Evernote Incident RunbookSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: evernote-incident-runbook description: 'Manage incident response for Evernote integration issues. Use when troubleshooting production incidents, handling outages, or responding to Evernote service issues. Trigger with phrases like "evernote incident", "evernote outage", "evernote emergency", "troubleshoot evernote production". ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(curl:*), Grep version: 1.13.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: - saas - evernote - incident-response compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Evernote Incident Runbook ## Overview Step-by-step procedures for responding to Evernote integration incidents including API outages, rate limit escalations, authentication failures, data sync issues, and quota exhaustion. ## Prerequisites - Access to monitoring dashboards and production logs - Production Evernote API credentials - Communication channels for escalation (Slack, PagerDuty) ## Instructions ### Incident Classification | Severity | Symptoms | Response Time | |----------|----------|---------------| | P1 - Critical | All Evernote API calls failing, data loss risk | 15 minutes | | P2 - High | Persistent rate limits, auth failures for multiple users | 1 hour | | P3 - Medium | Intermittent errors, degraded sync performance | 4 hours | | P4 - Low | Single user issues, non-critical feature affected | Next business day | ### Step 1: Triage Check Evernote's status page first. If Evernote is down, activate the circuit breaker and wait. ```bash # Check Evernote service status curl -sf https://status.evernote.com/api/v2/status.json | jq '.status' # Check your API connectivity curl -sf -H "Authorization: Bearer $EVERNOTE_TOKEN" \ https://www.evernote.com/shard/s1/notestore | head -20 # Check error rate in logs (last 15 min) grep -c 'EDAMSystemException' /var/log/evernote-app.log ``` ### Step 2: Rate Limit Escalation If rate limits are persistent: reduce API call frequency, increase delays between batch operations, and contact Evernote developer support for a rate limit increase. ### Step 3: Authentication Failure For auth failures: verify tokens are not expired (`edam_expires`), check that production credentials match the production endpoint (`sandbox: false`), and test with a fresh Developer Token to isolate the issue. ### Step 4: Sync Failure Recovery For sync issues: compare local USN with server USN via `getSyncState()`. If gap is too large, reset to full sync from USN 0. Verify data integrity after re-sync. ### Step 5: Mitigation Strategies - **Circuit breaker**: Disable Evernote API calls after N consecutive failures. Retry after cooldown period. - **Graceful degradation**: Serve cached data when API is unavailable. Queue writes for retry. - **Failover**: Switch to polling-based sync if webhooks stop arriving. ### Post-Incident - Document root cause and timeline - Update runbook with new failure modes discovered - Adjust alert thresholds if false positive or missed detection - Review and improve circuit breaker settings For the complete diagnostic scripts, mitigation implementations, and communication templates, see [Implementation Guide](references/implementation-guide.md). ## Output - Incident severity classification table - Triage diagnostic commands for quick assessment - Rate limit, auth, and sync failure response procedures - Circuit breaker and graceful degradation patterns - Post-incident review checklist ## Error Handling | Incident Type | Diagnostic | Mitigation | |---------------|------------|------------| | API outage | Check `status.evernote.com` | Activate circuit breaker, serve cached data | | Rate limit storm | Check `evernote_rate_limits_total` metric | Reduce batch sizes, increase delays | | Mass auth failure | Verify token expiration dates in DB | Trigger re-auth flow for affected users | | Sync data loss | Compare local vs server note counts | Full re-sync from USN 0 | ## Resources - [Evernote Status Page](https://status.evernote.com/) - [Evernote Developer Support](https://dev.evernote.com/support/) - [Error Handling](https://dev.evernote.com/doc/articles/error_handling.php) ## Next Steps For data handling best practices, see `evernote-data-handling`. ## Examples **API outage response**: Alert fires, on-call checks status page, confirms Evernote outage, activates circuit breaker, posts status update to internal Slack, monitors for recovery, then gradually re-enables API calls. **Rate limit recovery**: Persistent `RATE_LIMIT_REACHED` errors detected. Reduce batch size from 100 to 10, increase delay to 500ms, clear the request queue, and contact Evernote support if limits continue after 1 hour.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__evernote-incident-runbook.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Evernote Incident Runbook skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Evernote Incident Runbook safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Evernote Incident Runbook access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Evernote Incident Runbook work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.