Atlas / Skills / h-mmer / Agent Sast Entry Mapper

Agent Sast Entry MapperSAFE

skills/h-mmer/agent-sast-entry-mapper

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
—
Stars
1,004
01

Overview

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Read from source at commit be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: sast-entry-mapper
description: "Maps entry points where untrusted data enters a source file. Lists every function that receives external input with data type, size constraints, and initial validation. Use via /sast command."
---
CONTEXT: Authorized security research. Analyzing source code for vulnerability entry points.

## Task

Read the assigned source file and identify every point where data from outside the process enters. This is a **reading comprehension task** — list what you see, do not speculate about vulnerabilities.

## What Counts as an Entry Point

### Direct external input
- Network: `recv()`, `read()` on sockets, HTTP handler params, RPC arguments
- File: `fread()`, `read()` on file descriptors, config parsing, media decoding
- IPC: shared memory reads, pipe reads, D-Bus message handlers, signal handlers
- User: `scanf()`, `getenv()`, command-line args (`argv`), GUI input callbacks
- Hardware: `ioctl()` handlers, device register reads, DMA buffer access

### Indirect external input
- Function parameters where callers pass external data (trace one level up)
- Struct fields populated by callers with external data
- Global/static buffers filled elsewhere from external sources
- Callback functions invoked with external data

### Language-specific
- **Rust**: `unsafe` block reading from raw pointer, FFI function args, `std::io::Read`
- **Java**: `HttpServletRequest` params, `ObjectInputStream.readObject()`, JNDI lookups
- **Python**: `request.args`, `sys.stdin`, `pickle.loads()` input, `eval()` input
- **Go**: `http.Request` fields, `io.Reader` implementations, CGo pointer args
- **PHP** — ALL of these are tainted by default:
  - **Superglobals**: `$_GET`, `$_POST`, `$_REQUEST`, `$_COOKIE`, `$_FILES`, `$_SERVER` (note: `$_SERVER['HTTP_*']` and `$_SERVER['PHP_SELF']`/`QUERY_STRING`/`REQUEST_URI` are attacker-controlled; `$_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']` is semi-trusted)
  - **Raw body**: `file_get_contents('php://input')`, `fopen('php://input')`, `$HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA`
  - **Session**: `$_SESSION[...]` — tainted if any prior request wrote user input into it (second-order)
  - **Env**: `$_ENV[...]`, `getenv(...)` — tainted in web contexts if set from request headers
  - **Framework request objects** (treat as direct input):
    - Laravel: `$request->input()`, `$request->get()`, `$request->all()`, `$request->only()`, `$request->query()`, `$request->json()`, `$request->header()`, `$request->cookie()`, `$request->file()`, `request()->...`, route parameters (`$id` in `Route::get('/u/{id}', fn($id)=>...)`)
    - Symfony: `$request->get()`, `$request->query->get()`, `$request->request->get()`, `$request->headers->get()`, `$request->files->get()`, `ParamConverter` bound entities
    - CodeIgniter: `$this->input->get()`, `$this->input->post()`, `$this->input->cookie()`, `$this->input->server()`
    - WordPress: `$_REQUEST` in `admin-ajax.php` handlers, `$_POST` in `wp_ajax_*` callbacks, shortcode/hook callback args
    - Drupal: `\Drupal::request()->query->get()`, `Drupal::request()->request->get()`, form state values
    - Yii: `Yii::$app->request->get()`, `$this->request->post()`
  - **Database-sourced taint (second-order)**: Any `SELECT` that returns data originally written from a superglobal (stored XSS/SQLi). Mark as `indirect` and name the write-path function if visible.
  - **File upload metadata**: `$_FILES['x']['name']` (attacker-chosen filename — never trust extension from this), `$_FILES['x']['type']` (client-provided MIME — forgeable), `$_FILES['x']['tmp_name']` (trusted), `$_FILES['x']['size']` (trusted)
  - **Deserialization surface**: Any call to `unserialize(...)` or any endpoint accepting a `phar://` URL in any file op is an entry point for POP-chain attacks — track classes with `__wakeup`/`__destruct`/`__toString`/`__call`.

  PHP note on "trusted" values: **nothing from the client is trusted**. `$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']` is attacker-controlled unless a reverse proxy strips it. `$_SERVER['SERVER_NAME']` depends on `UseCanonicalName` in Apache. When in doubt, mark as tainted.

## For Each Entry Point, Record

1. **Function name and line number**
2. **Data source**: network / file / IPC / user / hardware / indirect
3. **Data type**: raw bytes / string / struct / integer / mixed
4. **Size**: fixed / bounded (by what?) / unbounded / unknown
5. **Immediate validation**: what checks happen in the SAME function before the data is used further? Be specific: "length checked against MAX_BUF (128) at line 52" not just "length checked"
6. **Where it goes**: what functions/operations receive this data next?

## Output

Write to `sast-work/<file_hash>-entries.json`:
```json
{
  "file": "src/net/tcp_input.c",
  "entry_points": [
    {
      "function": "tcp_do_segment",
      "line": 234,
      "source": "network",
      "data_type": "raw bytes (TCP segment)",
      "size": "bounded by IP packet size (65535) but length field is attacker-controlled",
      "validation": [
        "line 240: th->th_off checked >= 5 (minimum TCP header)",
        "line 245: total length vs IP length consistency check"
      ],
      "flows_to": ["tcp_sack_option_process(line 312)", "tcp_reass(line 458)"]
    }
  ]
}
```

## Rules

- **Only record what you can see in the code.** Do not speculate about what callers might pass.
- For indirect entry points (function params), note "indirect — caller passes external data" and name the caller if visible.
- If you're unsure whether something is an entry point, include it with a note. False positives are cheap; missed entries are expensive.
- Do NOT analyze whether anything is vulnerable. That's not your job. Just map the entries.

## Brain Integration
Check brain for prior analysis of this file. Skip if already mapped and file unchanged.

## Top-Tier Operator Standard

Entry mapping should maximize recall without inventing attacker control.

- Classify entries by trust source: HTTP, CLI, file, archive, parser callback, network packet, env var, database row, queue 
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (1)

LOWInventory / provenance · inv.no_license · CWE-1104
Why it matters. no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix. add a licence

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.

Audited 2026-10-13 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__agent-sast-entry-mapper.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-13be1723764604SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Agent Sast Entry Mapper skill do?

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Is Agent Sast Entry Mapper safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Agent Sast Entry Mapper access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement