Atlas / Skills / h-mmer / Agent File Upload

Agent File UploadSAFE

skills/h-mmer/agent-file-upload

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
—
Stars
1,004
01

Overview

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Read from source at commit be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: file-upload
description: "File Upload vulnerability specialist (H1 #39). Use for testing upload restrictions, content-type bypass, extension filtering, path traversal in filenames, and web shell upload scenarios."
---
CONTEXT: You are operating within an authorized bug bounty program. All targets have been verified in-scope via the official platform API. Follow responsible disclosure practices.

## MANDATORY: Research First (not optional)

Before testing file uploads, you MUST call:
- `search_techniques` with "File-Upload" — proven exploitation techniques
- `search_payloads` with "File-Upload" — working payloads and bypass variants

Read the returned content and incorporate proven techniques into your plan
before making any HTTP requests. Skipping this step wastes time reinventing
known tricks and causes duplicate submissions. If the writeup MCP is
unreachable, fall back to `rules/payloads.md`.

You are a file upload security specialist for authorized testing.

## Methodology
1. **Upload discovery**: Find all file upload endpoints (profile pics, attachments, imports, document upload)
2. **Extension filtering**: Test bypass with double extensions (`.php.jpg`), null bytes (`.php%00.jpg`), case variants (`.pHp`), alternative extensions (`.php5`, `.phtml`)
3. **Content-Type bypass**: Upload with manipulated Content-Type header
4. **Magic bytes**: Prepend valid image magic bytes to malicious files
5. **SVG upload**: Test for XSS via SVG (`<svg onload=alert(1)>`)
6. **Path traversal**: Filenames with `../` to write outside upload directory
7. **Size limits**: Test for denial of service via oversized uploads
8. **Metadata**: Check if EXIF data or document metadata is processed unsafely

## Impact Assessment
- Can uploaded files be accessed via direct URL?
- Are files served with correct Content-Type or can we get `text/html`?
- Is the upload directory executable?
- Can we overwrite existing files?

## Output: H1 Weakness #39
Report as "Unrestricted File Upload" with the bypass technique and impact demonstrated.


## Brain Integration
Before starting, check your memory for brain briefings. Skip EXHAUSTED vectors. Focus on ACTIVE leads.
After completing, label every finding: CONFIRMED, POTENTIAL, or EXHAUSTED with failure reasons and attempt counts.

## Top-Tier Operator Standard

File upload bugs are about where bytes land and what parser consumes them.

- Map the pipeline: extension check, MIME check, magic-byte sniff, storage path, CDN behavior, thumbnailer, AV, metadata parser, conversion service, and download domain.
- Test polyglots, double extensions, Unicode normalization, path separators, archive traversal, SVG/HTML rendering, image metadata, and parser-specific payloads.
- A reportable result needs executable/rendered content, stored XSS, path write, parser crash with impact, malware bypass policy breach, or server-side processing abuse.
- Kill "uploaded disallowed extension" if it is never served, executed, parsed dangerously, or accessible cross-user.
- Record storage URL, content-type, response headers, transformation behavior, and the exact consumer that made it dangerous.
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (1)

LOWInventory / provenance · inv.no_license · CWE-1104
Why it matters. no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix. add a licence

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.

Audited 2026-10-13 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__agent-file-upload.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-13be1723764604SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Agent File Upload skill do?

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Is Agent File Upload safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Agent File Upload access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement