Agent skill · Audited from source

Mediation Analysis

skill · GPTomics/bioSkillsMIT licenceAudited 19 Oct 2026 · source c8c1fc3a2b13

★ 1,226pushed 65 days agoarchived repository
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 19 Oct 2026 · c8c1fc3
1,226repo stars · whole GPTomics/bioSkills

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit c8c1fc3a2b13 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Decompose total effects into direct and indirect paths through mediators using mediation, CMAverse 4-way, HIMA/HIMA2 high-dimensional, BAMA, two-step / MVMR mediation, or double-ML medDML. Use when testing whether a…

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Mediation Analysis (GPTomics/bioSkills)”. Retrieved 19 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/gptomics/mediation-analysis

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 19 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codePASS0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha c8c1fc3a2b13 · 19 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • PublisherGPTomics GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderGPTomics/bioSkills/causal-genomics/mediation-analysisThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdictc8c1fc3a2b13A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusArchivedLast push 65 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Decompose total effects into direct and indirect paths through mediators using mediation, CMAverse 4-way, HIMA/HIMA2 high-dimensional, BAMA, two-step / MVMR mediation, or double-ML medDML. Use when testing whether a…

---
name: bio-causal-genomics-mediation-analysis
description: Decompose total effects into direct and indirect paths through mediators using mediation, CMAverse 4-way, HIMA/HIMA2 high-dimensional, BAMA, two-step / MVMR mediation, or double-ML medDML. Use when testing whether a molecular phenotype (expression, methylation, protein) mediates a treatment-outcome relationship, decomposing exposure-mediator interaction via VanderWeele 4-way, screening high-dimensional EWAS mediators, or running MR-based mediation when sequential ignorability is implausible.
tool_type: mixed
primary_tool: mediation
---

## Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: R 4.3+, mediation 4.5.0+, CMAverse 0.1.0+ (GitHub `BS1125/CMAverse`), HIMA >= 2.3.0 (GitHub `YinanZheng/HIMA`; archived from CRAN 2026-07), bama 1.3+, causalweight 1.0.5+ (medDML), MVMR 0.4+, TwoSampleMR 0.6+, EValue 4.1+, gesttools 1.3+, ipw 1.0.11+.

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- R: `packageVersion('<pkg>')` then `?function_name` to verify parameters
- HIMA must be pinned at `>= 2.3.0` for the code patterns below; the formula interface `hima(formula, data.pheno, data.M, mediator.type, penalty, ...)` was introduced in 2.3.0. On HIMA 2.2.x the classic engine is the top-level `hima(X, Y, M, COV.XM=, COV.MY=, Y.family=, penalty=)` (positional order X, Y, M) with no formula interface; HIMA 2.2.x is NOT API-compatible with the examples here.
- In 2.3+ the classic engine is `hima_classic(X, M, Y, COV.XM=, COV.MY=, Y.type=)` (positional order X, M, Y; outcome type via `Y.type`, not `Y.family`); use it only to reproduce the original 2016-2021 SIS+penalty pipelines.

If code throws an error, introspect the installed package (`?hima`, `args(cmest)`) and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

# Mediation Analysis

**"Does expression of GENE_X mediate the SNP-to-disease effect?"** -> Decompose the total effect of a treatment (genotype, exposure) on an outcome into direct and indirect paths through one or more mediators, with explicit handling of exposure-mediator interaction, sensitivity to unmeasured confounding, and high-dimensional mediator screening.

- R (single-mediator, observational, sequential-ignorability assumed): `mediation::mediate(med_model, out_model, treat='X', mediator='M', boot=TRUE, sims=5000)`
- R (4-way decomposition with exposure-mediator interaction): `CMAverse::cmest(...EMint=TRUE, estimation='paramfunc', inference='bootstrap', nboot=1000)`
- R (high-dimensional / EWAS mediators): `HIMA::hima(Y ~ X + covariates, data.pheno, data.M, mediator.type='gaussian', penalty='DBlasso')` (modern v2.3+ formula interface)
- R (MR-based mediation): two-step `TwoSampleMR` with independent instruments OR `MVMR::ivw_mvmr` for joint direct effect
- R (doubly-robust double-ML): `causalweight::medDML(y, d, m, x)`

Sequential ignorability (no unmeasured confounder of treatment-mediator, mediator-outcome, treatment-outcome) is the single load-bearing assumption of observational mediation and is fundamentally untestable. Every report should include a sensitivity result (Imai's rho via `medsens()` or a mediational E-value).

## Algorithmic Taxonomy

| Method | Framework | Handles E-M interaction | High-D mediators | Min n | Fails when |
|--------|-----------|--------------------------|------------------|-------|------------|
| Baron-Kenny (1986) | Additive regression-based product/difference | No | No | ~100 | Any non-linearity, interaction, or binary outcome; deprecated for causal inference |
| Imai mediation R (Imai 2010 Psychol Methods) | Counterfactual ACME/ADE with bootstrap | Yes (via interaction term in outcome model) | No | ~200 | Sequential ignorability violated; exposure-induced M-Y confounder; rare binary outcome with logistic outcome model |
| VanderWeele 4-way (VanderWeele 2014 Epidemiology 25:749; 2015 OUP) | CDE + PIE + INTref + INTmed decomposition | Native | No | ~300 | Without interaction term reduces to standard mediation; binary outcome needs rare-disease assumption |
| CMAverse (Shi 2021 Epidemiology 32:e20) | 6 estimators: regression (`rb`), weighting (`wb`), IORW (`iorw`), natural effect models (`ne`), MSM (`msm`), g-formula (`gformula`) | Yes | No (single M, or M-vector) | ~300 | Estimator-specific; `wb` fails with rare exposure; `msm` needs censoring weights for survival |
| HIMA1 / hima_classic (Zhang 2016 Bioinformatics 32:3150) | SIS screen by beta (M->Y) + MCP penalty | No | Yes (up to ~10k) | ~150 + p>>n | Misses mediators with strong alpha and weak beta; screening-step false-negatives |
| HIMA2 / hima (Perera 2022 BMC Bioinformatics 23:296) | SIS screen by alpha*beta (indirect effect) + de-biased Lasso (DBlasso) | No (linear by default) | Yes | ~150 | Outcome family limited (gaussian/binomial); HIMA-Cox for survival; HIMA-Pois for count |
| HILAMA (Wang et al 2025) | High-D mediation with latent confounders | No | Yes (>= 100k) | ~500 | Newer; benchmarks evolving; requires latent-factor specification |
| BAMA (Song 2020 Biometrics) | Bayesian high-D continuous shrinkage | No | Yes (~5k) | ~200 | Slow MCMC; prior sensitivity for very weak mediators |
| Two-step MR / network MR (Burgess 2015 IJE 44:484) | IV-based at each step with INDEPENDENT instruments | Implicit (no interaction modeling) | One mediator at a time | Large summary-stat samples | Same SNP used for E and M (violates exclusion); horizontal pleiotropy; Steiger reversal of M->E direction |
| MVMR-mediation (Carter & Sanderson 2021 Eur J Epidemiol 36:465-478) | Total minus direct via MVMR | Implicit | Single mediator | Large GWAS samples for both E and M | Conditional F < 10 for either exposure; correlated instruments |
| medDML (Farbmacher 2022 Econometrics J 25:277) | Double-debiased ML, doubly-robust | Limited (depends on learner) | Moderate (sparsity-friendly) | ~500 | Severe overlap violations; cross-fitting variance with small n |

Methodology evolves; verify against the cur

Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit c8c1fc3

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills
git -C bioSkills checkout c8c1fc3a2b13

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit c8c1fc3a2b13 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source c8c1fc3a2b13

README badge

For maintainers · shows the latest audit

ModelsAtlas: SAFE BMODELSATLASSAFE · B
[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/gptomics/mediation-analysis/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/gptomics/mediation-analysis/)

The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.

Similar skills

Add this badge to your README

[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/gptomics/mediation-analysis/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/gptomics/mediation-analysis/)

Questions about Mediation Analysis

What does the Mediation Analysis skill do?
a set of SKILLS.md for doing bioinformatics with agents like claude code
Is Mediation Analysis safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Mediation Analysis access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (c8c1fc3a2b13), read on 2026-10-19. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.