Ux ExtractSAFE
Skills for Claude Code CLI such as full stack dev Cloudflare, React, Tailwind v4, and AI integrations.
Overview
Skills for Claude Code CLI such as full stack dev Cloudflare, React, Tailwind v4, and AI integrations.
be410003e718OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: ux-extract
description: "Exhaustively extract UX patterns from a reference web app. Walks every screen, captures screenshots of every state, records interaction patterns, copy verbatim, keyboard shortcuts, responsive treatments, motion, and empty/error/loading states. Produces a reusable pattern library that other audits can compare against. The inverse of ux-audit — asks 'what is the bar?' rather than 'does this match the bar?'. Trigger with 'learn from X', 'extract patterns from X', 'study X's UX', 'reverse engineer the UX of X', 'build a pattern library from X'."
compatibility: claude-code-only
---
# UX Extract
Exhaustively study a reference web app and produce a reusable pattern library. Goes everywhere, captures everything, then organises it into a document another audit or build can reference.
The inverse of `ux-audit`:
- **Audit** asks: *does this match a bar?*
- **Extract** asks: *what is the bar?*
Audits without extracts implicitly compare to "my memory of other apps" — fragile and inconsistent. Extracts turn that memory into a concrete, navigable artifact. An audit can then say: *"Empty state on /app/clients shows no CTA. Reference (claude.ai) shows 3 keyboard shortcuts plus 'New chat' in the same position"* instead of *"feels a bit sparse"*.
## When to use
- **Before building a new feature** — study how best-in-class apps handle it
- **Benchmarking a build** — extract the reference, then audit against it
- **Onboarding designers or engineers** — here's what good looks like, concretely
- **Competitor research** — document the competitor's UX so you can meaningfully differentiate
- **Refreshing an old app** — extract patterns from modern equivalents to guide the update
## Scope and ethics
Before starting, confirm the target is fair game:
1. **Use your own account** — don't scrape anything that requires credentials you don't legitimately hold
2. **Respect `robots.txt`** for unauthenticated crawling
3. **Rate-limit** — act like a human user, not a crawler. Pause between pages.
4. **Check ToS** — most SaaS Terms of Service permit individual inspection but prohibit automated scraping
5. **Don't redistribute** screenshots of a live competitor's app publicly — pattern libraries are internal references
If the target is behind a paywall or requires a trial account, ask the user whether they have legitimate access before proceeding.
## Setup
### 1. Browser tool
| Target | Tool | Notes |
|--------|------|-------|
| **Authenticated reference** (you have an account) | Chrome MCP | Uses your logged-in session |
| **Public reference** (marketing pages, docs, public demos) | Playwright MCP | No login needed |
See [../ux-audit/references/browser-tools.md](../ux-audit/references/browser-tools.md) for commands.
### 2. Viewport
Pin 1440×900 as baseline (MacBook standard). Also capture 768 and 375 for responsive patterns. Don't exceed 2000px wide.
### 2b. Screenshot post-processing
On Retina Macs, Chrome captures at 2× the logical viewport — a 1440-wide window produces a 2880-wide PNG. Post-process after each batch so the library isn't full of oversized files:
```bash
img-process batch ./screenshots --action optimise --max-width 1440
```
Idempotent — no-op on already-small files. Run at the end of each route's capture, or across the whole `screenshots/` folder at the end of the extract. Playwright MCP users can set `deviceScaleFactor: 1` in the context options and skip this step.
### 3. Scope
Decide before starting:
- **Whole app** — traverse everything reachable (can take hours, produces a comprehensive library)
- **Feature area** — one section ("the settings flow", "the dashboard", "the billing flow")
- **Pattern class** — just empty states, just error handling, just onboarding
Narrower scope produces tighter, more useful libraries. "Whole app" is only worth it for apps you'll be building a direct analogue of.
### 4. Focus lens (optional)
Optional bias for capture. Examples:
- *"Focus on patterns for data-heavy lists"* — prioritise table, filter, search, virtualisation screenshots
- *"Focus on onboarding and empty states"* — prioritise first-run flows and zero-data views
- *"Focus on permission boundaries"* — log in as multiple roles, document the differences
If no focus is given, capture broadly.
## Discovery
### Sitemap crawl
Build the full route inventory:
1. **Public sitemap** — check `/sitemap.xml`, `/robots.txt` for discoverability
2. **Nav crawl** — click through every section visible in the top nav, sidebar, footer
3. **In-app discovery** — once inside, note every link that appears (breadcrumbs, tabs, contextual menus)
4. **URL inspection** — some apps have useful patterns in `/settings`, `/preferences`, `/admin` that aren't in the main nav
Record each route with its purpose: `/settings/billing — subscription plan, payment method, invoice history`.
### Pattern inventory
Before deep-capture, scan the app once and list pattern types you'll document. Typical categories:
- Wayfinding (nav, breadcrumbs, current-location, back)
- Lists & tables (row, hover, action reveal, selection, sort, filter, paginate, empty)
- Forms (label, validation, error, required, inline help)
- Modals & dialogs (trigger, focus, escape, scroll, confirm)
- Feedback (toast, inline, progress, loading, saved)
- Onboarding & empty states (first-run, zero-data CTA, guided tour)
- Permissions & roles (restricted views, denied-access, role indicators)
- Copy & microcopy (buttons, headings, errors, placeholders, tooltips)
- Keyboard (shortcut sheet, focus, tab order, command palette)
- Motion (transition, reveal, loading, gesture)
- Responsive (breakpoints, mobile-specific: bottom sheet, tabs, swipe)
Not every app uses every category. Mark which apply.
## Capture Phase
For each route, capture exhaustively. Screenshots are cheap — err toward more.
### Screenshot all states
Per meaningful element, capture:
| State | Trigger |
|-------|---------|
| Default | page loaded, nothing Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
be410003e718full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jezweb__ux-extract.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | be410003e718 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Ux Extract skill do?
Skills for Claude Code CLI such as full stack dev Cloudflare, React, Tailwind v4, and AI integrations.
Is Ux Extract safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Ux Extract access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be410003e718), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.