Lindy Cost TuningSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: lindy-cost-tuning description: 'Optimize Lindy AI costs through credit management, model selection, and agent consolidation. Use when reducing spend, analyzing credit usage patterns, or optimizing budget allocation across agents. Trigger with phrases like "lindy cost", "lindy billing", "reduce lindy spend", "lindy budget", "lindy credits". ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit version: 1.20.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: - saas - lindy - cost-optimization compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Lindy Cost Tuning ## Overview Lindy uses a credit-based pricing model. Every task costs credits based on model size, step count, premium actions, and duration. Cost tuning targets: model right-sizing, agent consolidation, trigger optimization, and credit monitoring. ## Prerequisites - Lindy workspace with billing access - Multiple active agents to evaluate - Dashboard access to review per-agent task history ## Credit Cost Reference | Factor | Credits | |--------|---------| | Basic model task (Gemini Flash) | 1-2 | | Mid-tier model (GPT-4o-mini, Claude Haiku) | 2-5 | | Large model task (GPT-4, Claude Sonnet) | 5-10 | | Premium model (Claude Opus) | ~10+ | | Phone call (US/Canada) | ~20/minute | | Phone call (international) | 21-53/minute | | Premium actions (webhooks) | Additional per action | | Minimum per task | 1 credit | ## Plan Costs | Plan | Monthly | Credits | Per Extra Seat | |------|---------|---------|----------------| | Free | $0 | 400 | N/A | | Pro | $49.99 | 5,000 | $19.99 | | Business | $299.99 | 30,000 | Included | | Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | ## Instructions ### Step 1: Audit Agent Credit Consumption For each active agent, collect: 1. **Task count** (last 30 days) — from Tasks tab 2. **Average credits per task** — total credits / task count 3. **Model used** — from agent settings 4. **Trigger frequency** — how often the agent fires Create a cost audit table: | Agent | Tasks/Month | Credits/Task | Model | Monthly Credits | % of Total | |-------|------------|-------------|-------|----------------|-----------| | Support Bot | 500 | 5 | Claude Sonnet | 2,500 | 50% | | Lead Router | 200 | 2 | GPT-4o-mini | 400 | 8% | | Report Gen | 30 | 10 | GPT-4 | 300 | 6% | ### Step 2: Right-Size Models The highest-impact optimization. For each agent, ask: > "Does this task actually need GPT-4/Claude, or would Gemini Flash work?" | Current Setup | Optimized | Savings | |--------------|-----------|---------| | Email classify with Claude Sonnet (5 cr) | Gemini Flash (1 cr) | 80% | | Data extract with GPT-4 (10 cr) | GPT-4o-mini (3 cr) | 70% | | Simple routing with Claude Opus (10 cr) | Gemini Flash (1 cr) | 90% | **Test the downgrade**: Run 10 tasks with the smaller model. Compare output quality. Most classification, routing, and extraction tasks work identically on smaller models. ### Step 3: Consolidate Redundant Agents Multiple single-purpose agents cost more than one multi-purpose agent: Before (5 agents, 5 minimum credits per run): ``` Agent 1: Classify billing emails Agent 2: Classify technical emails Agent 3: Classify general emails Agent 4: Draft billing responses Agent 5: Draft technical responses ``` After (1 agent, 1 minimum credit per run): ``` Support Agent: Classify email → Condition (billing/technical/general) → Draft appropriate response → Send ``` **Cost impact**: Reducing from 5 agents to 1 saves minimum-credit overhead and simplifies management. ### Step 4: Optimize Trigger Frequency Credits are consumed every time a trigger fires. Reduce unnecessary triggers: **Email Received**: ``` Before: Trigger on ALL emails (300/day) = 300 tasks After: Filter: label "support" AND NOT from "noreply@" (40/day) = 40 tasks Savings: 87% fewer tasks ``` **Schedule trigger**: ``` Before: Every 15 minutes (96/day) After: Every 2 hours (12/day) Question: Does this agent really need to run every 15 minutes? ``` **Slack trigger**: ``` Before: Any message in #general (200/day) After: Messages containing "@support-bot" (10/day) Savings: 95% fewer tasks ``` ### Step 5: Reduce Steps Per Task Each action in a workflow costs credits. Eliminate unnecessary steps: - Combine multiple LLM calls into one (see `lindy-performance-tuning`) - Use Set Manually instead of AI Prompt for known values - Remove debug/logging steps in production - Simplify condition branches ### Step 6: Optimize Knowledge Base Usage KB search costs credits per query. Optimize: - Reduce Max Results from 10 to 4 (sufficient for most queries) - Use specific query instructions to get relevant results in one search - For small datasets (<100 entries), consider putting data directly in the prompt ### Step 7: Budget Monitoring Setup 1. Check credit usage weekly in **Settings > Billing** 2. Set internal alerts for high-consumption agents: - 50% of budget: Warning — review usage - 80% of budget: Alert — optimize or upgrade - 95% of budget: Critical — pause non-essential agents ### Step 8: Deactivate Idle Agents Review agents monthly: - No tasks in 30 days → Pause the agent - No tasks in 90 days → Delete or archive - Lindy only charges for active agent execution, not idle agents ## Monthly Cost Optimization Checklist - [ ] Review per-agent credit consumption - [ ] Identify agents using large models for simple tasks - [ ] Check for redundant agents that could be consolidated - [ ] Review trigger filter effectiveness - [ ] Remove unused integrations from agents - [ ] Verify no loops or runaway agent steps - [ ] Compare actual spend to budget ## Error Handling | Issue | Cause | Solution | |-------|-------|----------| | Unexpected credit spike | Trigger filter removed or loosened | Review and restore trigger filters | | Agent consuming 10x normal | Looping agent step | Add exit conditions, check task history | | Credits exhausted mid-month | Under-budgeted or spike | Upgrade plan or pause non-critical agents | |
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__lindy-cost-tuning.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Lindy Cost Tuning skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Lindy Cost Tuning safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Lindy Cost Tuning access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Lindy Cost Tuning work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.