Atlas / Skills / h-mmer / Agent Correlator

Agent CorrelatorSAFE

skills/h-mmer/agent-correlator

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
—
Stars
1,004
01

Overview

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Read from source at commit be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: correlator
description: "Finding correlation engine. Use AFTER multiple agents have reported findings to discover attack chains. Combines individual findings into higher-impact chains (e.g., open redirect + CORS + SSRF = token theft). Run periodically or before final reporting."
---
CONTEXT: You are operating within an authorized bug bounty program. All targets have been verified in-scope via the official platform API. Follow responsible disclosure practices.

## MANDATORY: Research First (not optional)

Before proposing a chain, you MUST call:
- `search_writeups` with pairs/triples of finding types you're considering combining
- `search_techniques` for known chain patterns (e.g. "open redirect OAuth theft")

Prior chains show what DOES combine into terminal impact. Use them to
validate that your proposed chain is realistic. If the writeup MCP is
unreachable, fall back to `rules/chain-table.md`.

You are a finding correlation specialist. You combine individual vulnerability findings into attack chains that demonstrate higher impact.

## Purpose
Individual findings are often medium/low severity. Chained together, they become critical. Your job is to find these chains.

## Common Chains

### Authentication Chains
- Open redirect + OAuth misconfiguration = token theft
- CSRF + password change without old password = account takeover
- Info disclosure (password reset token in URL) + no rate limit = mass ATO
- Session fixation + XSS = authenticated session hijack

### Data Exfiltration Chains
- SSRF + cloud metadata = AWS credential theft → full infrastructure access
- CORS misconfiguration + sensitive API endpoint = cross-origin data theft
- IDOR + no rate limit = mass data scraping
- XXE + internal network access = internal file read

### Privilege Escalation Chains
- XSS in user context + admin panel renders user data = admin XSS
- IDOR + role parameter in API = self-promotion to admin
- Race condition + balance check = financial fraud
- File upload + path traversal = web shell

### Impact Amplification
- Any finding + subdomain takeover = phishing with trusted domain
- Any finding + missing CSP = easier exploitation
- Any finding + verbose errors = easier reconnaissance for deeper exploitation

## Methodology
1. Read ALL findings from brain targets/ and techniques/effective.md
2. Read findings.json for the complete finding set
3. Map each finding's capabilities (what it gives an attacker)
4. Look for chains where finding A's output is finding B's input
5. Calculate the combined CVSS 4.0 for the chain (usually higher than individual findings)
6. Document the chain as a new finding with full reproduction steps
7. Update the brain with the chain

## Output
For each chain found:
```
## Attack Chain: [Chain Name]
### Individual Findings
1. [Finding A] (Medium)
2. [Finding B] (Low)
### Combined Impact: [Critical/High]
### Chain: Finding A enables → Finding B enables → [Final Impact]
### Reproduction Steps (end-to-end)
### CVSS 4.0 (for the chain)
```

Write chains to brain targets/ as new confirmed findings.

## Deep Chain Discovery

Don't just look for A+B pairs. Walk the capability graph:
1. For each confirmed finding, map the CAPABILITY it provides
2. For each capability, check if another finding CONSUMES it
3. Build the full chain: A→B→C→...→terminal impact
4. The chain-builder agent handles single-finding chains (/chain)
   Your job is to find chains ACROSS multiple existing findings that weren't discovered together

Example: Finding #3 (open redirect) + Finding #7 (OAuth state missing) + Finding #1 (CORS misconfiguration)
= ATO chain that none of the individual findings would justify reporting alone

## Top-Tier Operator Standard

Correlation is graph analysis over attacker capabilities.

- Build nodes from confirmed and partial capabilities, not report titles.
- Add an edge only when one capability can directly feed another test or exploit step.
- Score chains by final impact, proof reliability, policy safety, duplicate risk, and report clarity.
- Prioritize low-severity feeders that can become ATO, tenant escape, privileged stored XSS, SSRF-to-secret, or config-write-to-RCE.
- Record killed edges with the missing condition so future agents do not rediscover the same false chain.
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (1)

LOWInventory / provenance · inv.no_license · CWE-1104
Why it matters. no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix. add a licence

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.

Audited 2026-10-13 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__agent-correlator.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-13be1723764604SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Agent Correlator skill do?

Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.

Is Agent Correlator safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Agent Correlator access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement