Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Verify Bug

skill · HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standardMIT licenceAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 6f5be687a268

★ 575pushed today
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 6f5be68
575repo stars · whole HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 6f5be687a268 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Post-merge UAT verification workflow. Walks JIRA reproduce steps, performs comparative audits (Before/After), attaches evidence to JIRA, and transitions status on PASS.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Verify Bug (HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403/verify-bug

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 6f5be687a268 · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • PublisherHoangNguyen0403 GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderHoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/.codex/skills/verify-bugThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict6f5be687a268A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedPushed today
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Post-merge UAT verification workflow. Walks JIRA reproduce steps, performs comparative audits (Before/After), attaches evidence to JIRA, and transitions status on PASS.

---
name: verify-bug
description: "Post-merge UAT verification workflow. Walks JIRA reproduce steps, performs comparative audits (Before/After), attaches evidence to JIRA, and transitions status on PASS."
metadata:
  internal: true
  triggers:
    keywords:
    - verify bug
    - workflow
---
# Verify Bug Skill

> [!IMPORTANT]
> Post-merge UAT verification workflow. Walks JIRA reproduce steps, performs comparative audits (Before/After), attaches evidence to JIRA, and transitions status on PASS.

Optional args: slug=<feature>, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=<id>, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.

## Instructions

When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:


# Verify-Bug — UAT Audit

Goal: Prove a bug fix works in the UAT environment via comparative Before/After evidence, then transition ticket status.

## Input

`/verify-bug <jira-url-or-key> [--baseline-image <url>]`

## Workflow

### Step 0: Pre-flight & Data Gathering

> [!TIP]
> **Sub-Agent Delegation**: If your platform supports sub-agents (e.g., Claude, OpenCode, Gemini, Kiro), delegate steps 1-3 below to your JIRA Analyst sub-agent (e.g., `@specialist-jira-analyst`). If sub-agents are NOT supported (e.g., Antigravity, Windsurf), you must execute these steps yourself.

1.  **Parse JIRA**: Extract `Market`, `Reproduce steps`, and `Expected Result`.
2.  **Resolve Markets**: If multiple markets, prompt for scope (Full/Sample/Custom).
3.  **Fetch Test Data**: Call Confluence for `Test data - <MARKET> UAT`. Parse credentials and module-specific data (e.g., customer codes).
4.  **Credential Check**: Rule out expired accounts before starting sessions.
5.  **Fallback**: If Jira/Confluence MCPs are unavailable, request exported ticket/test-data text and continue with local evidence.

### Step 1: Comparative Audit (Execution Phase)

For each market in scope:

1.  **Environment Setup**: Run the DNS probe from `<SKILLS>/common/common-web-visual-testing/references/diagnostic-decoder.md`; if it indicates VPN is required, connect VPN and retry.
2.  **Named Session**: Run the driver skill's `scripts/preflight.sh`, then start `playwright-cli -s={TICKET}-{MARKET}` (Playwright MCP with `--output-dir .playwright-cli/{TICKET}-{MARKET}` on no-shell runtimes) or an Appium MCP session. Evidence lands in that session dir; a missing driver with no exported evidence is `BLOCKED (driver: <name>)`.
3.  **Walk Steps**: Execute reproduction steps.
    - **Hover Discipline**: Always `hover` the target element (warning, button, price) before screenshotting.
    - **Stability**: Disable animations and mask dynamic fields (clocks, balances).
4.  **Verdict Determination**:
    - **PASS**: End-state matches `Expected Result`.
    - **FAIL**: End-state matches `Actual Result` or original bug screenshot.
    - **NEEDS-HUMAN**: Deviates from both.

### Step 2: Automated Failure Diagnostic

If the verdict is NOT PASS:

1.  **Run Decoder**: Load `common-web-visual-testing`; if synced references are available, consult `<SKILLS>/common/common-web-visual-testing/references/diagnostic-decoder.md`.
2.  **Categorize**: Is it a `VPN NOT CONNECTED` error? `ACCOUNT BLOCKED`? Or a genuine `CODE REGRESSION`?
3.  **Label**: Add the diagnostic label to the JIRA comment.

### Step 3: Evidence & JIRA Sync

1.  **Upload**: Push screenshots from the session evidence dir as attachments to the JIRA ticket.
2.  **Wiki Comment**: Post a verdict comment using JIRA Wiki Markup (orientation-aware widths).
    - Use `🟢 PASS` / `🔴 FAIL` badges.
    - Embed the most diagnostic screenshot inline.
3.  **Status Transition**:
    - If **PASS**: `Ready for UAT` → `Ready for Production`.
    - If **FAIL**: → `Reopened`.
4.  **Walkthrough**:
    - Use the **Walkthrough Template** below.
    - Update project-local `docs/srs/srs-walkthrough-[slug].md`.

## Runtime Contract
- Use for post-merge UAT verification of a bug fix against JIRA reproduce steps.
- Required inputs: JIRA URL/key or exported ticket text with reproduce steps and expected result.
- Return NEEDS-HUMAN only when the end-state deviates from both expected and original-bug behavior.

## Handoff Payload
- `slug`, `operator_profile` (carried, not re-inferred), verdict (PASS/FAIL/NEEDS-HUMAN), walkthrough path, diagnostic label, outcome report, next workflow.

## Blocking Questions
- Ask max 3 at a time with a recommended default and 2-3 options.

## Artifact Templates

### Walkthrough Template

```md
# Walkthrough: [Name]

## Scope

## Acceptance Criteria

## Evidence

| Check   | Result              | Evidence   |
| ------- | ------------------- | ---------- |
| [check] | [PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED] | [evidence] |

## Risks

## Outcome Report
{schema_version: 1, run_id: "[run-id]", slug: "[slug]", workflow: verify-bug, feature_status: verified, started_at: "[timestamp]", completed_at: "[timestamp]", requirement_trace: {brd_objectives: [], requirements: [], acceptance_criteria: [], srs: []}, completed_evidence: [], missing_evidence: [], decision_needed: [], recommended_next_workflow: deploy-release, cost: {source: unavailable}, agent: {identity: "[agent-identity]", model: "[model]"}}

## Next Workflow
deploy-release | dev-fix
```

## Cost Report

Call `get_session_cost(workflow="verify-bug")` before final handoff.

## Anti-Patterns

- **No Sequential Runs**: Verify all markets in parallel.
- **No Unnamed Sessions**: Traceability depends on `-s={TICKET}`.
- **No Mystery Failures**: Always include the Diagnostic Decoder result in FAIL comments.
- **No Orphan Comments**: Clean up "temp media" comments after posting the final verdict.

Excerpt, first 5,659 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 6f5be68

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
git -C agent-skills-standard checkout 6f5be687a268

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 6f5be687a268 only.

Works in which agents?

What its own text says, not a test

AgentStatusMore
WindsurfMentioned in its text, not testedSkills for Windsurf · About Windsurf
“Mentioned” means the skill’s text names the agent. We have not run it there.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 6f5be687a268

README badge

For maintainers · shows the latest audit

ModelsAtlas: SAFE BMODELSATLASSAFE · B
[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403/verify-bug/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403/verify-bug/)

The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.

Similar skills

Android Agp Upgrade✓SAFE

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Upgrade an Android project to Android Gradle Plugin (AGP) 9. Use when migrating to AGP 9, updating Gradle build files, migrating to built-in Kotlin, or adopting the new AGP DSL.

★ 575Grade B
Android Architecture✓SAFE

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Apply Clean Architecture layering, modularization, and Unidirectional Data Flow in Android projects. Use when setting up project structure, placing code in layers, configuring feature/core modules, or implementing UDF…

★ 575Grade B
Android Background Work✓SAFE

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Implement WorkManager and background processing correctly on Android. Use when creating Worker classes, scheduling tasks, choosing between WorkManager and Foreground Services, or setting up Hilt in workers; defer FCM…

★ 575Grade B
Android Compose✓SAFE

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Build high-performance declarative UI with Jetpack Compose. Use when writing Composable functions, optimizing recomposition, hoisting state, or working with LazyColumn and side effects; defer deep-link and navigation…

★ 575Grade B
Android Compose Migration✓SAFE

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Migrate an Android XML View to Jetpack Compose following a structured 10-step workflow. Use when converting XML layouts to Compose, setting up Compose in an existing View-based project, or incrementally adopting Compose.

★ 575Grade B
Android Concurrency✓SAFE

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Write correct coroutine scopes, lifecycle collection, and dispatcher injection in Android production code. Use for suspend functions, coroutine scopes, and dispatcher mechanics; defer ViewModel StateFlow/LiveData…

★ 575Grade B

Add this badge to your README

[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403/verify-bug/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403/verify-bug/)

Questions about Verify Bug

What does the Verify Bug skill do?
A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages
Is Verify Bug safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Verify Bug access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Verify Bug work with?
Its documentation mentions windsurf. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6f5be687a268), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.