Evernote Prod ChecklistSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: evernote-prod-checklist description: 'Production readiness checklist for Evernote integrations. Use when preparing to deploy Evernote integration to production, or auditing production readiness. Trigger with phrases like "evernote production", "deploy evernote", "evernote go live", "production checklist evernote". ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Grep version: 1.13.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: - saas - evernote - deployment - golang - audit compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Evernote Production Checklist ## Overview Comprehensive checklist for deploying Evernote integrations to production, covering API key activation, security hardening, rate limit handling, monitoring, and go-live verification. ## Prerequisites - Completed development and testing in sandbox - Production API key approved by Evernote (requires review process) - Production infrastructure provisioned ## Instructions ### API Key & Authentication - [ ] Production API key requested and approved by Evernote - [ ] `EVERNOTE_SANDBOX=false` in production config - [ ] Consumer key and secret stored in secrets manager (not env files) - [ ] OAuth callback URL uses HTTPS on production domain - [ ] Token expiration tracking implemented (`edam_expires`) - [ ] Token refresh/re-auth flow tested end-to-end ### Security - [ ] Access tokens encrypted at rest (AES-256-GCM) - [ ] CSRF protection on OAuth flow - [ ] API credentials not in source control (`.env` in `.gitignore`) - [ ] Log output redacts tokens and PII - [ ] Input validation on all user-supplied content (ENML sanitization) - [ ] Rate limit handling prevents API key suspension ### Rate Limits & Performance - [ ] Exponential backoff on `RATE_LIMIT_REACHED` errors - [ ] Minimum delay between API calls (100-200ms) - [ ] Response caching for `listNotebooks()` and `listTags()` (5-10 min TTL) - [ ] `findNotesMetadata()` used instead of `findNotes()` for listings - [ ] Batch operations use sequential processing with delays ### Monitoring & Alerting - [ ] Health check endpoint verifies Evernote API connectivity - [ ] Metrics tracked: API call count, latency, error rate, rate limits - [ ] Alerts configured for rate limits, auth failures, and high error rates - [ ] Structured logging with correlation IDs - [ ] Quota usage monitoring with threshold alerts (75%, 90%) ### Data Integrity - [ ] ENML validation before every `createNote`/`updateNote` call - [ ] Note titles sanitized (max 255 chars, no newlines) - [ ] Tag names validated (max 100 chars, no commas) - [ ] Resource hashes verified (MD5 match) - [ ] Sync state (USN) tracked and persisted for incremental sync ### Deployment - [ ] Production Docker image built with multi-stage build - [ ] `NODE_ENV=production` set in container - [ ] Graceful shutdown handles in-flight API calls - [ ] Rollback plan documented and tested - [ ] Deployment verification script runs post-deploy ### Verification Script ```bash #!/bin/bash set -euo pipefail echo "Verifying Evernote production deployment..." # 1. Health check curl -sf "$APP_URL/health" | jq '.evernoteApi' | grep -q '"connected"' echo " Health check: PASS" # 2. Create test note GUID=$(curl -sf "$APP_URL/api/test-note" | jq -r '.guid') echo " Note creation: PASS (GUID: $GUID)" # 3. Clean up test note curl -sf -X DELETE "$APP_URL/api/notes/$GUID" echo " Cleanup: PASS" echo "All checks passed." ``` For the complete checklist details and verification scripts, see [Implementation Guide](references/implementation-guide.md). ## Output - Production readiness checklist (API keys, security, performance, monitoring) - Verification script for post-deployment testing - Security audit checklist for credential and token management - Monitoring setup verification ## Error Handling | Error | Cause | Solution | |-------|-------|----------| | `INVALID_AUTH` in production | Using sandbox token with production endpoint | Verify `EVERNOTE_SANDBOX=false` matches production key | | Verification script fails | Service not healthy after deploy | Check logs, rollback if needed | | Rate limits on launch | Burst of API calls at startup | Add startup delay, warm caches gradually | | `PERMISSION_DENIED` | Production key missing permissions | Contact Evernote developer support | ## Resources - [Evernote Developer Portal](https://dev.evernote.com/) - [API Key Request](https://dev.evernote.com/support/) - [Rate Limits](https://dev.evernote.com/doc/articles/rate_limits.php) - [OAuth Documentation](https://dev.evernote.com/doc/articles/authentication.php) ## Next Steps For version upgrades, see `evernote-upgrade-migration`. ## Examples **Go-live checklist**: Walk through each section, check off items, run the verification script, and sign off with the team before switching DNS to the production deployment. **Security audit**: Review encrypted token storage, verify log redaction, confirm CSRF protection, and test token expiration handling before the production launch.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__evernote-prod-checklist.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Evernote Prod Checklist skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Evernote Prod Checklist safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Evernote Prod Checklist access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Evernote Prod Checklist work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.