Ideogram Webhooks EventsSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: ideogram-webhooks-events description: >- Verify and reconcile Ideogram async webhooks with Ed25519 signatures, replay controls, deduplication, and polling fallback. Use when implementing or auditing an event receiver. Trigger with "verify an Ideogram webhook", "build Ideogram async callbacks", or "debug duplicate Ideogram events". allowed-tools: Read,Glob,Grep,Write,Edit argument-hint: "<receiver-route> <environment> <replay-window>" version: 1.11.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: [saas, ideogram, webhooks] model: inherit effort: high compatibility: "Designed for Claude Code; receiver tests should use local signed fixtures" --- # Ideogram Webhook Verification and Reconciliation ## Overview Accept Ideogram asynchronous completion only after cryptographic verification and idempotent reconciliation. Use the raw request body, bind all signed headers, acknowledge quickly, and retain polling as a recovery path because delivery is not guaranteed. ## Prerequisites - A public HTTPS receiver, raw-body access, durable event store, queue, and clock. - The submitted `generation_id`, destination object policy, and polling reconciler. - Local Ed25519 fixtures for valid, invalid, stale, duplicate, and rotated-key deliveries. ## Current Contract Async requests can include a webhook URL and return `generation_id`. Ideogram signs callbacks with Ed25519 and publishes keys at `https://api.ideogram.ai/v1/.well-known/jwks.json`. Signed headers identify generation, user, timestamp, key, and signature. Deliveries may duplicate, retries are limited, and polling remains necessary. ## Authentication Webhook trust comes from signature verification, not a shared API key in the callback. Normal polling uses server-side `IDEOGRAM_API_KEY` in the `Api-Key` header; never expose it to the receiver request. ## Instructions 1. Capture the raw body bytes and required generation-ID, user-ID, timestamp, key-ID, and signature headers before JSON parsing. 2. Compute SHA-256 over the raw body and construct the signed message as generation ID, newline, user ID, newline, timestamp, newline, then the lowercase body hash. 3. Resolve the key ID from the JWKS cache and verify the lowercase-hex Ed25519 signature. 4. Enforce a bounded timestamp window and bind the callback to a known submitted generation and expected application tenant. 5. Persist a deduplication record keyed by generation and delivery evidence, return `2xx` quickly, and enqueue processing. 6. Validate safety, download approved output, persist it, and transition state idempotently. 7. On verification failure, refresh JWKS once; on missing delivery, append the returned generation ID to `GET /v1/generations/` and poll that resource. ## Tool Discipline Use Read, Glob, and Grep for receiver, queue, state, and fixtures. Use Write and Edit for approved implementation and tests. Do not expose a receiver, submit paid async work, or replay production events by invocation alone. ## Approval Boundaries Require approval for public routing, production keys, live submissions, replay-window changes, retained identifiers, and storage or publishing. Reject callbacks that cannot be tied to an authorized application operation. ## Error Handling - Never verify reserialized JSON; whitespace changes break raw-body integrity. - Refetch JWKS once on an unknown key or verification failure, then reject. - Duplicate or late valid delivery is an idempotency case, not authority to create another asset. ## Output Return receiver route class, signature and replay result, opaque generation ID, duplicate state, acknowledgment latency, downstream terminal and storage state, polling fallback, and cleanup. Exclude headers, bodies, URLs, prompts, and images. ## Examples - Verify a fixture signed over exact raw bytes, acknowledge, then prove one durable state transition across two deliveries. - Report `signature=pass; replay=fresh; duplicate=yes; transitions=1; poll_fallback=not-needed`. ## Validation Test byte mutation, header mutation, stale timestamps, unknown and rotated keys, duplicates, out-of-order state, unsafe output, polling fallback, and object deletion. Confirm receiver logs contain no signed body or content. ## Resources - [Current first-party evidence map](references/official-docs.md) — use the dated endpoint, webhook, billing, team, and training links as the contract index for this workflow. - Recheck the endpoint-specific page and current OpenAPI description before relying on an enum, limit, beta feature, or lifecycle claim. - Record live observations as environment-specific evidence, not as universal vendor guarantees.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__ideogram-webhooks-events.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Ideogram Webhooks Events skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Ideogram Webhooks Events safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Ideogram Webhooks Events access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Ideogram Webhooks Events work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.