Linear Webhooks EventsBLOCK
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned | |
| cursor | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: linear-webhooks-events description: >- Implement Linear webhook verification, fast acknowledgement, deduplication, queued processing, and reconciliation. Use when receiving issue, project, cycle, customer, user, or OAuth-app events. Trigger with "handle Linear webhooks", "verify Linear signature", or "process Linear events". argument-hint: "[repository-path] [framework] [event-types]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.13.0 author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> license: MIT tags: - saas - linear - webhooks model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live verification requires network access and an approved Linear workspace credential --- # Linear Verified Webhook Processing ## Overview Build an ingress path that proves authenticity on raw bytes, acknowledges quickly, and makes downstream processing replay-safe. ## Prerequisites - The target repository, Linear workspace, environment, and accountable owner - Current security, privacy, compliance, capacity, and change-control requirements - An approved Linear credential only when a bounded live verification is necessary ## Tool Discipline Use `Read`, `Glob`, and `Grep` to inspect code, configuration, and evidence. Use `WebFetch` only for current first-party Linear documentation and package metadata. Use `Write` or `Edit` only for requested implementation with known target files. Never write credentials, customer content, unrestricted environment output, or unredacted GraphQL variables. ## Current Contract - The endpoint must be public HTTPS and return HTTP 200 within five seconds; failures retry after one minute, one hour, and six hours, up to three retries. - `Linear-Signature` is the hex HMAC-SHA256 of the exact raw body; `Linear-Delivery` is the unique delivery UUID and `Linear-Timestamp` is epoch milliseconds. - Only workspace admins or OAuth applications with `admin` scope can create or read webhooks. - The official SDK provides `LinearWebhookClient`, including raw-body signature verification and framework handlers. ## Authentication Use a personal API key only for owner-controlled scripts, OAuth with PKCE for user-delegated applications, or an enabled client-credentials grant for approved automation. Personal keys use `Authorization: <API_KEY>`; OAuth tokens use `Authorization: Bearer <ACCESS_TOKEN>`. Store credentials server-side in an approved secret manager. Treat app approval, team access, scope changes, credential creation, rotation, revocation, and production access as owner-approved actions. ## Instructions 1. Select explicit resource types and team/all-public-team scope, and identify the webhook/admin owner. 2. Capture the exact raw request bytes before JSON middleware and verify HMAC-SHA256 with the configured signing secret. 3. Reject invalid or stale/replayed requests, deduplicate by `Linear-Delivery`, enqueue the verified envelope, and return 200 within five seconds. 4. Process events idempotently using `action`, `type`, entity ID, `updatedFrom`, organization, and webhook ID as appropriate. 5. Bound retries and dead-letter handling; never assume Linear will retry beyond the documented schedule. 6. Run periodic cursor-based reconciliation and test create/update/remove, duplicate, delayed, revoked-app, and secret-rotation cases. ## Approval Boundaries Do not create, reveal, rotate, or revoke credentials; authorize an OAuth app; change scopes or team access; create, mutate, archive, or delete workspace data; configure or re-enable webhooks; import or export data; change roles, SCIM, or audit streaming; transmit diagnostics; change paid entitlements; or perform another production mutation without explicit approval from the accountable owner. Keep diagnosis read-only unless implementation was requested. ## Output Return the workspace and team scope, auth mode without credential value, files and contracts inspected, exact operation names, evidence collected, validation result, sensitive fields redacted, remaining risk, accountable owner, approval state, and rollback or next action. ## Error Handling | Condition | Response | |---|---| | Signature mismatch | Return non-200, do not parse into business logic, and verify raw-body/secret selection. | | Processing exceeds five seconds | Queue after verification and acknowledge before doing business work. | | Duplicate delivery | Return 200 after recording the dedupe hit; do not repeat side effects. | | Webhook disabled | Repair the endpoint, manually re-enable after approval, then reconcile the missed interval. | ## Examples Use a compact handoff that makes scope, mutation authority, and verification evidence reviewable. Input: ```text scope=team; events=Issue,Comment; raw-body=true; queue=durable ``` Expected handoff: ```text signature=verified; ack<5s; dedupe=delivery-id; reconciliation=enabled ``` ## Resources - [Skill-specific official documentation](references/official-docs.md) - [Linear developer documentation index](https://linear.app/llms.txt) - [Linear GraphQL API](https://linear.app/developers/graphql.md)
Trust audit
BLOCKgrade D · trust 69/100 Do not install this without reading the findings. The audit found something that could harm you or your machine.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | FAIL |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (2)
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live verification requires network access and an approved Linear workspace credential
Treat app approval, team access, scope changes, credential creation, rotation, revocation, and production access as owner-approved actions.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__linear-webhooks-events.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | 4f83675ca38a | BLOCK | D | 69 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Linear Webhooks Events skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Linear Webhooks Events safe to install?
No — not without reading the findings first. The audit graded it D (69/100) and found 2 critical or high issues in the source. Each one is listed on this page with the file and line it is on.
What can Linear Webhooks Events access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Linear Webhooks Events work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code and cursor. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.