Atlas / Skills / h-mmer / Pipeline

PipelineSAFE

skills/h-mmer/pipeline

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
—
Stars
1,004
01

Overview

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Read from source at commit be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: pipeline
description: "Prepare the battlefield — recon, scanning, and surface ranking. Stops before hunting. Run /hunt or /autopilot after. Usage: /pipeline or /pipeline <target>"
disable-model-invocation: false
---
Prepare the battlefield for: $ARGUMENTS

This command runs recon, scanning, and surface ranking — everything needed BEFORE hunting.
It does NOT hunt, validate, or report. Use `/hunt` or `/autopilot` for that.

## Phase 0: SETUP

1. Read `scope.yaml` — resolve and verify targets
   - If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty: `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/scope_check.py --list`
   - If `$ARGUMENTS` is a domain: `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/scope_check.py $ARGUMENTS`
2. Read `policy.md` — extract policy preamble for all agent dispatches
3. Brain init or brief:
   - If no brain exists: `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/brain.py init`
   - If brain exists: `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/brain.py brief <target>`

## Phase 1: RECON

4. Dispatch `recon` agent (model: inherit) with policy preamble and scope
5. After recon: dispatch `config-auditor` agent (model: inherit) for header/TLS/cookie review
6. After config: dispatch `js-analyzer` agent (model: inherit) for JavaScript analysis
7. Brain update: `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/brain.py record <target> recon "<results summary>"`

## Phase 2: SCANNING (parallel, max 3)

8. Dispatch in parallel (all model: inherit, all with policy preamble):
   - `vuln-scanner` agent with nuclei on discovered hosts
   - `waf-profiler` agent on primary targets
9. Brain update with scan results

## Phase 3: RANK

10. Dispatch `recon-ranker` agent (model: inherit) with recon data + brain knowledge
11. Output P1/P2/Kill list

## Complete

```
Battlefield ready.

P1 targets: [list]
P2 targets: [list]
Kill list:  [list]

Next steps:
  /hunt <target>     — manual hunting on a specific target
  /autopilot         — autonomous hunting across all P1 targets
  /surface           — re-rank surface with current brain knowledge
```

Sync brain: `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/global_brain.py sync-from-local`

## Top-Tier Pipeline Standard

The pipeline prepares a battlefield, not a folder of scan files.

1. Scope first: every generated target must be in-scope or tagged `out-of-scope` with reason.
2. Normalize assets into stable inventories: hosts, endpoints, JS files, APIs, auth flows, cloud buckets, repos, mobile packages, and third-party integrations.
3. Rank during collection. Do not wait until the end to identify crown jewels.
4. Preserve raw evidence and parsed summaries. A hunter should be able to replay the exact source of every target.
5. End with `P1`, `P2`, and `Kill` lists plus the best first vuln class for each P1. If no P1 exists, say why and recommend monitoring or a different program.
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (1)

LOWInventory / provenance · inv.no_license · CWE-1104
Why it matters. no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix. add a licence

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.

Audited 2026-10-13 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__pipeline.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-13be1723764604SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Pipeline skill do?

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Is Pipeline safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Pipeline access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement