Customerio Prod ChecklistSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: customerio-prod-checklist description: 'Execute Customer.io production deployment checklist. Use when preparing for production launch, auditing integration quality, or performing pre-launch validation. Trigger: "customer.io production", "customer.io checklist", "deploy customer.io", "customer.io go-live", "customer.io launch". ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(curl:*), Bash(npx:*), Glob, Grep version: 1.14.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: - saas - customer-io - deployment - production - audit compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Customer.io Production Checklist ## Instructions 1. Complete every production gate with an evidence link: workspace/environment, identity, secret scope, consent, event/schema, template review, observability, rate limits, and rollback. 2. Verify the exact production audience and suppression/consent behavior using approved safe checks. 3. Hold release when any data, identity, delivery, or owner gate is unverified. 4. Record the named go/no-go decision and post-deployment observation result. ## Output - A production-readiness receipt with owners, evidence, exceptions, and tested rollback path. ## Examples Before enabling a campaign, validate it in staging with synthetic profiles, confirm the production segment and consent/suppression logic under review, and use an approved canary audience. If the canary differs from expected behavior, stop the launch and restore the previous version rather than widening sends. ## Overview Comprehensive go-live checklist for Customer.io integrations: credentials audit, integration quality review, email deliverability setup, monitoring configuration, smoke tests, and staged rollout plan. ## Prerequisites - Customer.io integration complete and tested in staging - Production workspace credentials ready - Sending domain configured and verified ## Production Checklist ### 1. Credentials & Configuration | Item | Check | How to Verify | |------|-------|---------------| | Production Site ID | Correct workspace | Settings > API & Webhook Credentials | | Production Track API Key | Different from dev/staging | Compare with staging `.env` | | Production App API Key | Set for transactional messages | Test with `curl` bearer auth | | Region setting | Matches account region (US/EU) | Settings > Workspace Settings | | Secrets storage | In secrets manager, not `.env` | Check deployment config | | Key rotation schedule | Documented (90-day cycle) | Calendar reminder set | ### 2. Integration Quality ```typescript // scripts/prod-audit.ts import { TrackClient, RegionUS } from "customerio-node"; async function auditIntegration() { const checks: { name: string; pass: boolean; detail: string }[] = []; // Check 1: Credentials exist const siteId = process.env.CUSTOMERIO_SITE_ID; const trackKey = process.env.CUSTOMERIO_TRACK_API_KEY; const appKey = process.env.CUSTOMERIO_APP_API_KEY; checks.push({ name: "Track credentials", pass: !!(siteId && trackKey), detail: siteId ? `Site ID: ${siteId.substring(0, 4)}...` : "MISSING", }); checks.push({ name: "App API credential", pass: !!appKey, detail: appKey ? "Set" : "MISSING (needed for transactional)", }); // Check 2: API connectivity if (siteId && trackKey) { const cio = new TrackClient(siteId, trackKey, { region: RegionUS }); try { await cio.identify("prod-audit-test", { email: "[email protected]", }); await cio.suppress("prod-audit-test"); checks.push({ name: "Track API", pass: true, detail: "Connected" }); } catch (err: any) { checks.push({ name: "Track API", pass: false, detail: `${err.statusCode}: ${err.message}`, }); } } // Report console.log("\n=== Customer.io Production Audit ===\n"); for (const check of checks) { const icon = check.pass ? "PASS" : "FAIL"; console.log(`[${icon}] ${check.name}: ${check.detail}`); } const passed = checks.filter((c) => c.pass).length; console.log(`\nResult: ${passed}/${checks.length} passed`); return checks.every((c) => c.pass); } auditIntegration().then((ok) => process.exit(ok ? 0 : 1)); ``` ### 3. Email Deliverability | Item | Status | Dashboard Location | |------|--------|-------------------| | Sending domain verified | Required | Settings > Sending Domains | | SPF record published | Required | DNS TXT record | | DKIM record published | Required | DNS CNAME record | | DMARC policy set | Recommended | DNS TXT record `_dmarc.yourdomain.com` | | Return-Path configured | Recommended | Settings > Sending Domains | | Unsubscribe link in all marketing emails | Required (CAN-SPAM) | Template editor | | Physical address in marketing emails | Required (CAN-SPAM) | Template editor | ### 4. Campaign Readiness - [ ] All campaigns tested with test sends - [ ] Liquid templates render correctly (preview with real data) - [ ] Segment conditions verified with known test users - [ ] Transactional templates have all required `message_data` fields - [ ] Broadcast triggers tested end-to-end - [ ] Unsubscribe flow tested (click unsubscribe link, verify suppression) ### 5. Monitoring & Alerting ```typescript // Set up these alerts in your monitoring system: const ALERT_THRESHOLDS = { // API health api_error_rate: 0.01, // Alert if > 1% of API calls fail api_p99_latency_ms: 5000, // Alert if p99 > 5 seconds // Delivery health bounce_rate: 0.05, // Alert if > 5% bounce rate complaint_rate: 0.001, // Alert if > 0.1% spam complaints delivery_rate: 0.95, // Alert if < 95% delivery rate // Operational health queue_depth: 10000, // Alert if event queue > 10K pending webhook_error_rate: 0.05, // Alert if > 5% webhook processing failures }; ``` ### 6. Smoke Test Script ```bash #!/usr/bin/env bash set -euo pipefail echo "=== Customer.io Production Smoke Test ===" # Test 1: Track API
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__customerio-prod-checklist.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Customerio Prod Checklist skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Customerio Prod Checklist safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Customerio Prod Checklist access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Customerio Prod Checklist work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.