Atlas / Skills / jeremylongshore / Mistral Deploy Integration

Mistral Deploy IntegrationSAFE

skills/jeremylongshore/mistral-deploy-integration

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.14.0
Hosts
1 documented
License
MIT
Stars
2,824
01

Overview

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Read from source at commit 4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
claude-codementioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: mistral-deploy-integration
description: >-
  Deploy a Mistral-backed service with secret isolation, bounded concurrency, health semantics, canary evidence, and rollback. Use when preparing runtime delivery. Trigger with "deploy a Mistral app", "configure Mistral production", or "canary a Mistral service".
allowed-tools: Read,Glob,Grep,Write,Edit
argument-hint: "<platform> <environment> <release-sha>"
version: 1.14.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]>
tags: [saas, mistral, deployment]
model: inherit
effort: high
compatibility: "Designed for Claude Code; live or external Mistral actions require network access and explicit approval"
---
# Mistral Deployment Integration

## Overview

Prepare a platform-neutral runtime boundary. Separate application health from provider readiness, keep credentials server-side, and make overload, provider failure, and rollback predictable.

## Prerequisites

- An immutable artifact, lockfile, release SHA, and deployment owner.
- An environment-scoped secret, egress policy, and tenant authorization design.
- Capacity, timeout, queue, spend, observability, canary, and rollback policies.

## Current Contract

The API is `https://api.mistral.ai` with Bearer auth. Model and workspace capacity are runtime dependencies; application startup should not require a paid inference call.

## Authentication

Inject the key into a trusted server and restrict egress. Never pass it to browser, build output, health response, or an edge runtime without protected secret semantics.

## Instructions

1. Map build, runtime, secret, egress, scaling, queue, and shutdown behavior.
2. Package the pinned adapter and validate config without contacting Mistral during build.
3. Set end-to-end deadlines, bounded concurrency, cancellation, and overload behavior.
4. Implement local liveness and a separate dependency/readiness signal without provider data.
5. Deploy to staging, run offline checks, then request approval for a synthetic canary.
6. Compare evidence, promote within a fixed traffic bound, and prove rollback plus queue reconciliation.

## Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect code, locks, configuration, tests, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository changes. Invocation alone does not authorize network calls, paid usage, uploads, stateful resources, admin mutations, deployments, or deletion.

## Approval Boundaries

Deployment, secret mutation, traffic shift, scaling, canary spend, and rollback execution each require explicit scope and approval.

## Error Handling

- Inference in liveness amplifies outage and spend.
- Autoscaling without a shared limiter exceeds workspace capacity.
- Rollback without queue/state reconciliation can duplicate work.

## Output

Return artifact/release identity, topology, secret/egress boundary, limits, health semantics, canary, traffic state, and rollback receipt.

## Examples

- Build once and inject production secrets only at runtime.
- Keep liveness green during provider degradation while product behavior fails safely.

## Validation

Inspect artifact for secrets and test denied egress, overload, shutdown, outage, canary abort, rollback, and queue convergence.

## Resources

- [Current first-party evidence map](references/official-docs.md) — recheck dated sources before relying on mutable endpoints, models, limits, prices, preview status, or retention.
- Record live account observations as environment-specific evidence, not universal Mistral guarantees.
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-09 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__mistral-deploy-integration.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-094f83675ca38aSAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Mistral Deploy Integration skill do?

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Is Mistral Deploy Integration safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Mistral Deploy Integration access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does Mistral Deploy Integration work with?

Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement