Atlas / Skills / jeremylongshore / Planning Disaster Recovery

Planning Disaster RecoverySAFE

skills/jeremylongshore/planning-disaster-recovery

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.25.0
Hosts
1 documented
License
MIT
Stars
2,823
01

Overview

From the repository's own README, as read at the audited commit. Badges and raw HTML are left out.

Bundled resources for disaster-recovery-planner skill

Read from source at commit 4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
claude-codementioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: planning-disaster-recovery
description: 'Execute use when you need to work with backup and recovery.

  This skill provides backup automation and disaster recovery with comprehensive guidance
  and automation.

  Trigger with phrases like "create backups", "automate backups",

  or "implement disaster recovery".

  '
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash(tar:*), Bash(rsync:*), Bash(aws:s3:*)
version: 1.25.0
author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]>
license: MIT
tags:
- devops
- backup
- disaster-recovery
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
---
# Planning Disaster Recovery

## Overview

Design disaster recovery (DR) plans for cloud infrastructure covering RTO/RPO requirements, multi-region failover, data replication, and automated recovery procedures. Generate runbooks, Terraform for standby infrastructure, and automated failover scripts for databases, compute, and networking.

## Prerequisites

- Complete inventory of production infrastructure components and dependencies
- Defined RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) per service tier
- Cloud provider CLI authenticated with permissions for multi-region resource management
- Cross-region networking configured (VPC peering, Transit Gateway, or VPN)
- Backup and replication mechanisms already in place or planned

## Instructions

1. Catalog all production services with their criticality tier (Tier 1: < 15 min RTO, Tier 2: < 1 hour, Tier 3: < 24 hours)
2. Map dependencies between services to identify single points of failure and cascading failure paths
3. Design the DR strategy per tier: active-active for Tier 1, pilot light or warm standby for Tier 2, backup-restore for Tier 3
4. Generate Terraform for standby region infrastructure: VPC, subnets, security groups, and scaled-down compute
5. Configure database replication: RDS cross-region read replicas, DynamoDB global tables, or Cloud SQL cross-region replicas
6. Set up DNS failover using Route 53 health checks, Cloud DNS routing policies, or global load balancers
7. Create automated failover scripts: promote read replica to primary, update DNS records, scale up standby compute
8. Document the DR runbook with step-by-step procedures, responsible parties, and communication plans
9. Schedule quarterly DR drills: simulate region failure, execute the runbook, measure actual RTO/RPO, and document gaps
10. Set up monitoring for replication lag, backup freshness, and standby infrastructure health

## Output

- DR plan document with service tiers, RTO/RPO targets, and recovery procedures
- Terraform modules for standby region infrastructure
- Automated failover scripts (database promotion, DNS switching, compute scaling)
- DR drill checklist and post-drill assessment template
- Monitoring dashboards for replication lag and backup status

## Error Handling

| Error | Cause | Solution |
|-------|-------|---------|
| `Replication lag exceeds RPO` | Network throughput insufficient or write volume too high | Increase replication instance size, enable compression, or implement write throttling during peak |
| `DNS failover not triggering` | Health check misconfigured or TTL too high | Verify health check endpoint returns proper status; reduce DNS TTL to 60 seconds before drill |
| `Standby database promotion failed` | Replication broken or standby in inconsistent state | Check replication status; if broken, restore from latest snapshot and re-establish replication |
| `Insufficient capacity in DR region` | Instance types unavailable in standby region | Pre-provision reserved capacity in DR region or use multiple instance type options |
| `Application cannot connect after failover` | Connection strings hardcoded to primary region endpoints | Use DNS-based endpoints (CNAME/Route 53) instead of direct IPs; parameterize region in config |

## Examples

- "Create a disaster recovery plan for a 3-tier web application on AWS with < 15 minute RTO for the API layer and < 1 hour for batch processing."
- "Generate Terraform for a warm standby in us-west-2 with RDS cross-region read replica, scaled-down ECS cluster, and Route 53 failover routing."
- "Design a DR drill that simulates primary region failure, executes automated failover, and validates data integrity in the standby region."

## Resources

- AWS Disaster Recovery: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/disaster-recovery-workloads-on-aws/
- GCP DR planning: https://cloud.google.com/architecture/dr-scenarios-planning-guide
- Azure Business Continuity: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/reliability/
- DR strategy patterns:
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-08 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__planning-disaster-recovery.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-084f83675ca38aSAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Planning Disaster Recovery skill do?

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Is Planning Disaster Recovery safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Planning Disaster Recovery access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does Planning Disaster Recovery work with?

Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement