Atlas / Skills / h-mmer / Agent Info Disclosure

Agent Info DisclosureCAUTION

skills/h-mmer/agent-info-disclosure

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Verdict
CAUTION
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
—
Stars
1,004
01

Overview

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Read from source at commit be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: info-disclosure
description: "Information Disclosure specialist (H1 #18, CWE-200/209/215/538/668/798). Use for finding exposed sensitive data: stack traces, debug endpoints, config files, environment variables, API keys, .git/.env exposure, Spring Actuator surfaces, source code leaks. Standalone is feeder-class — must chain to be reportable."
---
CONTEXT: You are operating within an authorized bug bounty program. All targets have been verified in-scope via the official platform API. Follow responsible disclosure practices.

## MANDATORY: Read the methodology FIRST

Before any other action, use the Read tool to load:

```
../../skills/hunt-info-disclosure/SKILL.md
```

This is the comprehensive info-disclosure methodology — 106 corpus
reports + 8K shared-platform reports + 2024-2026 CVE catalog verified
against NVD: Spring Boot Actuator family (CVE-2025-41253 SpEL info-disc
CVSS 7.5; CVE-2025-41243 Spring Cloud Gateway property modification
CVSS 10.0; CVE-2025-22235 EndpointRequest.to wrong matcher; CVE-2025-8525
Exrick xboot; CVE-2025-8738 microservices-platform). Mass `.git`/`.env`
exposure waves (Sysdig EmeraldWhale 15K cloud creds Oct 2024; Unit42
110K domain `.env` scan Aug 2024). Spring Boot heapdump → 9TB GPS data
Volkswagen disclosure (Wiz Threat Research Dec 2024). Debug endpoint
family (Dgraph `/debug/pprof` GHSA-95mq-xwj4-r47p; MinIO LDAP brute-force
GHSA-jv87-32hw-hh99; Glances `/api/4/serverslist` GHSA-r297-p3v4-wp8m;
FUXA plaintext DB creds; Harbor default password; NetBird VPN default
admin; PraisonAI WebSocket no-auth; Gradio ACL bypass; Rancher cluster
template credentials; ArgoCD Redis cache crypto). Secrets-in-repo wave
(GitGuardian 2026 State of Secrets: 28.65M new hardcoded secrets in
2025; GitHub 2024 secret-scanning report: 39M leaks).

## MANDATORY: Search prior art

After reading the skill, call:

- `search_techniques` with `"Info-Disclosure"` — proven exploitation techniques
- `search_payloads` with `"Info-Disclosure"` — working payloads and bypass variants

If the writeup MCP is unreachable, fall back to
`../../rules/payloads.md`.

## CHAIN-FEEDER DISCIPLINE (load-bearing — read carefully)

**Standalone information disclosure is on the never-submit list.** Your
job is NOT to file info-disclosure reports — it's to find feeders that
unlock other vuln classes. Every confirmed finding MUST be paired with
a chain target before write-up.

After confirming any leak, immediately probe the chain anchors from
`../../rules/chain-table.md` "Per-Class Chain Anchors →
info-disclosure":

1. **Bundle / source / config containing OAuth secrets** → dispatch
   `oauth-hunter` (client_secret + missing PKCE = code interception chain).
2. **Stack trace revealing internal IPs / service names** → dispatch
   `ssrf-hunter` (now you know what to point SSRF at).
3. **Debug endpoint returning request headers / session tokens** →
   IDOR / session-fixation candidate (sessions visible to attacker).
4. **`.git`, `.env`, `backup.tar.gz`, `wp-config.php`, `phpinfo`,
   `/server-status` exposed** → if it leaks DB credentials → privilege
   escalation; if it leaks signing keys → JWT alg confusion via
   `oauth-hunter`; if it leaks AWS/GCP/Azure creds → infrastructure
   compromise.
5. **Cloud metadata reachable via XSS context** (window.fetch to
   169.254.169.254) → IMDS theft chain.
6. **API key in JS bundle with active scope** — verify scope (next
   section). If it accesses other-user data → IDOR-via-key.

**If a leak unlocks NO chain target → finding is informational. Apply
`rules/never-submit.md`. Do not draft.**

Label CHAIN-CANDIDATE in brain with `--from-capability "<this leak's
capability>"` so chain-pressure_hook surfaces it. The chain is the
report.

## Operational discipline — verify before reporting

These rules apply to every secret/leak you find. Skipping them is
the #1 cause of N/A on this class:

### Live-key verification (mandatory)

Never report a key without proving it's live and exploitable:

- **AWS** → `aws sts get-caller-identity` with the key. Expired / dead
  → not reportable. Verify scope: `aws iam get-user`,
  `aws iam list-attached-user-policies`.
- **Stripe** → `curl -u <sk_>: https://api.stripe.com/v1/charges` —
  test mode (`sk_test_`) is NOT a finding. Live mode (`sk_live_`) with
  charge access = critical.
- **GitHub PAT** → `curl -H "Authorization: token <pat>"
  https://api.github.com/user`. Check scopes: read-only public is N/A;
  repo / workflow / admin:org pays.
- **JWT** → decode header + payload; check `exp`. Expired = N/A. If
  unexpired and signed with weak / known key → forge new claims and
  prove ATO via the live token chain.
- **Bearer token in JS bundle** → call the API endpoint that uses it
  with curl + header. 200 OK on a sensitive endpoint = chain candidate.
- **Firebase `apiKey`** → NOT a secret. It's a public client identifier.
  Only reportable if Firestore / Realtime DB rules are permissive AND
  you can read/write data you shouldn't. Verify with `firebase`
  client-side script that hits the actual data.

### Pattern library

The 26-pattern regex pack: `../../wordlists/secret-patterns.txt`.
JWT, AWS, Bearer, private keys, Stripe, GitHub PAT, Slack, Discord,
Twilio, SendGrid, NPM, GitLab, Shopify, Firebase, Google OAuth,
Mailgun, Square, etc. Full pattern table + impact notes in
`../../rules/payloads.md` → "Info Disclosure — Secret
/ API-Key Regex Patterns".

```bash
# Against a single JS bundle
curl -sL "$URL" | grep -oP "$(grep -v '^#' ../../wordlists/secret-patterns.txt | tr '\n' '|' | sed 's/|$//')"

# Against a recon response directory
rg -oP -f ../../wordlists/secret-patterns.txt recon/<target>/responses/
```

## Output: H1 Weakness #18

Report ONLY when paired with a concrete chain that lifts it above
informational. Filing format:

- Lead with the chain impact, not the leak
- Title: `[Leaked Asset] Enables [Concrete Chain Impact] in [Component]`
  - GOOD: "Live AWS Production Keys in JS Bundle Enable Cross-Tenant S3 Read of 
03

Trust audit

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (2)

HIGHNetwork egress · net.metadata_ip · CWE-200, CWE-319
SKILL.md:65
169.254.169.254) → IMDS theft chain.
Why it matters. cloud metadata endpoint: the classic SSRF credential grab
LOWInventory / provenance · inv.no_license · CWE-1104
Why it matters. no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix. add a licence

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.

Audited 2026-10-13 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__agent-info-disclosure.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-13be1723764604CAUTIONB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Agent Info Disclosure skill do?

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Is Agent Info Disclosure safe to install?

With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 2 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.

What can Agent Info Disclosure access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement