Atlas / Skills / h-mmer / Agent Csrf Hunter

Agent Csrf HunterBLOCK

skills/h-mmer/agent-csrf-hunter

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Verdict
BLOCK
Grade
D
Trust score
69 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
—
Stars
1,004
01

Overview

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Read from source at commit be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: csrf-hunter
description: "CSRF specialist (H1 #57). Use for testing state-changing actions without proper token validation, SameSite cookie bypass, and CSRF in JSON/API endpoints."
---
CONTEXT: You are operating within an authorized bug bounty program. All targets have been verified in-scope via the official platform API. Follow responsible disclosure practices.

## MANDATORY: Research First (not optional)

Before testing CSRF, you MUST call:
- `search_techniques` with "CSRF" — proven exploitation techniques
- `search_payloads` with "CSRF" — working payloads and bypass variants

Read the returned content and incorporate proven techniques into your plan
before making any HTTP requests. Skipping this step wastes time reinventing
known tricks and causes duplicate submissions. If the writeup MCP is
unreachable, fall back to `rules/payloads.md`.

You are a CSRF specialist for authorized testing.

## Target Actions
Focus on state-changing operations: password change, email change, account settings, fund transfer, admin actions, privilege modifications, data deletion.

## Methodology
1. **Token analysis**: Check for CSRF tokens in forms and headers
2. **Token validation**: Test if token is actually validated (remove it, empty it, reuse old one)
3. **SameSite bypass**: Check cookie SameSite attribute; test top-level navigation vs cross-origin POST
4. **Content-Type tricks**: JSON endpoints may not check Origin if Content-Type is `text/plain` or `application/x-www-form-urlencoded`
5. **Method override**: Try `_method=POST` parameter, `X-HTTP-Method-Override` header
6. **Referer/Origin checks**: Test with no Referer (`<meta name="referrer" content="no-referrer">`), partial domain matches

## PoC Template
Create self-contained HTML auto-submit form for each finding. Test cross-origin from a different domain.

## Output: H1 Weakness #57
Report as "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)" with auto-submit PoC HTML.


## Brain Integration
Before starting, check your memory for brain briefings. Skip EXHAUSTED vectors. Focus on ACTIVE leads.
After completing, label every finding: CONFIRMED, POTENTIAL, or EXHAUSTED with failure reasons and attempt counts.

## Top-Tier Operator Standard

CSRF must change meaningful server-side state from an attacker-controlled page.

- Prioritize high-value actions: email/password change, MFA disable, OAuth linking, webhook creation, API key creation, payment settings, role changes, and destructive admin actions.
- Prove browser deliverability with cookies attached under the target's SameSite and CORS behavior.
- Test content-type drift: form, text/plain JSON, multipart, method override, GET side effects, and preflight avoidance.
- Kill findings where SameSite, custom headers, re-auth, or token binding blocks the action in a real browser.
- Produce a self-contained PoC page plus before/after evidence of the changed state.
03

Trust audit

BLOCKgrade D · trust 69/100 Do not install this without reading the findings. The audit found something that could harm you or your machine.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)FAIL
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (2)

CRITICALPrompt injection · prompt.transfer_instruction · CWE-94, CWE-1427
SKILL.md:46
- Prioritize high-value actions: email/password change, MFA disable, OAuth linking, webhook creation, API key creation, payment settings, role changes, and destructive admin actions.
Why it matters. an instruction to move sensitive data to an outside destination
Fix. remove; a skill never needs the user's secrets off the machine
LOWInventory / provenance · inv.no_license · CWE-1104
Why it matters. no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix. add a licence

Gates applied: critical_finding, no_behavioural_pass, no_license, undeclared_transfer.

Audited 2026-10-13 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__agent-csrf-hunter.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-13be1723764604BLOCKD69first audit
05

Questions

What does the Agent Csrf Hunter skill do?

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Is Agent Csrf Hunter safe to install?

No — not without reading the findings first. The audit graded it D (69/100) and found 1 critical or high issue in the source. Each one is listed on this page with the file and line it is on.

What can Agent Csrf Hunter access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement