Building Cicd PipelinesSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
From the repository's own README, as read at the audited commit. Badges and raw HTML are left out.
Bundled resources for ci-cd-pipeline-builder skill
- [ ] githubactionstemplate.yml Template for GitHub Actions pipelines.
- [ ] gitlabcitemplate.yml Template for GitLab CI pipelines.
- [ ] jenkins_template.groovy Template for Jenkins pipelines.
- [ ] examplepipelineconfigurations/ Example configurations for various use cases (e.g., web app deployment, microservice deployment).
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: building-cicd-pipelines description: 'Execute use when you need to work with deployment and CI/CD. This skill provides deployment automation and pipeline orchestration with comprehensive guidance and automation. Trigger with phrases like "deploy application", "create pipeline", or "automate deployment". ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash(git:*), Bash(docker:*), Bash(kubectl:*) version: 1.24.0 author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> license: MIT tags: - devops - deployment - ci-cd compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Building CI/CD Pipelines ## Current State !`ls .github/workflows/*.yml .gitlab-ci.yml Jenkinsfile .circleci/config.yml 2>/dev/null || echo 'No CI/CD config found'` ## Overview Generate CI/CD pipeline configurations for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI, and Azure DevOps. Produce multi-stage workflows covering linting, testing, building container images, security scanning, and deploying to staging/production with proper gating and rollback mechanisms. ## Prerequisites - Git repository hosted on a supported platform (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps) - Container runtime (Docker) if building images - Target deployment environment credentials configured as pipeline secrets - Test suite that can run headlessly (`npm test`, `pytest`, `go test`, etc.) - Understanding of branching strategy (trunk-based, GitFlow, or environment branches) ## Instructions 1. Scan the project for existing CI/CD configuration files (`.github/workflows/`, `.gitlab-ci.yml`, `Jenkinsfile`, `.circleci/config.yml`) 2. Identify the application stack: language, framework, test runner, package manager, and deployment target 3. Define pipeline stages: `lint` -> `test` -> `build` -> `security-scan` -> `deploy-staging` -> `integration-test` -> `deploy-production` 4. Generate the pipeline configuration file with appropriate triggers (push to main, PR events, tags) 5. Add caching for dependencies (`node_modules`, `.pip-cache`, Go modules) to reduce build times 6. Configure matrix builds for multiple language versions or OS targets where appropriate 7. Add secret references for deployment credentials, container registry tokens, and API keys (never hardcode) 8. Implement deployment gates: manual approval for production, automated rollback on health check failure 9. Add status badges and notifications (Slack, email) for build results 10. Validate the pipeline syntax using platform-specific tools (`actionlint`, `gitlab-ci-lint`) ## Output - Pipeline configuration files (`.github/workflows/*.yml`, `.gitlab-ci.yml`, `Jenkinsfile`) - Dockerfile for container builds (multi-stage, minimal base image) - Deployment scripts or Kubernetes manifests referenced by the pipeline - Environment-specific variable files for staging vs. production ## Error Handling | Error | Cause | Solution | |-------|-------|---------| | `Pipeline triggered but no jobs run` | Trigger conditions (paths, branches) do not match | Review `on:` / `only:` / `rules:` filters and verify branch names | | `Docker build failed: layer cache miss` | Cache key changed or cache storage expired | Use content-based cache keys (`hashFiles('**/package-lock.json')`) and verify cache backend | | `Secret not found` | Secret name mismatch or not set in pipeline settings | Check secret names match exactly (case-sensitive) in repository/project settings | | `Deploy failed: unauthorized` | Expired or incorrect deployment credentials | Rotate credentials, update pipeline secrets, and verify IAM role/service account permissions | | `Tests pass locally but fail in CI` | Environment differences (OS, node version, timezone) | Pin runtime versions in pipeline config; use `matrix` to test across environments | ## Examples - "Create a GitHub Actions workflow for a Node.js app: lint with ESLint, test with Jest, build Docker image, push to ECR, deploy to EKS staging on PR merge." - "Generate a GitLab CI pipeline with parallel test jobs, SAST scanning, and manual production deployment gate." - "Build a Jenkins pipeline that runs Python tests in a Docker agent, publishes coverage to SonarQube, and deploys via Terraform." ## Resources - GitHub Actions: https://docs.github.com/en/actions - GitLab CI/CD: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/ - Jenkins Pipeline: https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/ - CI/CD best practices: https://martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__building-cicd-pipelines.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Building Cicd Pipelines skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Building Cicd Pipelines safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Building Cicd Pipelines access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Building Cicd Pipelines work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.