtime boundaries that implement the owned outcome. A provider-owned
design can include backend services, storage, projections, frontend components,
responsive behavior, and tests. Do not create a parallel UI design for those
same requirements.

### 5. Update the system boundary

Update the system `README.md` only when the system boundary, migration record,
or related-system links change. State the system boundary and link adjacent
systems when ownership can be confused. Do not add a requirement or
system-design list.

Before and after adding required links, run `wc -c <system>/README.md`. Near
the 12 KiB `system-index` limit, keep every required link but use concise
labels or other non-semantic compression; never add a size exception. Rerun
the specification linter after the index update. Also search the README for
count or list summaries, update them when the authoritative pair count changes,
and verify that each stated count matches the indexed requirement/design pairs.

During migration, name the new source as authoritative. Replace the old source
with a link or archive it. Do not leave tw

Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 786d481

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/kdlbs/kandev
git -C kandev checkout 786d4817799e

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 786d4817799e only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. !CAUTION B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 786d4817799e

Questions about Spec

What does the Spec skill do?
AI Kanban & Development Environment. Orchestrate multiple agents, review changes, open PRs. Multi-provider, self-hostable, no telemetry.
Is Spec safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 7 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Spec access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (786d4817799e), read on 2026-10-18. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.