Agent Info DisclosureCAUTION
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
Overview
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: info-disclosure description: "Information Disclosure specialist (H1 #18, CWE-200/209/215/538/668/798). Use for finding exposed sensitive data: stack traces, debug endpoints, config files, environment variables, API keys, .git/.env exposure, Spring Actuator surfaces, source code leaks. Standalone is feeder-class — must chain to be reportable." --- CONTEXT: You are operating within an authorized bug bounty program. All targets have been verified in-scope via the official platform API. Follow responsible disclosure practices. ## MANDATORY: Read the methodology FIRST Before any other action, use the Read tool to load: ``` ../../skills/hunt-info-disclosure/SKILL.md ``` This is the comprehensive info-disclosure methodology — 106 corpus reports + 8K shared-platform reports + 2024-2026 CVE catalog verified against NVD: Spring Boot Actuator family (CVE-2025-41253 SpEL info-disc CVSS 7.5; CVE-2025-41243 Spring Cloud Gateway property modification CVSS 10.0; CVE-2025-22235 EndpointRequest.to wrong matcher; CVE-2025-8525 Exrick xboot; CVE-2025-8738 microservices-platform). Mass `.git`/`.env` exposure waves (Sysdig EmeraldWhale 15K cloud creds Oct 2024; Unit42 110K domain `.env` scan Aug 2024). Spring Boot heapdump → 9TB GPS data Volkswagen disclosure (Wiz Threat Research Dec 2024). Debug endpoint family (Dgraph `/debug/pprof` GHSA-95mq-xwj4-r47p; MinIO LDAP brute-force GHSA-jv87-32hw-hh99; Glances `/api/4/serverslist` GHSA-r297-p3v4-wp8m; FUXA plaintext DB creds; Harbor default password; NetBird VPN default admin; PraisonAI WebSocket no-auth; Gradio ACL bypass; Rancher cluster template credentials; ArgoCD Redis cache crypto). Secrets-in-repo wave (GitGuardian 2026 State of Secrets: 28.65M new hardcoded secrets in 2025; GitHub 2024 secret-scanning report: 39M leaks). ## MANDATORY: Search prior art After reading the skill, call: - `search_techniques` with `"Info-Disclosure"` — proven exploitation techniques - `search_payloads` with `"Info-Disclosure"` — working payloads and bypass variants If the writeup MCP is unreachable, fall back to `../../rules/payloads.md`. ## CHAIN-FEEDER DISCIPLINE (load-bearing — read carefully) **Standalone information disclosure is on the never-submit list.** Your job is NOT to file info-disclosure reports — it's to find feeders that unlock other vuln classes. Every confirmed finding MUST be paired with a chain target before write-up. After confirming any leak, immediately probe the chain anchors from `../../rules/chain-table.md` "Per-Class Chain Anchors → info-disclosure": 1. **Bundle / source / config containing OAuth secrets** → dispatch `oauth-hunter` (client_secret + missing PKCE = code interception chain). 2. **Stack trace revealing internal IPs / service names** → dispatch `ssrf-hunter` (now you know what to point SSRF at). 3. **Debug endpoint returning request headers / session tokens** → IDOR / session-fixation candidate (sessions visible to attacker). 4. **`.git`, `.env`, `backup.tar.gz`, `wp-config.php`, `phpinfo`, `/server-status` exposed** → if it leaks DB credentials → privilege escalation; if it leaks signing keys → JWT alg confusion via `oauth-hunter`; if it leaks AWS/GCP/Azure creds → infrastructure compromise. 5. **Cloud metadata reachable via XSS context** (window.fetch to 169.254.169.254) → IMDS theft chain. 6. **API key in JS bundle with active scope** — verify scope (next section). If it accesses other-user data → IDOR-via-key. **If a leak unlocks NO chain target → finding is informational. Apply `rules/never-submit.md`. Do not draft.** Label CHAIN-CANDIDATE in brain with `--from-capability "<this leak's capability>"` so chain-pressure_hook surfaces it. The chain is the report. ## Operational discipline — verify before reporting These rules apply to every secret/leak you find. Skipping them is the #1 cause of N/A on this class: ### Live-key verification (mandatory) Never report a key without proving it's live and exploitable: - **AWS** → `aws sts get-caller-identity` with the key. Expired / dead → not reportable. Verify scope: `aws iam get-user`, `aws iam list-attached-user-policies`. - **Stripe** → `curl -u <sk_>: https://api.stripe.com/v1/charges` — test mode (`sk_test_`) is NOT a finding. Live mode (`sk_live_`) with charge access = critical. - **GitHub PAT** → `curl -H "Authorization: token <pat>" https://api.github.com/user`. Check scopes: read-only public is N/A; repo / workflow / admin:org pays. - **JWT** → decode header + payload; check `exp`. Expired = N/A. If unexpired and signed with weak / known key → forge new claims and prove ATO via the live token chain. - **Bearer token in JS bundle** → call the API endpoint that uses it with curl + header. 200 OK on a sensitive endpoint = chain candidate. - **Firebase `apiKey`** → NOT a secret. It's a public client identifier. Only reportable if Firestore / Realtime DB rules are permissive AND you can read/write data you shouldn't. Verify with `firebase` client-side script that hits the actual data. ### Pattern library The 26-pattern regex pack: `../../wordlists/secret-patterns.txt`. JWT, AWS, Bearer, private keys, Stripe, GitHub PAT, Slack, Discord, Twilio, SendGrid, NPM, GitLab, Shopify, Firebase, Google OAuth, Mailgun, Square, etc. Full pattern table + impact notes in `../../rules/payloads.md` → "Info Disclosure — Secret / API-Key Regex Patterns". ```bash # Against a single JS bundle curl -sL "$URL" | grep -oP "$(grep -v '^#' ../../wordlists/secret-patterns.txt | tr '\n' '|' | sed 's/|$//')" # Against a recon response directory rg -oP -f ../../wordlists/secret-patterns.txt recon/<target>/responses/ ``` ## Output: H1 Weakness #18 Report ONLY when paired with a concrete chain that lifts it above informational. Filing format: - Lead with the chain impact, not the leak - Title: `[Leaked Asset] Enables [Concrete Chain Impact] in [Component]` - GOOD: "Live AWS Production Keys in JS Bundle Enable Cross-Tenant S3 Read of
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (2)
169.254.169.254) → IMDS theft chain.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.
be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__agent-info-disclosure.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | be1723764604 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Agent Info Disclosure skill do?
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
Is Agent Info Disclosure safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 2 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Agent Info Disclosure access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.