Klingai Async WorkflowsSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: klingai-async-workflows description: 'Build async video generation workflows with Kling AI using queues, state machines, and event-driven patterns. Trigger with phrases like ''klingai async'', ''kling ai workflow'', ''klingai pipeline'', ''async video generation''. ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(npm:*), Grep version: 1.18.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: - saas - kling-ai - async - workflows compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Kling AI Async Workflows ## Overview Kling AI video generation is inherently async: you submit a task, then poll or receive a callback when done. This skill covers production patterns for integrating this into larger systems using queues, state machines, and event-driven architectures. ## Core Pattern: Submit + Callback ```python import jwt, time, os, requests BASE = "https://api.klingai.com/v1" def get_headers(): ak, sk = os.environ["KLING_ACCESS_KEY"], os.environ["KLING_SECRET_KEY"] token = jwt.encode( {"iss": ak, "exp": int(time.time()) + 1800, "nbf": int(time.time()) - 5}, sk, algorithm="HS256", headers={"alg": "HS256", "typ": "JWT"} ) return {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}", "Content-Type": "application/json"} def submit_async(prompt, callback_url=None, **kwargs): """Submit task and return immediately.""" body = { "model_name": kwargs.get("model", "kling-v2-master"), "prompt": prompt, "duration": str(kwargs.get("duration", 5)), "mode": kwargs.get("mode", "standard"), } if callback_url: body["callback_url"] = callback_url r = requests.post(f"{BASE}/videos/text2video", headers=get_headers(), json=body) return r.json()["data"]["task_id"] ``` ## Redis Queue Workflow ```python import redis import json r = redis.Redis() # Producer: enqueue video generation requests def enqueue_video_job(prompt, metadata=None): job = { "id": f"job_{int(time.time() * 1000)}", "prompt": prompt, "metadata": metadata or {}, "status": "queued", "created_at": time.time(), } r.lpush("kling:jobs:pending", json.dumps(job)) return job["id"] # Worker: process jobs from queue def process_jobs(max_concurrent=3): active_tasks = {} while True: # Submit new jobs if under concurrency limit while len(active_tasks) < max_concurrent: raw = r.rpop("kling:jobs:pending") if not raw: break job = json.loads(raw) task_id = submit_async(job["prompt"]) active_tasks[task_id] = job r.hset("kling:jobs:active", task_id, json.dumps(job)) # Check active tasks completed = [] for task_id, job in active_tasks.items(): result = requests.get( f"{BASE}/videos/text2video/{task_id}", headers=get_headers() ).json() status = result["data"]["task_status"] if status == "succeed": job["status"] = "completed" job["video_url"] = result["data"]["task_result"]["videos"][0]["url"] r.lpush("kling:jobs:completed", json.dumps(job)) completed.append(task_id) elif status == "failed": job["status"] = "failed" job["error"] = result["data"].get("task_status_msg") r.lpush("kling:jobs:failed", json.dumps(job)) completed.append(task_id) for tid in completed: active_tasks.pop(tid) r.hdel("kling:jobs:active", tid) time.sleep(10) ``` ## State Machine Pattern ```python from enum import Enum from dataclasses import dataclass, field from typing import Optional class JobState(Enum): QUEUED = "queued" SUBMITTING = "submitting" PROCESSING = "processing" DOWNLOADING = "downloading" COMPLETED = "completed" FAILED = "failed" RETRYING = "retrying" @dataclass class VideoJob: prompt: str state: JobState = JobState.QUEUED task_id: Optional[str] = None video_url: Optional[str] = None error: Optional[str] = None attempts: int = 0 max_attempts: int = 3 def can_retry(self) -> bool: return self.state == JobState.FAILED and self.attempts < self.max_attempts def transition(self, new_state: JobState): valid = { JobState.QUEUED: {JobState.SUBMITTING}, JobState.SUBMITTING: {JobState.PROCESSING, JobState.FAILED}, JobState.PROCESSING: {JobState.DOWNLOADING, JobState.FAILED}, JobState.DOWNLOADING: {JobState.COMPLETED, JobState.FAILED}, JobState.FAILED: {JobState.RETRYING}, JobState.RETRYING: {JobState.SUBMITTING}, } if new_state not in valid.get(self.state, set()): raise ValueError(f"Invalid transition: {self.state} -> {new_state}") self.state = new_state ``` ## Multi-Step Pipeline ```python async def video_pipeline(prompt, steps=None): """Chain: generate -> extend -> download -> upload.""" steps = steps or ["generate", "extend", "download"] # Step 1: Generate task_id = submit_async(prompt, duration=5) result = poll_task("/videos/text2video", task_id) # from job-monitoring skill video_url = result["videos"][0]["url"] # Step 2: Extend (optional) if "extend" in steps: ext_r = requests.post(f"{BASE}/videos/video-extend", headers=get_headers(), json={ "task_id": task_id, "prompt": f"Continue: {prompt}", "duration": "5", }).json() ext_result = poll_task("/videos/video-extend", ext_r["data"]["task_id"]) video_url = ext_result["videos"][0]["url"] # Step 3: Download if "download" in steps: video_data = requests.get(video_url).content filepath = f"output/{task_id}.mp4" with open(filepath, "wb") as f: f.write(video_data)
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__klingai-async-workflows.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Klingai Async Workflows skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Klingai Async Workflows safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Klingai Async Workflows access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Klingai Async Workflows work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.