Atlas / Skills / jeremylongshore / Mistral Security Basics

Mistral Security BasicsSAFE

skills/jeremylongshore/mistral-security-basics

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.14.0
Hosts
1 documented
License
MIT
Stars
2,824
01

Overview

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Read from source at commit 4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
claude-codementioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: mistral-security-basics
description: >-
  Threat-model Mistral credentials, untrusted content, model output, tools, files, and tenant access. Use when securing or reviewing an integration. Trigger with "secure Mistral", "audit Mistral prompts", or "threat model a Mistral app".
allowed-tools: Read,Glob,Grep,Write,Edit
argument-hint: "<system-boundary> <data-class> <tool-surface>"
version: 1.14.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]>
tags: [saas, mistral, security]
model: inherit
effort: high
compatibility: "Designed for Claude Code; live or external Mistral actions require network access and explicit approval"
---
# Mistral Security Boundary

## Overview

Apply controls at the application boundary because model instructions do not enforce identity, tenancy, authorization, or side-effect safety. Treat user content, retrieval, files, and output as untrusted.

## Prerequisites

- A data-flow diagram covering browser, app, Mistral, stores, and tools.
- Credential, retention, tenant, moderation, and incident policies.
- An inventory of stateful APIs, files, retrieval stores, and actions.

## Current Contract

Bearer credentials authorize provider calls but not application users. Classifiers can support policy but do not replace controls. ZDR eligibility differs between stateless and stateful products.

## Authentication

Keep keys server-side and environment-scoped; rotate on exposure. Enforce user and tenant authorization before retrieval, provider calls, files, and tools.

## Instructions

1. Map trust boundaries and classify prompts, outputs, embeddings, files, logs, and IDs.
2. Remove credentials and privileged instructions from browser/untrusted contexts.
3. Separate trusted policy from untrusted content and delimit retrieved text as data.
4. Validate output structure and safety before render, storage, or tool use.
5. Authorize tools via closed registry, schemas, least privilege, deadlines, and idempotency.
6. Test injection, cross-tenant access, unsafe output, exfiltration, duplicates, and rotation.

## Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect code, locks, configuration, tests, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository changes. Invocation alone does not authorize network calls, paid usage, uploads, stateful resources, admin mutations, deployments, or deletion.

## Approval Boundaries

Require approval for sensitive data, uploads, stateful APIs, tools, policy changes, retention, or live attack testing. Model output never grants authority.

## Error Handling

- Prompt wording cannot enforce access control.
- Moderation success does not prove correctness or tool safety.
- Assuming ZDR for Files, Batch, Agents, Conversations, or other stateful products is unsafe.

## Output

Return assets, threats, controls, residual risks, data/API boundary, tests, owners, and rollback. Exclude live secrets and customer data.

## Examples

- Reject retrieved text asking for a system secret.
- Require fresh app authorization before a proposed refund tool.

## Validation

Run synthetic abuse cases across input, retrieval, output, rendering, and tools; confirm tenant filters and rotation independently.

## Resources

- [Current first-party evidence map](references/official-docs.md) — recheck dated sources before relying on mutable endpoints, models, limits, prices, preview status, or retention.
- Record live account observations as environment-specific evidence, not universal Mistral guarantees.
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-09 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__mistral-security-basics.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-094f83675ca38aSAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Mistral Security Basics skill do?

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Is Mistral Security Basics safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Mistral Security Basics access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does Mistral Security Basics work with?

Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement