Ideogram Performance TuningSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: ideogram-performance-tuning description: >- Optimize Ideogram latency and throughput through route choice, bounded media, concurrency, async handling, and immediate storage. Use when improving an established workload without weakening quality or safety. Trigger with "speed up Ideogram", "profile Ideogram latency", or "optimize Ideogram throughput". allowed-tools: Read,Glob,Grep,Write,Edit argument-hint: "<workload> <latency-slo> <quality-floor>" version: 1.11.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: [saas, ideogram, performance] model: inherit effort: high compatibility: "Designed for Claude Code; paid benchmarks require a bounded test plan" --- # Ideogram Performance Tuning ## Overview Improve end-to-end time and useful throughput with measurements, not unsupported rendering flags. Separate queue wait, upload, vendor generation, webhook or polling, download, validation, and storage so optimization preserves safety, quality, cost, and asset durability. ## Prerequisites - Representative synthetic workload, latency and throughput SLOs, quality floor, and cost ceiling. - Per-stage metrics, current endpoint mix, output count, media sizes, and concurrency policy. - Approved benchmark budget, isolated destination, and cleanup owner. ## Current Contract Ideogram offers synchronous and asynchronous routes plus V4, transparency, P-Image, V3, and outcome-focused tools. Route-specific rendering options differ; V4 `FLASH` currently returns `400`. Default capacity is 10 in-flight requests, and returned asset URLs require prompt download. ## Authentication Benchmark workers use server-side `IDEOGRAM_API_KEY` through `Api-Key` to `https://api.ideogram.ai`. Metrics label endpoint, status, stage, and content-free workload class, never prompt or image content. ## Instructions 1. Measure queue, upload, generation, reconciliation, download, validation, and storage latency separately at p50, p95, and p99. 2. Confirm the selected endpoint is the narrowest route that meets model, transparency, edit, or tool requirements. 3. Bound input bytes, dimensions, output count, and post-processing; reject work unlikely to meet its deadline. 4. Move long work to async, persist `generation_id`, acknowledge application requests early, and reconcile by webhook plus polling. 5. Tune shared concurrency below observed capacity while tracking `429`, timeout, queue age, and cost per useful output. 6. Compare one change at a time against the quality and safety floor; canary before rollout. 7. Remove benchmark assets and restore the prior setting when any guardrail regresses. ## Tool Discipline Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect metrics, queues, adapters, and fixtures. Use Write and Edit for approved instrumentation or tuning changes. Do not launch a paid benchmark or alter production capacity merely because this skill was selected. ## Approval Boundaries Require owners for benchmark spend, traffic sampling, model or rendering changes, quality evaluation, concurrency increases, and deployment. Never trade away safety checks or durable persistence for lower apparent latency. ## Error Handling - Unsupported V4 `FLASH` is a validation defect, not a performance strategy. - A faster response with an unsafe or unpersisted image is not a successful sample. - Stop a benchmark on rising errors, queue runaway, budget exhaustion, or storage cleanup failure. ## Output Return baseline and candidate stage metrics, route and settings, concurrency, useful-output counts, error and safety rates, cost, statistical limitations, canary state, and rollback receipt. Exclude content and credentials. ## Examples - Move batch generation from synchronous request threads to async submission and webhook reconciliation. - Reduce oversized uploads before increasing concurrency, then compare p95 end-to-end durable completion. ## Validation Repeat the benchmark with the same synthetic workload, compare distributions and guardrails, verify account-wide pressure, and test rollback. Confirm all benchmark objects and temporary URLs are removed. ## Resources - [Current first-party evidence map](references/official-docs.md) — use the dated endpoint, webhook, billing, team, and training links as the contract index for this workflow. - Recheck the endpoint-specific page and current OpenAPI description before relying on an enum, limit, beta feature, or lifecycle claim. - Record live observations as environment-specific evidence, not as universal vendor guarantees.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__ideogram-performance-tuning.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Ideogram Performance Tuning skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Ideogram Performance Tuning safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Ideogram Performance Tuning access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Ideogram Performance Tuning work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.