Coderabbit Core Workflow BSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: coderabbit-core-workflow-b description: >- Tune review signal with current learnings, detected guideline files, path instructions, and measured feedback. Use when this operator task needs a current, evidence-backed CodeRabbit workflow. Trigger with "tune CodeRabbit reviews". allowed-tools: Read,Glob,Grep,Write,Edit version: 2.0.0 argument-hint: "[target] [evidence-or-scope]" model: inherit effort: high author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> license: MIT compatibility: Requires current CodeRabbit documentation and approved access for any live organization, repository, billing, or API change tags: [saas, coderabbit, learnings, guidelines, review-quality] --- # CodeRabbit Learnings and Guidelines ## Overview Improve relevance using supported knowledge layers. Avoid invented configuration keys and judge changes against labeled real findings. ## Prerequisites - Identify the CodeRabbit organization, Git provider, repository, plan, and accountable owner. - Read `references/official-docs.md` and re-check any time-sensitive contract before execution. - Use synthetic or read-only evidence until the approval boundary is satisfied. - Preserve the repository's independent CI, security, and human-review requirements. ## Current Contract - Learnings arise from natural-language interaction with review comments. - Code guidelines can be detected from files such as `CLAUDE.md` and `AGENTS.md`. - Path instructions guide review; path filters change scope. - Configuration precedence can change the effective result. ## Authentication Treat Git-provider sessions, CodeRabbit web sessions, CLI credentials, and CodeRabbit API keys as separate credentials. Use only an already-approved session or secret-manager reference, never print a secret, and do not place credentials in `.coderabbit.yaml`, source files, logs, or deliverables. ## Instructions 1. Sample accepted, rejected, and unresolved findings. 2. Separate organization guidance, repository rules, path instructions, and temporary feedback. 3. Draft one supported measurable tuning change and validate resolved config. 4. Pilot comparable PRs and retain only improvements that preserve risky-path coverage. ## Tool Discipline - Use **Glob** to locate candidate configuration and evidence files without widening scope. - Use **Grep** to find relevant fields, commands, identifiers, and stale claims. - Use **Read** to inspect the smallest required files and authoritative evidence. - Use **Write** only for a new approved local draft or evidence artifact. - Use **Edit** only for a bounded approved change whose rollback is known. - Do not use these file tools as a substitute for authenticated CodeRabbit or provider operations. ## Approval Boundaries Require owner approval before changing shared learnings, global overrides, or exclusions. Keep analysis and drafts local until approval is explicit, and record who approved the action and its scope. ## Output A labeled sample, hypothesis, supported change, comparison metrics, and rollback decision. Include source dates, unknowns, and the exact boundary between observed fact and recommendation. ## Error Handling | Condition | Response | |---|---| | Current contract is unclear or docs disagree | Stop mutation, cite both sources, and request owner resolution. | | Required access or approval is missing | Produce a draft and evidence plan only. | | Validation or pilot behavior differs from expectation | Restore the prior state and retain the failed evidence. | | Output contains secrets or private code | Stop, quarantine the artifact, redact it, and notify the data owner. | ## Examples ### Example 1 Move a durable convention into `AGENTS.md` and verify detection. ### Example 2 Replace unsupported `custom_patterns` with documented path instructions. ## Validation - Confirm every claim against the dated sources in `references/official-docs.md`. - Verify the requested scope, owner, approval, happy path, failure path, and rollback. - Re-read the effective configuration or provider state after any approved change. - Report unsupported fields, undocumented endpoints, and unverified assumptions as failures. ## Resources - [Official documentation and contract notes](references/official-docs.md) - Re-check the dated contract before any live operation. - Treat unresolved or changed vendor behavior as a stop condition.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__coderabbit-core-workflow-b.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Coderabbit Core Workflow B skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Coderabbit Core Workflow B safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Coderabbit Core Workflow B access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.