Atlas / Skills / jeremylongshore / Mistral Core Workflow B

Mistral Core Workflow BSAFE

skills/jeremylongshore/mistral-core-workflow-b

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.14.0
Hosts
1 documented
License
MIT
Stars
2,824
01

Overview

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Read from source at commit 4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
claude-codementioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: mistral-core-workflow-b
description: >-
  Build Mistral embeddings, retrieval, and function-calling loops with tenant isolation and application-owned execution. Use when adding RAG or tools. Trigger with "build Mistral RAG", "use Mistral embeddings", or "add Mistral function calling".
allowed-tools: Read,Glob,Grep,Write,Edit
argument-hint: "<retrieval-corpus> <tool-policy> <tenant-boundary>"
version: 1.14.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]>
tags: [saas, mistral, rag]
model: inherit
effort: high
compatibility: "Designed for Claude Code; live or external Mistral actions require network access and explicit approval"
---
# Mistral Retrieval and Tool Execution

## Overview

Keep retrieval and tool use under application control. The model may propose queries or typed arguments; trusted code owns authorization, execution, side effects, and returned evidence.

## Prerequisites

- A tenant-scoped corpus with chunking, deletion, and re-embedding policy.
- A current embedding model selected from account evidence.
- A closed tool registry with schemas, authorization, deadlines, and idempotency.

## Current Contract

Embeddings use `POST /v1/embeddings`; tool calls use the current chat schema. Vector shape, model access, tool schemas, and parallel behavior must come from the selected current contracts.

## Authentication

Use Bearer auth only for Mistral. Every retrieved record and proposed action must separately pass application user and tenant authorization.

## Instructions

1. Define retrieval purpose, data class, tenant filter, deletion SLA, and evaluation set.
2. Store embedding model, preprocessing version, and observed vector shape with each index.
3. Retrieve with mandatory tenant filters and cap context before chat assembly.
4. Validate each proposed tool name and argument against the closed registry and strict schema.
5. Authorize and execute each side effect in trusted code with deadline and idempotency.
6. Evaluate retrieval quality, access negatives, tool denial, usage, latency, and rollback.

## Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect code, locks, configuration, tests, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository changes. Invocation alone does not authorize network calls, paid usage, uploads, stateful resources, admin mutations, deployments, or deletion.

## Approval Boundaries

Require approval before embedding customer data, creating an index, executing a mutation, widening corpus access, or allowing parallel actions.

## Error Handling

- Mixed-model indexes can corrupt similarity meaning.
- Prompt instructions cannot replace tenant filters or authorization.
- Malformed or repeated tool calls must be rejected or deduplicated, never broadened.

## Output

Return corpus/tenant boundary, model/preprocessing versions, retrieval metrics, tool decisions, idempotency IDs, usage, retention, and rollback.

## Examples

- Retrieve only records authorized for one tenant and cite opaque IDs.
- Let the model propose `lookup_order`; trusted code validates schema and entitlement.

## Validation

Test cross-tenant denial, deletion propagation, model mismatch, empty retrieval, malformed/duplicate tools, cancellation, and mutation denial.

## Resources

- [Current first-party evidence map](references/official-docs.md) — recheck dated sources before relying on mutable endpoints, models, limits, prices, preview status, or retention.
- Record live account observations as environment-specific evidence, not universal Mistral guarantees.
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-09 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__mistral-core-workflow-b.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-094f83675ca38aSAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Mistral Core Workflow B skill do?

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Is Mistral Core Workflow B safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Mistral Core Workflow B access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does Mistral Core Workflow B work with?

Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement