Fathom Core Workflow BSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: fathom-core-workflow-b description: 'Sync Fathom meeting data to CRM and build automated follow-up workflows. Use when integrating Fathom with Salesforce, HubSpot, or custom CRMs, or creating automated post-meeting email summaries. Trigger with phrases like "fathom crm sync", "fathom salesforce", "fathom follow-up", "fathom post-meeting workflow". ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(python3:*), Grep version: 1.6.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: - saas - meeting-intelligence - ai-notes - fathom compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Fathom Core Workflow: CRM Sync & Follow-Up ## Prerequisites - Approved CRM mapping, consent/recording policy, scoped credentials, owner, and synthetic test meeting data. ## Output - A reviewed Fathom-to-CRM follow-up workflow with explicit field mapping, consent/data controls, idempotency, and rollback/disable action. ## Error Handling | Condition | Safe response | |---|---| | CRM record maps incorrectly | Pause sync, correct the field mapping, and validate with a synthetic record before replay. | | Duplicate follow-up is detected | Deduplicate by stable meeting/action ID and do not resend automatically. | | Consent/recording state is unclear | Do not sync or distribute content until the owner verifies it. | ## Examples Use a synthetic meeting summary and test CRM contact to verify field mapping, follow-up creation, and deduplication in development. Record only opaque IDs and outcomes; do not use customer recordings, transcripts, or contacts as a tutorial fixture. ## Overview Automate post-meeting workflows: sync meeting notes to CRM opportunities, send follow-up emails with action items, and maintain a meeting history database. ## Instructions ### Meeting-to-CRM Sync ```python def sync_meeting_to_crm(meeting: dict, crm_client): summary = meeting.get("summary", "") action_items = meeting.get("action_items", []) participants = meeting.get("participants", []) # Find matching CRM contact/opportunity by participant email for email in participants: contact = crm_client.find_contact(email=email) if contact: crm_client.log_activity( contact_id=contact["id"], type="meeting", subject=meeting["title"], body=f"Summary: {summary}\n\nAction Items:\n" + "\n".join(f"- {a['text']}" for a in action_items), date=meeting["created_at"], ) ``` ### Automated Follow-Up Email ```python def generate_followup_email(meeting: dict) -> str: actions = meeting.get("action_items", []) action_list = "\n".join(f"- {a['text']}" for a in actions) return f"""Hi team, Thanks for the meeting: {meeting['title']} Summary: {meeting.get('summary', 'No summary available')} Action Items: {action_list if action_list else '- None recorded'} Best regards""" ``` ### Meeting History Database ```sql CREATE TABLE fathom_meetings ( id VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY, title VARCHAR NOT NULL, created_at TIMESTAMP NOT NULL, duration_seconds INTEGER, summary TEXT, participant_count INTEGER, action_item_count INTEGER, synced_to_crm BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE, synced_at TIMESTAMP ); ``` ## Resources - [Fathom API Reference](https://developers.fathom.ai/api-reference) - Fathom Integrations ## Next Steps For error troubleshooting, see `fathom-common-errors`.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__fathom-core-workflow-b.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Fathom Core Workflow B skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Fathom Core Workflow B safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Fathom Core Workflow B access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Fathom Core Workflow B work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.