Atlas / Skills / jeremylongshore / Validator Expert

Validator ExpertSAFE

skills/jeremylongshore/validator-expert

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
2.22.0
Hosts
1 documented
License
MIT
Stars
2,831
01

Overview

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Read from source at commit bbcc1b9f30e4OBSERVED · 2026-10-12
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
claude-codementioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: validator-expert
description: 'Validate production readiness of Vertex AI Agent Engine deployments
  across

  security, monitoring, performance, compliance, and best practices. Generates

  weighted scores (0-100%) with actionable remediation plans. Use when asked to

  validate a deployment, run a production readiness check, audit security posture,

  or verify compliance for Vertex AI agents. Trigger with "validate deployment",

  "production readiness", "security audit", "compliance check", "is this agent

  ready for prod", "check my ADK agent", "review before deploy", or

  "production readiness check". Make sure to use this skill whenever validating

  ADK agents for Agent Engine.

  '
allowed-tools: Read,Grep,Glob,Bash(gcloud:*),Bash(python:*),Bash(pylint:*),Bash(flake8:*),Bash(mypy:*),Bash(bandit:*),Bash(pytest:*)
version: 2.22.0
author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]>
license: MIT
tags:
- vertex-ai
- security
- compliance
- validation
- production-readiness
- gcp
model: inherit
effort: high
argument-hint: '[project-id]'
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
---
# Validator Expert

## Current State

!`gcloud config get-value project 2>/dev/null || echo 'no active project'`
!`gcloud auth list --filter=status:ACTIVE --format="value(account)" 2>/dev/null || echo 'not authenticated'`

## Overview

Validate production readiness of Vertex AI Agent Engine deployments by executing weighted checks across five categories: security (30 points), monitoring (20 points), performance (25 points), compliance (15 points), and best practices (10 points). This skill produces a 0-100% composite score with pass/fail per check and prioritized remediation recommendations.

## Prerequisites

- `gcloud` CLI authenticated with `roles/aiplatform.viewer`, `roles/iam.securityReviewer`, and `roles/monitoring.viewer`
- Access to the target Google Cloud project and Vertex AI Agent Engine deployment
- Cloud Monitoring API and Cloud Logging API enabled in the project
- Knowledge of the deployment's expected SLOs (latency targets, error rate thresholds)
- Read-only access to IAM policies, VPC-SC configurations, and service account bindings

## Instructions

1. Retrieve the deployment configuration using the Python SDK (`vertexai.Client().agent_engines.get(name)`) or REST API (`GET https://{LOCATION}-aiplatform.googleapis.com/v1/projects/{PROJECT}/locations/{LOCATION}/reasoningEngines/{ID}`) and parse model, scaling, and feature settings
2. Run the security validation suite (see [security checklist](references/security-checklist.md)):
   - Check if Agent Identity is enabled (recommended over service accounts for 2025+ deployments)
   - If using service accounts, verify IAM roles follow least-privilege (`roles/aiplatform.expressUser`, not `roles/aiplatform.admin`)
   - Confirm VPC Service Controls perimeter is active and correctly scoped
   - Check encryption at rest (CMEK or Google-managed) and in-transit (TLS 1.3)
   - Scan configuration files and environment variables for hardcoded secrets
   - Validate Model Armor is enabled with `roles/modelarmor.user` granted
   - Check Memory Bank IAM Conditions for multi-tenant agents
3. Run the monitoring validation suite:
   - Verify Cloud Monitoring dashboards exist with required panels (request count, error rate, latency)
   - Confirm alerting policies cover error rate spikes, latency SLO breaches, and cost thresholds
   - Check token usage tracking is enabled with per-model granularity
   - Validate structured logging with severity levels and correlation IDs
   - Confirm latency SLOs are defined with p95 and p99 targets
4. Run the performance validation suite:
   - Verify auto-scaling is configured with appropriate min/max instance counts
   - Check resource limits (CPU, memory) match expected workload profile
   - Confirm caching strategy is implemented for repeated prompts or embeddings
   - Validate Code Execution Sandbox TTL is set between 7-14 days
   - Check Memory Bank retention policy (min 100 memories, auto-cleanup enabled)
5. Run the compliance validation suite:
   - Confirm audit logging is enabled for all admin and data access operations
   - Verify data residency meets regional requirements
   - Check privacy policies and data retention schedules
   - Validate backup and disaster recovery configuration
6. Calculate weighted scores per category and compute the overall production readiness percentage
7. Generate a prioritized recommendation list sorted by score impact per remediation effort

## Output

- Production readiness score: 0-100% with status (READY >= 85%, NEEDS WORK 70-84%, NOT READY < 70%)
- Per-category breakdown: security (x/30), monitoring (x/20), performance (x/25), compliance (x/15), best practices (x/10)
- Pass/fail table for each individual check with evidence notes
- Prioritized remediation plan: action items ranked by score improvement per effort
- Comparison to previous validation run (if available) showing score delta

## Error Handling

| Error | Cause | Solution |
|-------|-------|----------|
| Insufficient IAM permissions | Viewer roles not granted on target project | Request `roles/aiplatform.viewer` and `roles/iam.securityReviewer` from project admin |
| Agent deployment not found | Incorrect agent ID or deployment deleted | Verify agent ID with `vertexai.Client().agent_engines.list()` or REST `GET .../reasoningEngines`; confirm deployment region |
| Monitoring API returns no data | API not enabled or agent has zero traffic | Enable Monitoring API; generate synthetic traffic to populate baseline metrics |
| VPC-SC configuration inaccessible | Organization policy restricts VPC-SC reads | Request `roles/accesscontextmanager.policyReader` at organization level |
| Compliance check inconclusive | Audit logs not enabled or retention too short | Enable Data Access audit logs; set log retention to minimum 365 days |

## Examples

**Scenario 1: Pre-Launch Validation** -- Validate a new ADK agent before production l
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (1)

INFOPrompt injection · prompt.authority_framing · CWE-94, CWE-1427
references/security-checklist.md:178
| `roles/discoveryengine.admin` | Full access |

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-12 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha bbcc1b9f30e4full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__validator-expert.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-12bbcc1b9f30e4SAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Validator Expert skill do?

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Is Validator Expert safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Validator Expert access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does Validator Expert work with?

Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (bbcc1b9f30e4), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement