ReportSAFE
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
Overview
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: report
description: "Generate submission-ready reports for all confirmed findings. Runs dedup, PoC builder, quality check, and report writer. Usage: /report bounty or /report pentest"
disable-model-invocation: false
---
Generate reports for confirmed findings. Format: $ARGUMENTS (default: bounty)
This runs the full reporting pipeline. Run this AFTER /pipeline and /validate.
## Step 1: Dedup and Inventory
Run `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/dedup_findings.py --scan-dir scans/ --db findings.json --stats`
Read findings.md and brain effective techniques.
Show the user a numbered list of confirmed findings.
## Step 2: For EACH confirmed finding (one at a time):
### 2a: Check if PoC exists
Look in poc/ directory. If no PoC for this finding, launch `poc-builder` agent:
"Create PoC for: [finding details]. You MUST write files to poc/<finding-slug>/. Create reproduce.sh and poc.html (if client-side). Do NOT just output to terminal — write the actual files."
### 2b: Check if evidence exists
Look in evidence/ directory. If no screenshots/recordings exist:
- Do NOT claim screenshots exist if they haven't been taken
- Do NOT hallucinate file paths — verify files exist with `ls` before referencing them
- Tell the user: "No evidence captured yet. Run /evidence screenshot to capture, or note 'evidence pending' in the report."
### 2c: Determine CVSS version
Read `scope.yaml` to check the `platform:` field.
- If `platform: hackerone` → use **CVSS 3.1** (HackerOne does not support CVSS 4.0)
- All other platforms → use **CVSS 4.0**
### 2d: Draft the report
Launch `report-writer` agent:
"Write a bug bounty report for: [finding details]. Format: $ARGUMENTS.
Platform: [platform from scope.yaml]. CVSS version: [3.1 if hackerone, 4.0 otherwise].
CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS:
1. You MUST write the report to reports/drafts/<finding-slug>.md using the Write tool. Do NOT just output to terminal.
2. Use the CVSS version specified above. HackerOne requires CVSS 3.1. All other platforms use CVSS 4.0.
3. Title formula: [Vuln] in [Component] Enables [Impact].
4. Only reference PoC files and screenshots that ACTUALLY EXIST on disk — verify with ls before citing.
5. Include PoC at [path] and evidence at [path] ONLY if those files exist.
6. NEVER hardcode the researcher username, email, password, or token. If you need to embed the reporter identity (e.g., in a sample signup or PoC), write the env-var symbol like `${HACKERONE_EMAIL_ALIAS}` (HackerOne), `${BUGCROWD_EMAIL_ALIAS}` (Bugcrowd), `${INTIGRITI_EMAIL_ALIAS}` (Intigriti), or `${YESWEHACK_EMAIL}` (YesWeHack). Substitution happens at submit time. See `rules/identities.md` for the full table."
### 2e: Quality check
Launch `quality-check` agent on the draft. If score < 7, show issues and ask user if they want to fix and re-check.
## Step 3: Summary
After all findings are processed, show:
```
Reports generated:
1. [title] — score: X/10 — reports/drafts/finding-1.md
2. [title] — score: X/10 — reports/drafts/finding-2.md
...
Ready for submission:
/dupcheck <finding> — check for duplicates
/submit <finding> — submit to platform
```
## Step 4: Sync
Run `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/global_brain.py sync-from-local`
Run `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/statusline.py`
## Top-Tier Report Standard
A report is ready when a tired triager can reproduce and justify it without guessing.
Hard requirements:
- title states vuln, component, and proven impact
- summary explains the business risk in two sentences
- steps use exact accounts, URLs, headers, payloads, and expected markers
- impact section maps the primitive to customer, tenant, financial, admin, secret, or execution consequence
- evidence paths exist and are referenced accurately
- CVSS version follows platform rules and vector matches final proven impact
- duplicate risk and known prior art are addressed when relevant
- remediation names the broken control, not just "validate input"
If any confirmed finding lacks PoC or evidence, stop report generation for that finding and send it back to `/validate` or `/chain`.Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.
be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__report.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | be1723764604 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Report skill do?
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
Is Report safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Report access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.