Atlas / Skills / jeremylongshore / Lindy Cost Tuning

Lindy Cost TuningSAFE

skills/jeremylongshore/lindy-cost-tuning

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.20.0
Hosts
1 documented
License
MIT
Stars
2,824
01

Overview

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Read from source at commit 4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
claude-codementioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: lindy-cost-tuning
description: 'Optimize Lindy AI costs through credit management, model selection,

  and agent consolidation.

  Use when reducing spend, analyzing credit usage patterns,

  or optimizing budget allocation across agents.

  Trigger with phrases like "lindy cost", "lindy billing",

  "reduce lindy spend", "lindy budget", "lindy credits".

  '
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit
version: 1.20.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]>
tags:
- saas
- lindy
- cost-optimization
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
---
# Lindy Cost Tuning

## Overview

Lindy uses a credit-based pricing model. Every task costs credits based on model
size, step count, premium actions, and duration. Cost tuning targets: model
right-sizing, agent consolidation, trigger optimization, and credit monitoring.

## Prerequisites

- Lindy workspace with billing access
- Multiple active agents to evaluate
- Dashboard access to review per-agent task history

## Credit Cost Reference

| Factor | Credits |
|--------|---------|
| Basic model task (Gemini Flash) | 1-2 |
| Mid-tier model (GPT-4o-mini, Claude Haiku) | 2-5 |
| Large model task (GPT-4, Claude Sonnet) | 5-10 |
| Premium model (Claude Opus) | ~10+ |
| Phone call (US/Canada) | ~20/minute |
| Phone call (international) | 21-53/minute |
| Premium actions (webhooks) | Additional per action |
| Minimum per task | 1 credit |

## Plan Costs

| Plan | Monthly | Credits | Per Extra Seat |
|------|---------|---------|----------------|
| Free | $0 | 400 | N/A |
| Pro | $49.99 | 5,000 | $19.99 |
| Business | $299.99 | 30,000 | Included |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom |

## Instructions

### Step 1: Audit Agent Credit Consumption

For each active agent, collect:

1. **Task count** (last 30 days) — from Tasks tab
2. **Average credits per task** — total credits / task count
3. **Model used** — from agent settings
4. **Trigger frequency** — how often the agent fires

Create a cost audit table:

| Agent | Tasks/Month | Credits/Task | Model | Monthly Credits | % of Total |
|-------|------------|-------------|-------|----------------|-----------|
| Support Bot | 500 | 5 | Claude Sonnet | 2,500 | 50% |
| Lead Router | 200 | 2 | GPT-4o-mini | 400 | 8% |
| Report Gen | 30 | 10 | GPT-4 | 300 | 6% |

### Step 2: Right-Size Models

The highest-impact optimization. For each agent, ask:
> "Does this task actually need GPT-4/Claude, or would Gemini Flash work?"

| Current Setup | Optimized | Savings |
|--------------|-----------|---------|
| Email classify with Claude Sonnet (5 cr) | Gemini Flash (1 cr) | 80% |
| Data extract with GPT-4 (10 cr) | GPT-4o-mini (3 cr) | 70% |
| Simple routing with Claude Opus (10 cr) | Gemini Flash (1 cr) | 90% |

**Test the downgrade**: Run 10 tasks with the smaller model. Compare output quality.
Most classification, routing, and extraction tasks work identically on smaller models.

### Step 3: Consolidate Redundant Agents

Multiple single-purpose agents cost more than one multi-purpose agent:

Before (5 agents, 5 minimum credits per run):

```
Agent 1: Classify billing emails
Agent 2: Classify technical emails
Agent 3: Classify general emails
Agent 4: Draft billing responses
Agent 5: Draft technical responses
```

After (1 agent, 1 minimum credit per run):

```
Support Agent: Classify email → Condition (billing/technical/general)
  → Draft appropriate response → Send
```

**Cost impact**: Reducing from 5 agents to 1 saves minimum-credit overhead and
simplifies management.

### Step 4: Optimize Trigger Frequency

Credits are consumed every time a trigger fires. Reduce unnecessary triggers:

**Email Received**:

```
Before: Trigger on ALL emails (300/day) = 300 tasks
After:  Filter: label "support" AND NOT from "noreply@" (40/day) = 40 tasks
Savings: 87% fewer tasks
```

**Schedule trigger**:

```
Before: Every 15 minutes (96/day)
After:  Every 2 hours (12/day)
Question: Does this agent really need to run every 15 minutes?
```

**Slack trigger**:

```
Before: Any message in #general (200/day)
After:  Messages containing "@support-bot" (10/day)
Savings: 95% fewer tasks
```

### Step 5: Reduce Steps Per Task

Each action in a workflow costs credits. Eliminate unnecessary steps:

- Combine multiple LLM calls into one (see `lindy-performance-tuning`)
- Use Set Manually instead of AI Prompt for known values
- Remove debug/logging steps in production
- Simplify condition branches

### Step 6: Optimize Knowledge Base Usage

KB search costs credits per query. Optimize:

- Reduce Max Results from 10 to 4 (sufficient for most queries)
- Use specific query instructions to get relevant results in one search
- For small datasets (<100 entries), consider putting data directly in the prompt

### Step 7: Budget Monitoring Setup

1. Check credit usage weekly in **Settings > Billing**
2. Set internal alerts for high-consumption agents:
   - 50% of budget: Warning — review usage
   - 80% of budget: Alert — optimize or upgrade
   - 95% of budget: Critical — pause non-essential agents

### Step 8: Deactivate Idle Agents

Review agents monthly:

- No tasks in 30 days → Pause the agent
- No tasks in 90 days → Delete or archive
- Lindy only charges for active agent execution, not idle agents

## Monthly Cost Optimization Checklist

- [ ] Review per-agent credit consumption
- [ ] Identify agents using large models for simple tasks
- [ ] Check for redundant agents that could be consolidated
- [ ] Review trigger filter effectiveness
- [ ] Remove unused integrations from agents
- [ ] Verify no loops or runaway agent steps
- [ ] Compare actual spend to budget

## Error Handling

| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|-------|-------|----------|
| Unexpected credit spike | Trigger filter removed or loosened | Review and restore trigger filters |
| Agent consuming 10x normal | Looping agent step | Add exit conditions, check task history |
| Credits exhausted mid-month | Under-budgeted or spike | Upgrade plan or pause non-critical agents |
|
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-09 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__lindy-cost-tuning.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-094f83675ca38aSAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Lindy Cost Tuning skill do?

Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.

Is Lindy Cost Tuning safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Lindy Cost Tuning access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does Lindy Cost Tuning work with?

Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement