Mistral ObservabilitySAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: mistral-observability description: >- Instrument Mistral requests, streams, tools, batch, and workflows without logging sensitive content. Use when building dashboards or SLOs. Trigger with "monitor Mistral", "trace Mistral latency", or "add Mistral alerts". allowed-tools: Read,Glob,Grep,Write,Edit argument-hint: "<service> <slo> <telemetry-backend>" version: 1.14.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: [saas, mistral, observability] model: inherit effort: high compatibility: "Designed for Claude Code; live or external Mistral actions require network access and explicit approval" --- # Mistral Content-Free Observability ## Overview Observe demand, reliability, latency, usage, and state convergence without credentials or content. Keep app telemetry authoritative; evaluate provider Public Preview observability separately. ## Prerequisites - Defined SLOs, error taxonomy, data classification, and telemetry retention. - A correlation design using opaque application identifiers. - Metrics for queue, transport, stream, usage, tools, batch, workflows, and spend. ## Current Contract Mistral documents Public Preview observability endpoints plus API/admin usage evidence. Preview adoption is optional and requires schema, retention, and availability evaluation. ## Authentication Never emit authorization, keys, prompts, responses, embeddings, files, tool data, or signed URLs. Restrict admin/preview observability access separately. ## Instructions 1. Define golden signals and state outcomes before fields. 2. Emit endpoint class, opaque model, status/error, attempts, latency segments, usage, and terminal state. 3. Propagate trace context without provider/customer content as identifiers. 4. Dashboard SLOs, throttling, unfinished streams, duplicates, backlog, and spend anomalies. 5. Alert on user impact and actionable budget/state thresholds with owners/runbooks. 6. Evaluate beta observability for data, retention, access, export, failure, and rollback. ## Tool Discipline Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect code, locks, configuration, tests, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository changes. Invocation alone does not authorize network calls, paid usage, uploads, stateful resources, admin mutations, deployments, or deletion. ## Approval Boundaries Provider observability, trace export, identifier retention, sampling changes, or content-bearing fields require approval. Application-owned content-free telemetry remains the safe default. ## Error Handling - Logging prompts turns telemetry into an uncontrolled content store. - `2xx` can hide invalid output or unfinished state. - High-cardinality customer text exposes data and destabilizes monitoring. ## Output Return SLOs, telemetry schema and exclusions, dashboards, alerts and owners, preview decision, retention, evidence, and rollback. Identify every signal that remains unavailable. ## Examples - Measure queue, first event, terminal latency, usage, and validation without response text. - Alert when workflow state stops converging despite a healthy stream. ## Validation Inspect telemetry for all paths, scan for secrets and content, and test alert and runbook routing. Confirm cardinality and retention remain within approved bounds. ## Resources - [Current first-party evidence map](references/official-docs.md) — recheck dated sources before relying on mutable endpoints, models, limits, prices, preview status, or retention. - Record live account observations as environment-specific evidence, not universal Mistral guarantees.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__mistral-observability.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Mistral Observability skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Mistral Observability safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Mistral Observability access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Mistral Observability work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.