Groq Ci IntegrationSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: groq-ci-integration description: 'Configure Groq CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions, testing, and model validation. Use when setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines, or integrating Groq tests into your build process. Trigger with phrases like "groq CI", "groq GitHub Actions", "groq automated tests", "CI groq". ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(gh:*) version: 1.11.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: - saas - groq - testing - ci-cd compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Groq CI Integration ## Overview Set up CI/CD pipelines for Groq integrations with unit tests (mocked), integration tests (live API), and model deprecation checks. Groq's fast inference makes live integration tests practical in CI -- a completion round-trip takes < 500ms. ## Prerequisites - GitHub repository with Actions enabled - Groq API key stored as GitHub secret - vitest or jest for testing ## Instructions The integration has four moving parts. Read this section for the high-level flow, then drill into the reference files for the full copy-paste blocks — the complete workflows and configuration live in [references/implementation.md](references/implementation.md) and the full test suite in [references/examples.md](references/examples.md). ### Step 1: GitHub Actions workflow Write `.github/workflows/groq-tests.yml` with three jobs: `unit-tests` (mocked `groq-sdk`, runs on every PR, no key), `integration-tests` (live API, push-to-`main` only, guarded by `if: github.event_name != 'pull_request'`), and a weekly `model-check` cron that diffs the model IDs the code references against Groq's live model list. The job skeleton: ```yaml # .github/workflows/groq-tests.yml — see references/implementation.md for full file on: push: { branches: [main] } pull_request: { branches: [main] } schedule: - cron: "0 6 * * 1" # Weekly model deprecation check jobs: unit-tests: # mocked groq-sdk, no API key integration-tests: # live API, push-to-main only model-check: # curl /v1/models, flag deprecated IDs ``` ### Step 2: Configure secrets Store a CI-scoped key with `gh secret set GROQ_API_KEY --body "gsk_your_ci_key_here"`. Keep it separate from the production key so it rotates and tracks CI usage independently. ### Step 3: Integration test suite Add `tests/groq.integration.ts` gated on a `GROQ_INTEGRATION` env var (so the file is a no-op without a key). It asserts model listing, chat completion, streaming, and JSON mode. Full file: [references/examples.md](references/examples.md). ### Step 4: Release workflow Gate `npm publish` behind a live production Groq round-trip so a broken key or deprecated model blocks the release. Full `release.yml`: [references/implementation.md](references/implementation.md). **CI best practices:** mock `groq-sdk` in unit tests, run integration tests only on `main` push (saves quota), prefer `llama-3.1-8b-instant` (cheapest, fastest) with low `max_tokens` (5-50), add `timeout-minutes: 2`, and schedule the weekly deprecation check. ## Output Applying this skill produces the following files in the target repository: | File | Purpose | |------|---------| | `.github/workflows/groq-tests.yml` | Unit + integration + weekly model-check jobs | | `.github/workflows/release.yml` | Tag-triggered release gated on a live Groq check | | `tests/groq.integration.ts` | `GROQ_INTEGRATION`-gated live API test suite | | `GROQ_API_KEY` GitHub secret | CI-scoped key set via `gh secret set` | At runtime the workflow reports three independent checks in the GitHub Actions panel — `unit-tests` (green without any key), `integration-tests` (verbose per-assertion output on push to `main`), and `model-check` (a code-vs-Groq model diff that exits non-zero on any deprecated model ID). ## Error Handling | Issue | Cause | Solution | |-------|-------|----------| | Secret not found | `GROQ_API_KEY` not configured | `gh secret set GROQ_API_KEY` | | Integration test timeout | Network issue or rate limit | Increase timeout, add retry | | Model check fails | Model deprecated | Update model ID in source code | | Flaky tests | Rate limiting in CI | Add backoff, run integration tests less often | ## Examples **Set the CI secret and scaffold the workflow.** Store a dedicated CI key, then drop in the workflow from the reference file: ```bash gh secret set GROQ_API_KEY --body "gsk_your_ci_key_here" # copy .github/workflows/groq-tests.yml from references/implementation.md ``` **Run the integration suite locally before pushing.** The suite is inert without the flag, so opt in explicitly: ```bash GROQ_INTEGRATION=1 npx vitest tests/groq.integration.ts --reporter=verbose ``` Full walkthroughs: [references/implementation.md](references/implementation.md) (workflows, secrets, release gate) and [references/examples.md](references/examples.md) (complete integration test suite + how to read the CI output). ## Resources - [GitHub Actions Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions) - [Groq API Reference](https://console.groq.com/docs/api-reference) - [Groq Model Deprecations](https://console.groq.com/docs/deprecations) ## Next Steps For deployment patterns — provisioning production keys, environment promotion, and rollback on a failed Groq health check — see the `groq-deploy-integration` skill, which picks up where this CI gate leaves off.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__groq-ci-integration.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Groq Ci Integration skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Groq Ci Integration safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Groq Ci Integration access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Groq Ci Integration work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.