Metabase IngestSAFE
ktx is an executable context layer for data and analytics agents 🐙 Allow Claude Code, Codex, or other AI agents to query analytical databases accurately and with full context of your company
Overview
ktx is an executable context layer for data and analytics agents 🐙 Allow Claude Code, Codex, or other AI agents to query analytical databases accurately and with full context of your company
6283cdd9b55cOBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: metabase_ingest
description: Convert Metabase questions, models, and metrics into ktx Semantic Layer source definitions. Covers result-metadata to KSL column type mapping, FK/PK detection, near-duplicate deduplication, pre-aggregation decomposition, join-graph connectivity, and how to react to priorProvenance from earlier ingest syncs. Load when the WorkUnit contains `cards/<id>.json` files under a Metabase bundle.
callers: [memory_agent]
---
# Metabase to ktx Semantic Layer
Each WorkUnit represents one Metabase collection's cards for one Metabase database (mapped to exactly one ktx connection). Every `cards/<id>.json` file carries the resolved SQL, result_metadata, card type, collection path, and referenced-card ids. The WU's `sync-config.json` tells you which sync mode is active and which selections apply. `databases/<id>.json` tells you the target ktx connection.
## Context format
Each card JSON looks like:
```json
{
"metabaseId": 7,
"name": "Daily orders",
"description": "Orders by day",
"type": "model",
"databaseId": 42,
"collectionId": 5,
"resolvedSql": "SELECT ...",
"templateTags": [{"name": "ref", "type": "card", "cardReference": 10}],
"resultMetadata": [
{"name": "day", "base_type": "type/DateTime", "semantic_type": "type/CreationTimestamp"},
{"name": "order_count", "base_type": "type/Integer"}
],
"collectionPath": ["Data", "Orders Team"],
"referencedCardIds": [10]
}
```
Use `resultMetadata` to:
- Map `base_type` to KSL column type: `type/Integer`, `type/Float`, `type/Decimal`, `type/BigInteger` → `number`; `type/Text`, `type/TextLike` → `string`; `type/DateTime`, `type/Date`, `type/DateTimeWithTZ` → `time`; `type/Boolean` → `boolean`.
- Identify grain candidates: columns with `semantic_type: type/PK`.
- Identify join candidates: columns with `semantic_type: type/FK` plus `fk_target_field_id`.
- Identify time columns: `semantic_type: type/CreationTimestamp` or `type/UpdatedTimestamp` → set `role: time`.
- Use `display_name` for measure descriptions when available.
### Additional card metadata
- `parameters`: list of card-level parameters with widget types and defaults. When SQL resolution fell back to unresolved SQL, use this to drive Step A of the SQL-translation workflow (drop optional clauses): knowing each `{{ var }}` is `type: "date/range"` vs `type: "category"` tells you what kind of clause it is.
- `resultMetadata[i].field_ref`: Metabase's canonical reference to the source warehouse field. Shape `["field", <field_id>, <options>]`. When this is set, the column maps directly to a warehouse field, which is useful for declaring joins from FK metadata without re-parsing SQL.
- `lastRunAt`: ISO timestamp of the card's last execution. If null or very old, the card may be dead; prefer skipping over creating a source.
- `dashboardCount`: number of dashboards referencing the card. Cards with `dashboardCount: 0` and a stale `lastRunAt` are strong skip signals.
Before writing a wiki page derived from a Metabase question SQL, verify each
schema.table.column mentioned with entity_details.
## Identifier Verification Protocol
Before writing a wiki page or SL source on any topic:
1. `discover_data({query: "<topic>"})` - see what wikis, SL sources, and raw
tables already exist. Prefer updating existing pages over creating new ones.
Before emitting any `schema.table` or `schema.table.column` into a wiki body,
SL source, `tables:` frontmatter, `sl_refs`, or `emit_unmapped_fallback`:
2. `entity_details({connectionId, targets: [{display: "<identifier>"}]})` -
confirm the identifier resolves; inspect native types, FK/PK, and
sampleValues.
3. For literal values from the source, such as status codes or plan tiers,
check whether they appear in `entity_details` sampleValues for the relevant
column. If sampleValues is short or the sample may have missed real values,
run a `sql_execution` probe with the same warehouse connection id:
`sql_execution({connectionId, sql: "SELECT DISTINCT <col> FROM <ref> LIMIT 50"})`.
4. If the candidate identifier still does not resolve, do one of:
- Use `sql_execution({connectionId, sql: "SELECT 1 FROM <ref> LIMIT 0"})`.
If it errors, the identifier is fictional.
- Wrap the identifier in `[unverified - from <rawPath>]` in the wiki body,
citing the exact raw path that mentioned it.
- When recording `emit_unmapped_fallback` with `no_physical_table`, include
the failing probe error in `clarification`.
5. Never copy `<schema>.<table>` placeholder strings from these instructions
into output.
## Decision tree
For each card:
1. Analyze `resolvedSql` + `resultMetadata`: identify base tables, aggregations, joins, filters, column types.
2. **REQUIRED before any write**: call `sl_discover` for every candidate target source name. The response tells you whether the name is manifest-backed (`Type: table` or `Type: sql`). For manifest-backed names you MUST use the overlay shape (`name:` plus overlay fields such as `measures:`, `segments:`, `descriptions:`, `joins:`, `disable_joins:`, `column_overrides:`, and computed-only `columns:` entries with `expr` + `type`; no `sql:`, `table:`, `grain:`, or base-table `columns:`); the tool will reject a standalone write and you'll have wasted the call. If `sl_discover` returns nothing for the name, you can write a standalone source. Also call `sl_read_source` on existing sources you intend to extend so you don't duplicate measures.
3. Include `rawPaths: ["cards/<id>.json"]` on every `sl_write_source`, `sl_edit_source`, and `wiki_write` call. If one artifact generalizes multiple near-duplicate cards, include each contributing card path and no unrelated cards.
4. Decide:
- Simple aggregation on a table that already has a source → `sl_edit_source` to add a measure.
- Join between tables that should be linked in the SL graph → `sl_edit_source` to add a join.
- Complex derived SQL (CTEs, multi-layer aggregation, scoring models) → `sl_writTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (3)
CLAUDE.md
GEMINI.md
python/ktx-sl/CLAUDE.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6283cdd9b55cfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/kaelio__metabase_ingest.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 6283cdd9b55c | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Metabase Ingest skill do?
ktx is an executable context layer for data and analytics agents 🐙 Allow Claude Code, Codex, or other AI agents to query analytical databases accurately and with full context of your company
Is Metabase Ingest safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Metabase Ingest access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6283cdd9b55c), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.