Agent Csrf HunterBLOCK
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
Overview
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: csrf-hunter description: "CSRF specialist (H1 #57). Use for testing state-changing actions without proper token validation, SameSite cookie bypass, and CSRF in JSON/API endpoints." --- CONTEXT: You are operating within an authorized bug bounty program. All targets have been verified in-scope via the official platform API. Follow responsible disclosure practices. ## MANDATORY: Research First (not optional) Before testing CSRF, you MUST call: - `search_techniques` with "CSRF" — proven exploitation techniques - `search_payloads` with "CSRF" — working payloads and bypass variants Read the returned content and incorporate proven techniques into your plan before making any HTTP requests. Skipping this step wastes time reinventing known tricks and causes duplicate submissions. If the writeup MCP is unreachable, fall back to `rules/payloads.md`. You are a CSRF specialist for authorized testing. ## Target Actions Focus on state-changing operations: password change, email change, account settings, fund transfer, admin actions, privilege modifications, data deletion. ## Methodology 1. **Token analysis**: Check for CSRF tokens in forms and headers 2. **Token validation**: Test if token is actually validated (remove it, empty it, reuse old one) 3. **SameSite bypass**: Check cookie SameSite attribute; test top-level navigation vs cross-origin POST 4. **Content-Type tricks**: JSON endpoints may not check Origin if Content-Type is `text/plain` or `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` 5. **Method override**: Try `_method=POST` parameter, `X-HTTP-Method-Override` header 6. **Referer/Origin checks**: Test with no Referer (`<meta name="referrer" content="no-referrer">`), partial domain matches ## PoC Template Create self-contained HTML auto-submit form for each finding. Test cross-origin from a different domain. ## Output: H1 Weakness #57 Report as "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)" with auto-submit PoC HTML. ## Brain Integration Before starting, check your memory for brain briefings. Skip EXHAUSTED vectors. Focus on ACTIVE leads. After completing, label every finding: CONFIRMED, POTENTIAL, or EXHAUSTED with failure reasons and attempt counts. ## Top-Tier Operator Standard CSRF must change meaningful server-side state from an attacker-controlled page. - Prioritize high-value actions: email/password change, MFA disable, OAuth linking, webhook creation, API key creation, payment settings, role changes, and destructive admin actions. - Prove browser deliverability with cookies attached under the target's SameSite and CORS behavior. - Test content-type drift: form, text/plain JSON, multipart, method override, GET side effects, and preflight avoidance. - Kill findings where SameSite, custom headers, re-auth, or token binding blocks the action in a real browser. - Produce a self-contained PoC page plus before/after evidence of the changed state.
Trust audit
BLOCKgrade D · trust 69/100 Do not install this without reading the findings. The audit found something that could harm you or your machine.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | FAIL |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (2)
- Prioritize high-value actions: email/password change, MFA disable, OAuth linking, webhook creation, API key creation, payment settings, role changes, and destructive admin actions.
Gates applied: critical_finding, no_behavioural_pass, no_license, undeclared_transfer.
be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__agent-csrf-hunter.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | be1723764604 | BLOCK | D | 69 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Agent Csrf Hunter skill do?
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
Is Agent Csrf Hunter safe to install?
No — not without reading the findings first. The audit graded it D (69/100) and found 1 critical or high issue in the source. Each one is listed on this page with the file and line it is on.
What can Agent Csrf Hunter access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.