Adobe Known PitfallsCAUTION
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: adobe-known-pitfalls description: >- Detect current high-risk Adobe integration traps before they become production incidents. Use when the task requires adobe integration pitfall review. Trigger with "Adobe pitfalls", "review Adobe integration", or "find obsolete Adobe code". allowed-tools: Read,Glob,Grep,Write,Edit argument-hint: "<repository> <services> <environment>" version: 1.8.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: [saas, adobe, review] model: inherit effort: high compatibility: "Designed for Claude Code; live Adobe actions require network access, appropriate entitlement and authentication, and explicit approval" --- # Adobe Integration Pitfall Review ## Overview Detect current high-risk Adobe integration traps before they become production incidents. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and evidence before any live side effect. ## Prerequisites - Current first-party Adobe documentation for every selected service, API version, auth flow, limit, and lifecycle. - Named product, identity, security, data, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the scope. - Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures with secret and content canaries. ## Current Contract High-risk traps include Service Account JWT, confusing S2S with user auth, missing entitlements/profiles, secrets in clients, retired Photoshop v1 and Lightroom Firefly Services, reconstructed async URLs, leaked signed URLs, fixed limits, unverified events, and wrong App Builder workspace. Recheck the dated evidence map before relying on mutable product behavior. ## Authentication Review effective authority and secret flow before code style. A valid token, installed SDK, or successful deploy does not prove product entitlement or correct data ownership. ## Instructions 1. Read manifests, locks, config, adapters, routes, workflows, logs, dashboards, tests, and runbooks. 2. Glob and Grep for JWT, /sensei/cutout, Lightroom Firefly Services, client-side secrets, fixed quotas, and hardcoded job routes. 3. Trace auth ownership, product profiles, versions, signed URLs, async states, retries, events, workspaces, and cleanup. 4. Classify each finding as obsolete, unsafe, brittle, undocumented, environment-specific, or stale evidence. 5. Propose the smallest compatible correction with tests, canary, rollback, and named owner. 6. Edit only approved repository artifacts, rerun gates, and record unresolved external dependencies. ## Tool Discipline Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, Adobe content, consent, uploads, generation, spend, deployment, registration changes, replay, cancellation, or deletion. ## Approval Boundaries Read-only review needs no mutation authority. Credential/profile changes, production calls, deploys, replays, registration changes, and deletion require separate explicit approval. ## Error Handling - Do not replace one remembered constant with another. - Do not infer a product from a similarly named Adobe API. - Do not auto-fix secrets without coordinated rotation and revocation. ## Output Return findings with file/line evidence, current sources, severity, correction, test, owner, and unresolved risks. Mark assumptions, observed environment behavior, owners, evidence dates, and unresolved gaps explicitly. ## Examples - Find a retired endpoint in code and documentation. - Find a status URL reconstructed from jobId instead of response evidence. ## Validation Exercise and record expected and observed results for: - JWT - Photoshop v1 - Lightroom EOL - client secret - fixed limit - forged event ## Resources - [Current first-party evidence map](references/official-docs.md) — recheck dated Adobe sources before execution. - Treat observed tenant or product behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal Adobe guarantee.
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | FAIL |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not autho
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__adobe-known-pitfalls.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 4f83675ca38a | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Adobe Known Pitfalls skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Adobe Known Pitfalls safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 1 thing worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Adobe Known Pitfalls access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Adobe Known Pitfalls work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.