Atlas / Skills / jezweb / Us Business English

Us Business EnglishSAFE

skills/jezweb/us-business-english

Skills for Claude Code CLI such as full stack dev Cloudflare, React, Tailwind v4, and AI integrations.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
MIT
Stars
1,059
01

Overview

Skills for Claude Code CLI such as full stack dev Cloudflare, React, Tailwind v4, and AI integrations.

Read from source at commit be410003e718OBSERVED · 2026-10-12
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: us-business-english
description: "American business English writing style for professional communications — direct, action-oriented, EN-US spelling (color, organize, center). Use whenever the user is writing for an American audience: emails, chat messages, proposals, client communications, blog posts, web copy, or any business writing. Apply to drafting, editing, and tone-checking professional text."
---

# US Business English

Professional and direct. Confident without being pushy. Friendly without being sloppy. Write like a competent American professional who gets things done -- not like a Silicon Valley bro, not like a Wall Street memo, and not like a corporate buzzword machine.

## Spelling (EN-US)

| Pattern | American | Not |
|---------|----------|-----|
| -or | color, favor, honor, behavior | colour, favour |
| -ize | organize, realize, specialize, recognize | organise, realise |
| -er | center, fiber, meter, theater | centre, fibre |
| -ense | license (noun and verb), defense, offense | licence (noun), defence |
| Single L | traveling, canceling, modeling | travelling, cancelling |
| -og | catalog, dialog, analog | catalogue, dialogue |
| -ment | judgment, acknowledgment | judgement, acknowledgement |

**Noun/verb note:** Unlike British/Australian English, American English uses "license" and "practice" for both noun and verb forms. No split needed.

**Common traps:** inquiry (standard, not enquiry), curb (road edge), tire (wheel), program (all contexts), check (not cheque), gray (not grey).

**Date format:** Month Day, Year -- January 15, 2026. Use this in all written communications unless matching a specific system format.

## Tone Ladder

Match formality to context. Default to "professional friendly" -- clear and personable.

| Context | Formality | Greeting | Sign-off |
|---------|-----------|----------|----------|
| Slack/Teams (internal) | Casual | "Hey" / first name | None needed |
| Email to existing client | Professional friendly | "Hi [Name]" | "Best" / "Thanks" |
| Email to new client | Professional | "Hi [Name]" | "Best" / "Thanks" |
| Proposal or quote | Professional | "Hi [Name]" | "Best regards" / "Best" |
| Follow-up after meeting | Professional friendly | "Hi [Name]" | "Thanks" / "Talk soon" |
| Cold outreach | Warm professional | "Hi [Name]" | "Best" / "Thanks" |
| Formal letter or legal | Formal | "Dear [Name]" | "Sincerely" |

**Never use:** "Dear Sir/Madam" (unless truly unknown recipient in legal context), "Warmest regards", "Respectfully yours" (reserve for military/government), "Cheers" (reads as affected British).

## Sign-off Ranking

From most to least common in US SME context:

1. **Best** -- default, works almost everywhere
2. **Thanks** -- when you're asking for something or appreciating effort
3. **Best regards** -- one step more formal, good for proposals
4. **Regards** -- neutral, slightly cooler
5. **Talk soon** -- casual, signals ongoing relationship

**Avoid:** "Cheers" (sounds British/Australian to American ears), "Kind regards" (slightly stiff), "Warm regards" (overdone), "Respectfully" (government/military tone).

## Avoid List

### Corporate Buzzwords

Replace these reflexively:

| Instead of | Write |
|-----------|-------|
| "synergy" / "synergize" | "working together" / "combined effort" |
| "leverage" (verb) | "use" / "take advantage of" |
| "circle back" | "follow up" / "come back to this" |
| "touch base" | "check in" / "connect" |
| "loop in" | "include" / "bring in" |
| "bandwidth" (for time) | "time" / "capacity" |
| "actionable insights" | "useful information" / "what we found" |
| "move the needle" | "make a difference" / "improve" |
| "deep dive" | "closer look" / "detailed review" |
| "pivot" | "change direction" / "adjust" |
| "align on" | "agree on" / "get on the same page" |
| "unpack" (an idea) | "look at" / "go through" |
| "cadence" | "schedule" / "frequency" |
| "deliverables" | "what we'll provide" / "the work" |

### Foreign-isms and Overcorrections

Avoid in written professional comms:

- **"Whilst", "amongst"** -- use "while", "among"
- **"Shall"** -- use "will" or "should"
- **"Keen"** -- use "interested" or "excited about"
- **"Brilliant" / "lovely"** -- sounds British, use "great" / "sounds good"
- **"Dude", "awesome", "totally"** in formal emails -- fine on Slack, not in proposals
- **Forced casualness** -- "Hey buddy!" to a new client is too much

## Writing Principles

1. **Lead with the point.** First sentence answers the question or states the purpose. Context comes after, not before.

2. **Short paragraphs.** Two to three sentences max. One idea per paragraph. White space is your friend.

3. **Natural contractions.** "We've", "I'll", "that's", "won't" -- reads human. Ease off slightly in proposals, but emails should sound like a person wrote them.

4. **Active voice.** "We'll send the report Monday" not "The report will be sent on Monday."

5. **Specific over vague.** "I'll have this to you by Thursday" not "I'll get back to you soon."

6. **One ask per email.** Multiple requests? Number them. Don't bury the second ask in paragraph four.

7. **Match their energy.** Short email from client? Short reply. Detailed brief? Detailed response. Don't write five paragraphs when two lines will do.

## Examples

### Status update to existing client

**Too corporate:**
> Dear Mr. Thompson, I am writing to provide you with a comprehensive update regarding the current status of your website redesign project. Please find below a summary of the deliverables completed to date and the anticipated timeline for remaining action items moving forward.

**Right tone:**
> Hi David,
>
> Quick update on the website -- we've finished the homepage and the three main service pages. Everything's looking solid.
>
> Next up is the contact form and booking system, which we'll have ready by end of next week. I'll send over a preview link once it's live on the staging site.
>
> Best,
> [Your name]

### Delivering a quote

**Too stiff:
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-12 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha be410003e718full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jezweb__us-business-english.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-12be410003e718SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Us Business English skill do?

Skills for Claude Code CLI such as full stack dev Cloudflare, React, Tailwind v4, and AI integrations.

Is Us Business English safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Us Business English access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be410003e718), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement