Flow Next PrimeSAFE
Faster than your agent alone. And better. A workflow plugin that takes a bug, idea or ticket to a verified pull request: specs, cross-model review by risk, live QA, receipts in your repo. Claude Code · Codex · Cursor · Droid · Grok Build · OpenCode · Muse Code.
Overview
Faster than your agent alone. And better. A workflow plugin that takes a bug, idea or ticket to a verified pull request: specs, cross-model review by risk, live QA, receipts in your repo. Claude Code · Codex · Cursor · Droid · Grok Build · OpenCode · Muse Code.
bd2f79679176OBSERVED · 2026-10-14Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned | |
| codex | mentioned | |
| copilot | mentioned | |
| cursor | mentioned | |
| windsurf | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: flow-next-prime description: Comprehensive codebase assessment for agent and production readiness. Classifies the project (lifecycle, topology, size, stack, shape), scans 8 pillars, verifies commands actually run, checks GitHub settings. Leads with a verdict + ranked next-actions; fixes agent readiness only. Triggers on /flow-next:prime. user-invocable: false --- # Flow Prime Comprehensive codebase assessment inspired by [Factory.ai's Agent Readiness framework](https://factory.ai/news/agent-readiness). **Role**: readiness assessor, improvement proposer **Goal**: full visibility into codebase health, targeted fixes for agent readiness Read [working-rules.md](../../references/working-rules.md) first unless you already have this run; it holds for every step of this skill. ## Two-Tier Assessment | Category | Pillars | What Happens | |----------|---------|--------------| | **Agent Readiness** | 1-5 | Scored, maturity level calculated, fixes offered | | **Production Readiness** | 6-8 | Reported for awareness, no fixes offered | This gives you **full visibility** while keeping remediation focused on what actually helps agents work. **Criteria counts live in [pillars.md](pillars.md), never here.** pillars.md is the single census source (the legacy scored criteria feeding the maturity level, the informational rows, and the new agent-readiness tier groups AO/DR/TO/HP). Do not restate a count in this file - a hardcoded number drifts the moment a criterion is added. The classification, operability ladder, per-shape playbooks, per-stack matrix, and harness check-set live in the four reference files: [classification.md](classification.md), [playbooks.md](playbooks.md), [stacks.md](stacks.md), [harness.md](harness.md). ## Why This Matters Existence checks lie. A repo can carry a CLAUDE.md, a hook file, and a `lint` script yet be un-agentic in practice - the file is an empty template, the build is broken, imports don't resolve, or it is really one of 99 sibling repos. Prime judges **substance**, not existence, and names the single highest-leverage next action. Agents waste cycles when: - **No closed verify loop** → can't confirm a change works without a full CI round-trip; the feedback gate belongs at the RIGHT layer (edit-time/commit format+lint, tests via the verify command + acceptance requirements + CI required check - never a test-running pre-commit hook agents `--no-verify` around or stall on) - **Undocumented env vars** → guesses, fails, guesses again - **No agent instruction file (or a generic/stale one)** → doesn't know project conventions, the operability tier, or which files are off-limits - **The app can't be built or driven** → can't verify changes work; a legacy stack with no headless build has no feedback loop at all These are **environment problems**, not agent problems. Prime grades them as layered gates and helps fix the ones that help agents work. ## Input Full request: $ARGUMENTS Accepts: - No arguments (scans current repo) - `--report-only` or `report only` (skip remediation, just show report) - `--fix-all` or `fix all` (apply all agent readiness fixes without asking) - `--classify-only` or `classify only` (print the Phase 0.5 classification block and EXIT - the cheap portfolio-triage sweep over many repos; see classification.md) - A path to a different repo root (first non-flag argument) Examples: - `/flow-next:prime` - `/flow-next:prime --report-only` - `/flow-next:prime --classify-only ~/other-project` - `/flow-next:prime ~/other-project` **Resolve `ROOT` from `$ARGUMENTS`** (the first non-flag token; default `.`). If `ROOT` is not the cwd, resolve it first (`ROOT=$(cd "$ROOT" && pwd)`), then it MUST thread through everything: `cd "$ROOT"` before the `.flow/meta.json` pre-check, the Phase 0.5 classification probes (the `flowctl prime classify` emitter takes `ROOT` as its positional argument, e.g. `flowctl prime classify --json "$ROOT"`), and the Phase 2 verification commands; and every scout dispatch prompt in Phase 1 starts "Assess the repo at `ROOT`" (scouts scan cwd by default - without this they'd scan the wrong repo and the report would be confidently wrong end-to-end). If threading `ROOT` isn't feasible, error rather than silently scan cwd. ## Route Before Reading References Parse the mode before loading any reference: - **`--classify-only`:** read [classification.md](classification.md) directly, run its emitter + judgment-layer contract, print its fixed classification block, and EXIT. Do **not** read `workflow.md`, `pillars.md`, `playbooks.md`, or `remediation.md`; never ask, dispatch scouts, verify, report, or remediate. - **All other modes:** read [workflow.md](workflow.md) and execute it. The workflow loads classification, pillars, playbooks, stacks, harness, and remediation guidance only at their consuming phases. `--report-only` stops after the report and must never load remediation templates. This dispatch is fail-open for an unknown/malformed mode: use the full workflow, never silently skip assessment or safety instructions. ## Workflow The mode router above selects the entry reference. Do not pre-read references for branches that will not execute. ## Guardrails ### General - Never modify code files (only config, docs, scripts) - Never commit changes (leave for user to review) - Never delete files - Respect .gitignore patterns ### User Consent - **MUST use `AskUserQuestion` tool** for consent (call `ToolSearch` with `select:AskUserQuestion` first if its schema isn't loaded). Never just print questions as text. - Always ask before modifying existing files — **except** under `--fix-all`, which waives the prompt for **append/merge** edits (adding a `.gitignore` line, augmenting an agent file, appending a hook) INCLUDING their required devDependencies for the Critical/High/Medium tiers. `--fix-all` still does NOT: overwrite/replace existing file content unseen, touch the Bonus tier (devcontainer, CI workflow — those stay e
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
bd2f79679176full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/gmickel__flow-next-prime.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | bd2f79679176 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Flow Next Prime skill do?
Faster than your agent alone. And better. A workflow plugin that takes a bug, idea or ticket to a verified pull request: specs, cross-model review by risk, live QA, receipts in your repo. Claude Code · Codex · Cursor · Droid · Grok Build · OpenCode · Muse Code.
Is Flow Next Prime safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Flow Next Prime access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Flow Next Prime work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code, codex, copilot, cursor and windsurf. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (bd2f79679176), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.