Attio Core Workflow ABLOCK
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned | |
| cursor | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: attio-core-workflow-a description: >- Implement a safe Attio record lifecycle for standard or custom objects, including schema discovery, query, create or assert, update, and delete controls. Use when building record synchronization or CRM write paths. Trigger with "Attio records", "Attio CRUD", or "sync Attio objects". argument-hint: "[repository-path] [object-slug] [operation]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.8.0 author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> license: MIT tags: - saas - attio - records model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # Attio Record Lifecycle ## Overview This skill builds a record workflow from the workspace's actual object and attribute schema. It favors deterministic identity and reversible updates over blind create calls. ## Prerequisites - A named object slug or UUID and the target workspace - Current attribute definitions for that object - A stable matching attribute for assert or deduplication - An approved write and deletion boundary ## Tool Discipline Use `Read`, `Glob`, and `Grep` to inspect the local data model, mapping code, tests, and request wrapper. Use `WebFetch` only for current official Attio documentation. Use `Write` or `Edit` after the object contract and approval boundary are explicit. ## Current Contract - Objects define attributes; records are instances of an object. - Record values are shaped by each attribute type, not by one universal scalar rule. - Query records with `POST /v2/objects/:object/records/query`; this endpoint uses `limit` and `offset`. - Choose create versus assert deliberately. Assert is appropriate only when a documented matching attribute supplies stable identity. - `PUT` and `PATCH` have different multiselect behavior; confirm the endpoint reference before updating. ## Authentication Send a single-workspace or OAuth access token as `Authorization: Bearer <access_token>`. Confirm the endpoint's object-configuration and record-permission scopes before any write. ## Instructions 1. Resolve the object and fetch its current attribute definitions. 2. Map source fields to exact attribute slugs and value shapes; reject unknown mappings. 3. Choose query, create, or assert based on the integration's identity policy. 4. For updates, state whether multiselect values must be overwritten or appended and select the documented method. 5. Persist the Attio record ID and source identity mapping after a successful write. 6. Read the record back and compare only the fields owned by this integration. 7. Require explicit approval before deletion and verify the exact record identity afterward. ## Approval Boundaries Never infer a destructive target from a display name. Record deletion, bulk writes, schema changes, and overwrite updates require the exact workspace, object, record IDs, and owner approval. ## Output Return the schema snapshot, identity rule, request plan, redacted response evidence, read-after-write comparison, and rollback or cleanup status. ## Error Handling | Condition | Response | |---|---| | Attribute slug is absent | Stop and refresh object definitions. | | Assert matches unexpectedly | Stop; reconcile the matching attribute and source identity. | | Multiselect result is wrong | Check `PUT` versus `PATCH` semantics before retrying. | | Delete target is ambiguous | Refuse deletion and return candidate IDs for review. | ## Examples Input: ```text object=companies; operation=assert; match=domains; owned-fields=description,domains ``` Expected handoff: ```text schema=confirmed; identity=stable; write=verified; foreign-fields=untouched ``` ## Resources - [Skill-specific official documentation](references/official-docs.md) - [Objects and lists](https://docs.attio.com/docs/objects-and-lists) - [List records](https://docs.attio.com/rest-api/endpoint-reference/records/list-records) - [OpenAPI specification](https://docs.attio.com/rest-api/endpoint-reference/openapi)
Trust audit
BLOCKgrade D · trust 69/100 Do not install this without reading the findings. The audit found something that could harm you or your machine.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | FAIL |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
Send a single-workspace or OAuth access token as `Authorization: Bearer <access_token>`. Confirm the endpoint's object-configuration and record-permission scopes before any write.
Gates applied: critical_finding, no_behavioural_pass, undeclared_transfer.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__attio-core-workflow-a.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f83675ca38a | BLOCK | D | 69 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Attio Core Workflow A skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Attio Core Workflow A safe to install?
No — not without reading the findings first. The audit graded it D (69/100) and found 1 critical or high issue in the source. Each one is listed on this page with the file and line it is on.
What can Attio Core Workflow A access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Attio Core Workflow A work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code and cursor. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.