Adk EngineerSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
bbcc1b9f30e4OBSERVED · 2026-10-12Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: adk-engineer description: 'Execute software engineer specializing in creating production-ready ADK agents with best practices, code structure, testing, and deployment automation. Use when asked to "build ADK agent", "create agent code", or "engineer ADK application". Trigger with relevant phrases based on skill purpose. ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash(cmd:*) version: 2.19.0 author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> license: MIT effort: high tags: - ai - deployment - testing compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # ADK Engineer Engineer production-ready Agent Development Kit (ADK) agents and multi-agent systems: clean structure, testability, safe tool usage, and deployment automation. ## Overview Use this skill to design and implement ADK agent code that is maintainable and shippable: clear module boundaries, structured tool interfaces, regression tests, and a deployment checklist (local or Agent Engine). ## Prerequisites - A target runtime (Python/Java/Go) consistent with the project’s pinned versions - ADK installed (and any required model/provider SDKs configured) - A test runner available in the repo (unit tests at minimum) - If deploying: access to a Google Cloud project and permissions for the chosen deployment target ## Instructions 1. Clarify requirements: agent goals, tool surface, latency/cost constraints, and deployment target. 2. Propose architecture: single agent vs multi-agent, orchestration pattern, state strategy (Memory Bank / external store). 3. Scaffold structure: agent entrypoint(s), tool modules, config, and tests. 4. Implement incrementally: - add one tool at a time with input validation and structured outputs - add regression tests for each tool and critical prompt flows 5. Add operational guardrails: retries/backoff, timeouts, logging, and safe error messages. 6. Validate locally (tests + smoke prompts) and provide a deployment plan (when requested). ## Output - A concrete architecture plan and file layout - Agent and tool implementations (or patches) with tests - A validation checklist (commands to run, expected outputs, and failure triage) - Optional: deployment instructions and post-deploy health checks ## Error Handling - Build/test failures: isolate the failing module, minimize the repro, fix, and add a regression test. - Tool/runtime errors: enforce structured error responses and safe retries where appropriate. - Deployment failures: provide the exact failing command, logs to inspect, and least-privilege IAM fixes. ## Examples **Example: Productionizing an existing ADK agent** - Request: “Refactor this agent into a clean module structure and add tests before we deploy.” - Result: reorganized `src/` layout, tool boundaries, a test suite, and a deployment checklist. **Example: Multi-agent workflow** - Request: “Build a validator + deployer + monitor agent team with a sequential orchestrator.” - Result: orchestrator skeleton, per-agent responsibilities, and smoke tests for each step. ## Resources - Full detailed playbook (kept for reference): `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/SKILL.full.md` - Repo standards (source of truth): - `000-docs/6767-a-SPEC-DR-STND-claude-code-plugins-standard.md` - `000-docs/6767-b-SPEC-DR-STND-claude-skills-standard.md` - ADK / Agent Engine docs:
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
SYSTEM_INSTRUCTION = """You are a senior code reviewer for Python projects.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
bbcc1b9f30e4full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__adk-engineer.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | bbcc1b9f30e4 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Adk Engineer skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Adk Engineer safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Adk Engineer access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Adk Engineer work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (bbcc1b9f30e4), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.