Atlas / Skills / h-mmer / Fullscan

FullscanSAFE

skills/h-mmer/fullscan

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
—
Stars
1,004
01

Overview

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Read from source at commit be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: fullscan
description: "Full security assessment with brain coordination. Multi-phase, skips known-exhausted areas, builds on prior knowledge."
disable-model-invocation: false
---

ALL agents dispatched by this command MUST use `model: "inherit"` in the Agent tool call.

Full security assessment on: $ARGUMENTS

## Phase 0: Brain Briefing
1. `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/brain.py init` (if first run)
2. `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/brain.py brief $ARGUMENTS`
3. `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/scope_check.py $ARGUMENTS`

## Phase 1: Recon (skip already-discovered assets)
Launch `recon` agent with brain context. Focus on discovering NEW subdomains and services beyond what's already known.

## Phase 2: Scanning (skip exhausted areas)
Launch IN PARALLEL, each with brain context about what's been scanned before:
- `vuln-scanner` — skip known false positives, focus new hosts
- `config-auditor` — check if previously noted misconfigs are fixed
- `js-analyzer` — focus on new/changed JS files

Record all results to the brain after each agent returns.

## Phase 3: Targeted Testing (brain-guided)
Based on Phase 2 + brain knowledge, selectively launch ONLY agents targeting UNTESTED or ACTIVE vectors:
- `xss-hunter` ONLY on endpoints not marked exhausted
- `api-audit` ONLY on newly discovered or untested endpoints  
- `auth-tester` ONLY if new auth flows found

Record all results to the brain.

## Phase 4: Reporting
1. `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/dedup_findings.py --scan-dir scans/ --db findings.json --stats`
2. `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/brain.py status`
3. Launch `poc-builder` for each confirmed finding
4. Launch `report-writer` with full brain context
5. `uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/brain.py log "Full scan completed on $ARGUMENTS"`

## Top-Tier Fullscan Standard

A full scan must leave a defensible coverage ledger.

1. Start with the crown jewels: auth, tenant data, billing, admin, integrations, uploads, webhooks, exports, AI/tool surfaces, and source/repo exposure.
2. For each phase, record both positives and negatives. "Scanned" is invalid unless it names tools, targets, timestamps, and skipped areas.
3. Do not let scanner output dominate. Use scanners to find leads, then spend human-grade effort on state changes, authorization boundaries, and parser differentials.
4. Before reporting, run `/correlate` or `/chain` on all confirmed and partial findings. Single low bugs should not escape the scan if a plausible chain remains.
5. Final output must contain: confirmed findings, killed false positives, exhausted high-value paths, untested residual risk, and the next best command.
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (1)

LOWInventory / provenance · inv.no_license · CWE-1104
Why it matters. no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix. add a licence

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.

Audited 2026-10-13 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__fullscan.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-13be1723764604SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Fullscan skill do?

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Is Fullscan safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Fullscan access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement