Mistral Common ErrorsSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: mistral-common-errors description: >- Diagnose Mistral authentication, validation, throttling, model, transport, and provider failures without unsafe retries. Use when an integration fails. Trigger with "Mistral error", "fix a Mistral 429", or "debug a failed Mistral request". allowed-tools: Read,Glob,Grep,Write,Edit argument-hint: "<status-or-exception> <environment> <request-evidence>" version: 1.14.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: [saas, mistral, troubleshooting] model: inherit effort: high compatibility: "Designed for Claude Code; live or external Mistral actions require network access and explicit approval" --- # Mistral Error Triage ## Overview Classify failure before changing code or replaying work. Separate local configuration, invalid request, account policy, rate boundary, transient provider, and application parsing failures. ## Prerequisites - A timestamp, environment, operation, endpoint class, client pin, and sanitized error. - The application deadline, idempotency class, and retry budget. - Current endpoint and workspace-limit documentation. ## Current Contract HTTP and client errors are evidence, not universal retry instructions. Workspace limits are shared across keys and current dimensions belong to the Admin Panel. ## Authentication Never request or reproduce a key. Confirm only secret-reference resolution, expected host, and environment. ## Instructions 1. Freeze automatic retries and identify ambiguous side effects or state. 2. Normalize status, request ID, endpoint, model, client, attempts, and elapsed time. 3. Validate the request locally against the current endpoint contract. 4. Check account, model access, current usage limits, and billing with authorized evidence. 5. Classify and choose bounded mitigation: fix config/input, wait, reduce demand, or escalate. 6. Reproduce once with synthetic data only when approved; revert temporary diagnostics. ## Tool Discipline Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect code, locks, configuration, tests, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository changes. Invocation alone does not authorize network calls, paid usage, uploads, stateful resources, admin mutations, deployments, or deletion. ## Approval Boundaries Require approval for replay, limit/spend increase, model substitution, upgrade, or support submission. Never blindly retry stateful work. ## Error Handling - Repeated `401` calls will not repair a revoked key. - Aggressive retries after `429` amplify queued demand. - A timeout after submission may be ambiguous; reconcile before repeating. ## Output Return classification, sanitized evidence, likely cause and confidence, ruled-out causes, replay risk, mitigation, owner, and checkpoint. Name the next safe diagnostic if evidence is still inconclusive. ## Examples - Classify `429` from current workspace evidence and deadline. - Treat timed-out batch creation as ambiguous until state is reconciled. ## Validation Prove the fix follows from evidence, preserves idempotency, fits deadline/budget, and exposes no content or credentials. ## Resources - [Current first-party evidence map](references/official-docs.md) — recheck dated sources before relying on mutable endpoints, models, limits, prices, preview status, or retention. - Record live account observations as environment-specific evidence, not universal Mistral guarantees.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__mistral-common-errors.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Mistral Common Errors skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Mistral Common Errors safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Mistral Common Errors access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Mistral Common Errors work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.